Exploring homeplace as a nexus of learning and socially reproductive labour: A feminist perspective on internationalisation at a distance

IF 6.7 1区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
F. Melis Cin, Markus Roos Breines, Parvati Raghuram, Ashley Gunter
{"title":"Exploring homeplace as a nexus of learning and socially reproductive labour: A feminist perspective on internationalisation at a distance","authors":"F. Melis Cin,&nbsp;Markus Roos Breines,&nbsp;Parvati Raghuram,&nbsp;Ashley Gunter","doi":"10.1111/bjet.13553","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <section>\n \n <p>This paper explores the concept of homeplace, examining how it serves as a nexus for learning, reproductive labour, and internationalisation while problematising the gendered and depoliticised nature of international distance education. Drawing on 60 interviews with international distance students at a South African university, the research employs Black and critical feminist perspectives to critique how the blurred boundaries between private and public spheres shape learning experiences. It addresses a gap in the international distance education literature by highlighting the insufficient consideration of the social reproduction responsibilities played out in homeplaces. Our findings reveal that homeplace is neither a gender-neutral nor an idealised study environment. Instead, it leads to unequal participation in learning spaces and internationalisation efforts. Digital platforms, crucial for connectivity and collaboration in international education at a distance, also perpetuate gendered power dynamics that marginalise women's voices and contributions, but women, however, reach out and support each other in these online spaces. The research teases out the tensions between homeplace as a site for learning, living, and social reproduction, emphasising the need for international distance education institutions to address the gendered dynamics in their design and delivery that disproportionately burden those with responsibilities for social reproduction.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <div>\n \n <div>\n \n <h3>Practitioner notes</h3>\n <p>What is already known about this topic\n\n </p><ul>\n \n <li>International distance education focuses on distance education provided internationally.</li>\n \n <li>Internationalisation at a Distance (IaD) activities aim to reach a broader audience beyond local students, leveraging online and blended learning models.</li>\n \n <li>IaD activities depend on the home as one of the main spaces of study while seeing online platforms as the main point of internationalisation.</li>\n \n <li>Thus far, the literature on IaD has not undertaken a critical feminist analysis or deployed Black feminist theories to explore power relations in such spaces.</li>\n </ul>\n <p>What this paper adds\n\n </p><ul>\n \n <li>Examines how the politics of the “homeplace” can be used to understand the educational experiences of international distance education students.</li>\n \n <li>Argues that current debates often overlook how the homeplace as a gendered site influences students' international distance education journeys.</li>\n \n <li>Highlights the gendered nature of the homeplace and complexities of studying from home and online, particularly for women</li>\n \n <li>Provides a critical feminist analysis of IaD, situating and problematising the homeplace as the main site for IaD.</li>\n </ul>\n <p>Implications for practice and/or policy\n\n </p><ul>\n \n <li>Emphasises the need for institutional policies that consider the homeplace as a significant site for internationalisation at a distance.</li>\n \n <li>Recommends the development of support systems and resources to help students manage conflicting demands of home and study.</li>\n \n <li>Advocates for a more nuanced approach to distance education that addresses the diverse needs of students, including those balancing significant responsibilities like employment and family obligations.</li>\n </ul>\n </div>\n </div>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":48315,"journal":{"name":"British Journal of Educational Technology","volume":"56 2","pages":"799-814"},"PeriodicalIF":6.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/bjet.13553","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"British Journal of Educational Technology","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/bjet.13553","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This paper explores the concept of homeplace, examining how it serves as a nexus for learning, reproductive labour, and internationalisation while problematising the gendered and depoliticised nature of international distance education. Drawing on 60 interviews with international distance students at a South African university, the research employs Black and critical feminist perspectives to critique how the blurred boundaries between private and public spheres shape learning experiences. It addresses a gap in the international distance education literature by highlighting the insufficient consideration of the social reproduction responsibilities played out in homeplaces. Our findings reveal that homeplace is neither a gender-neutral nor an idealised study environment. Instead, it leads to unequal participation in learning spaces and internationalisation efforts. Digital platforms, crucial for connectivity and collaboration in international education at a distance, also perpetuate gendered power dynamics that marginalise women's voices and contributions, but women, however, reach out and support each other in these online spaces. The research teases out the tensions between homeplace as a site for learning, living, and social reproduction, emphasising the need for international distance education institutions to address the gendered dynamics in their design and delivery that disproportionately burden those with responsibilities for social reproduction.

Practitioner notes

What is already known about this topic

  • International distance education focuses on distance education provided internationally.
  • Internationalisation at a Distance (IaD) activities aim to reach a broader audience beyond local students, leveraging online and blended learning models.
  • IaD activities depend on the home as one of the main spaces of study while seeing online platforms as the main point of internationalisation.
  • Thus far, the literature on IaD has not undertaken a critical feminist analysis or deployed Black feminist theories to explore power relations in such spaces.

What this paper adds

  • Examines how the politics of the “homeplace” can be used to understand the educational experiences of international distance education students.
  • Argues that current debates often overlook how the homeplace as a gendered site influences students' international distance education journeys.
  • Highlights the gendered nature of the homeplace and complexities of studying from home and online, particularly for women
  • Provides a critical feminist analysis of IaD, situating and problematising the homeplace as the main site for IaD.

Implications for practice and/or policy

  • Emphasises the need for institutional policies that consider the homeplace as a significant site for internationalisation at a distance.
  • Recommends the development of support systems and resources to help students manage conflicting demands of home and study.
  • Advocates for a more nuanced approach to distance education that addresses the diverse needs of students, including those balancing significant responsibilities like employment and family obligations.
探索家乡作为学习和社会再生产劳动的纽带:远距离国际化的女权主义视角
本文探讨了家乡的概念,研究了它如何作为学习、生殖劳动和国际化的纽带,同时对国际远程教育的性别化和非政治化性质提出了问题。通过对南非一所大学的60名留学生的采访,这项研究采用了黑人和批判性女权主义的观点来批评私人领域和公共领域之间模糊的界限是如何影响学习经验的。它通过强调对母国社会再生产责任的充分考虑,解决了国际远程教育文献中的空白。我们的研究结果表明,家既不是中性的,也不是理想的学习环境。相反,它导致了学习空间和国际化努力的不平等参与。数字平台对远程国际教育的联系和合作至关重要,但也使性别权力动态永久化,使女性的声音和贡献被边缘化,但女性在这些在线空间中伸出手来,相互支持。该研究梳理了作为学习、生活和社会再生产场所的家园之间的紧张关系,强调国际远程教育机构需要解决其设计和交付中的性别动态,这种动态给那些承担社会再生产责任的人带来了不成比例的负担。国际远程教育关注的是国际上提供的远程教育。远程国际化(IaD)活动旨在利用在线和混合学习模式,覆盖本地学生以外的更广泛受众。互联网活动依赖于家庭作为主要的学习空间之一,同时将在线平台视为国际化的主要点。到目前为止,关于黑人女性的文献还没有进行批判性的女性主义分析,也没有运用黑人女性主义理论来探索这些空间中的权力关系。本文的补充探讨了如何用“家乡”的政治来理解国际远程教育学生的教育经历。认为当前的争论往往忽视了作为一个性别站点的家乡如何影响学生的国际远程教育之旅。强调了家庭的性别性质和在家和在线学习的复杂性,特别是对女性提供了一个批判性的女权主义分析,将家庭作为家庭学习的主要场所,并提出问题。对实践和/或政策的影响强调需要制定制度政策,将家乡视为远距离国际化的重要场所。建议开发支持系统和资源,以帮助学生处理家庭和学习的冲突需求。提倡采用更细致入微的方式进行远程教育,以满足学生的各种需求,包括平衡就业和家庭义务等重大责任。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
British Journal of Educational Technology
British Journal of Educational Technology EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
15.60
自引率
4.50%
发文量
111
期刊介绍: BJET is a primary source for academics and professionals in the fields of digital educational and training technology throughout the world. The Journal is published by Wiley on behalf of The British Educational Research Association (BERA). It publishes theoretical perspectives, methodological developments and high quality empirical research that demonstrate whether and how applications of instructional/educational technology systems, networks, tools and resources lead to improvements in formal and non-formal education at all levels, from early years through to higher, technical and vocational education, professional development and corporate training.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信