Exploring homeplace as a nexus of learning and socially reproductive labour: A feminist perspective on internationalisation at a distance

IF 6.7 1区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
F. Melis Cin, Markus Roos Breines, Parvati Raghuram, Ashley Gunter
{"title":"Exploring homeplace as a nexus of learning and socially reproductive labour: A feminist perspective on internationalisation at a distance","authors":"F. Melis Cin,&nbsp;Markus Roos Breines,&nbsp;Parvati Raghuram,&nbsp;Ashley Gunter","doi":"10.1111/bjet.13553","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <section>\n \n <p>This paper explores the concept of homeplace, examining how it serves as a nexus for learning, reproductive labour, and internationalisation while problematising the gendered and depoliticised nature of international distance education. Drawing on 60 interviews with international distance students at a South African university, the research employs Black and critical feminist perspectives to critique how the blurred boundaries between private and public spheres shape learning experiences. It addresses a gap in the international distance education literature by highlighting the insufficient consideration of the social reproduction responsibilities played out in homeplaces. Our findings reveal that homeplace is neither a gender-neutral nor an idealised study environment. Instead, it leads to unequal participation in learning spaces and internationalisation efforts. Digital platforms, crucial for connectivity and collaboration in international education at a distance, also perpetuate gendered power dynamics that marginalise women's voices and contributions, but women, however, reach out and support each other in these online spaces. The research teases out the tensions between homeplace as a site for learning, living, and social reproduction, emphasising the need for international distance education institutions to address the gendered dynamics in their design and delivery that disproportionately burden those with responsibilities for social reproduction.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <div>\n \n <div>\n \n <h3>Practitioner notes</h3>\n <p>What is already known about this topic\n\n </p><ul>\n \n <li>International distance education focuses on distance education provided internationally.</li>\n \n <li>Internationalisation at a Distance (IaD) activities aim to reach a broader audience beyond local students, leveraging online and blended learning models.</li>\n \n <li>IaD activities depend on the home as one of the main spaces of study while seeing online platforms as the main point of internationalisation.</li>\n \n <li>Thus far, the literature on IaD has not undertaken a critical feminist analysis or deployed Black feminist theories to explore power relations in such spaces.</li>\n </ul>\n <p>What this paper adds\n\n </p><ul>\n \n <li>Examines how the politics of the “homeplace” can be used to understand the educational experiences of international distance education students.</li>\n \n <li>Argues that current debates often overlook how the homeplace as a gendered site influences students' international distance education journeys.</li>\n \n <li>Highlights the gendered nature of the homeplace and complexities of studying from home and online, particularly for women</li>\n \n <li>Provides a critical feminist analysis of IaD, situating and problematising the homeplace as the main site for IaD.</li>\n </ul>\n <p>Implications for practice and/or policy\n\n </p><ul>\n \n <li>Emphasises the need for institutional policies that consider the homeplace as a significant site for internationalisation at a distance.</li>\n \n <li>Recommends the development of support systems and resources to help students manage conflicting demands of home and study.</li>\n \n <li>Advocates for a more nuanced approach to distance education that addresses the diverse needs of students, including those balancing significant responsibilities like employment and family obligations.</li>\n </ul>\n </div>\n </div>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":48315,"journal":{"name":"British Journal of Educational Technology","volume":"56 2","pages":"799-814"},"PeriodicalIF":6.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/bjet.13553","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"British Journal of Educational Technology","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/bjet.13553","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This paper explores the concept of homeplace, examining how it serves as a nexus for learning, reproductive labour, and internationalisation while problematising the gendered and depoliticised nature of international distance education. Drawing on 60 interviews with international distance students at a South African university, the research employs Black and critical feminist perspectives to critique how the blurred boundaries between private and public spheres shape learning experiences. It addresses a gap in the international distance education literature by highlighting the insufficient consideration of the social reproduction responsibilities played out in homeplaces. Our findings reveal that homeplace is neither a gender-neutral nor an idealised study environment. Instead, it leads to unequal participation in learning spaces and internationalisation efforts. Digital platforms, crucial for connectivity and collaboration in international education at a distance, also perpetuate gendered power dynamics that marginalise women's voices and contributions, but women, however, reach out and support each other in these online spaces. The research teases out the tensions between homeplace as a site for learning, living, and social reproduction, emphasising the need for international distance education institutions to address the gendered dynamics in their design and delivery that disproportionately burden those with responsibilities for social reproduction.

Practitioner notes

What is already known about this topic

  • International distance education focuses on distance education provided internationally.
  • Internationalisation at a Distance (IaD) activities aim to reach a broader audience beyond local students, leveraging online and blended learning models.
  • IaD activities depend on the home as one of the main spaces of study while seeing online platforms as the main point of internationalisation.
  • Thus far, the literature on IaD has not undertaken a critical feminist analysis or deployed Black feminist theories to explore power relations in such spaces.

What this paper adds

  • Examines how the politics of the “homeplace” can be used to understand the educational experiences of international distance education students.
  • Argues that current debates often overlook how the homeplace as a gendered site influences students' international distance education journeys.
  • Highlights the gendered nature of the homeplace and complexities of studying from home and online, particularly for women
  • Provides a critical feminist analysis of IaD, situating and problematising the homeplace as the main site for IaD.

Implications for practice and/or policy

  • Emphasises the need for institutional policies that consider the homeplace as a significant site for internationalisation at a distance.
  • Recommends the development of support systems and resources to help students manage conflicting demands of home and study.
  • Advocates for a more nuanced approach to distance education that addresses the diverse needs of students, including those balancing significant responsibilities like employment and family obligations.
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
British Journal of Educational Technology
British Journal of Educational Technology EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
15.60
自引率
4.50%
发文量
111
期刊介绍: BJET is a primary source for academics and professionals in the fields of digital educational and training technology throughout the world. The Journal is published by Wiley on behalf of The British Educational Research Association (BERA). It publishes theoretical perspectives, methodological developments and high quality empirical research that demonstrate whether and how applications of instructional/educational technology systems, networks, tools and resources lead to improvements in formal and non-formal education at all levels, from early years through to higher, technical and vocational education, professional development and corporate training.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信