Collaborative Cell Groups: Bridging separation in the Community of Inquiry in a context of Internationalization at a Distance

IF 6.7 1区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
Yun Yue, Jeannette Keser, Feng Li, Yishu Liu, Weijuan Yu
{"title":"Collaborative Cell Groups: Bridging separation in the Community of Inquiry in a context of Internationalization at a Distance","authors":"Yun Yue,&nbsp;Jeannette Keser,&nbsp;Feng Li,&nbsp;Yishu Liu,&nbsp;Weijuan Yu","doi":"10.1111/bjet.13561","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <section>\n \n \n <p>The internationalization of higher education increasingly involves ‘Internationalization at a Distance’ (IaD), a modality that alters how students engage with learning communities across geographical and cultural divides. Despite its growing prevalence, the complexity of fostering student engagement in transnational settings remains underexplored. This study investigates the application of the Community of Inquiry (CoI) framework—comprising teaching, cognitive and social presence—within a transnational Master of Education programme delivered jointly by an Australian university and a Chinese educational institute. Findings reveal significant challenges in achieving robust CoI elements due to geographical separation and cultural disparities, which undermine effective engagement. In response, students developed Collaborative Cell Groups, informal, peer-led communities that enhance engagement by localizing knowledge, fostering social cohesion and supplementing teaching presence. These groups illustrate both the potential and limitations of informal peer support within formal learning structures. By critically examining the interplay between formal and informal learning communities, this study offers new insights into optimizing engagement in cross-cultural distance education.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <div>\n \n <div>\n \n <h3>Practitioner notes</h3>\n <p>What is already known about this topic?\n\n </p><ul>\n \n <li>The Community of Inquiry (CoI) framework has been widely recognized for structuring online learning environments by fostering cognitive, social and teaching presence to support meaningful learning experiences.</li>\n \n <li>Prior research has primarily examined the application of the CoI framework in domestic online education settings, with limited exploration of its effectiveness and challenges in cross-cultural or transnational contexts like Internationalization at a Distance (IaD).</li>\n \n <li>Existing studies suggest that while the CoI framework can provide a structured approach to enhancing engagement, its ability to fully support student participation may be hindered by factors, such as geographical separation and cultural disparities.</li>\n </ul>\n <p>What this paper adds\n\n </p><ul>\n \n <li>This study highlights the limitations of the CoI framework in fully supporting student engagement within IaD settings. Specifically, it demonstrates how cultural and geographical divides between students and instructors can hinder the effective establishment of teaching, cognitive and social presence.</li>\n \n <li>To address these challenges, the paper introduces the concept of Collaborative Cell Groups (CCGs)—informal, peer-led communities strategically designed to enhance engagement. By localizing knowledge, fostering culturally responsive peer support, and bridging social and cognitive divides, CCGs complement and extend the CoI framework. Unlike general social media-based interactions, CCGs operate with a structured intent to overcome the unique barriers faced in transnational and cross-cultural educational contexts.</li>\n </ul>\n <p>Implications for practice and/or policy\n\n </p><ul>\n \n <li>Educational institutions should consider facilitating the formation of peer-led informal learning groups to support student engagement and learning outcomes in transnational education programmes.</li>\n \n <li>Policies should emphasize the need for culturally adaptive learning frameworks that integrate both formal instructional guidance and informal peer collaboration to overcome the challenges of geographically and culturally dispersed learning environments.</li>\n </ul>\n </div>\n </div>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":48315,"journal":{"name":"British Journal of Educational Technology","volume":"56 2","pages":"967-987"},"PeriodicalIF":6.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"British Journal of Educational Technology","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/bjet.13561","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The internationalization of higher education increasingly involves ‘Internationalization at a Distance’ (IaD), a modality that alters how students engage with learning communities across geographical and cultural divides. Despite its growing prevalence, the complexity of fostering student engagement in transnational settings remains underexplored. This study investigates the application of the Community of Inquiry (CoI) framework—comprising teaching, cognitive and social presence—within a transnational Master of Education programme delivered jointly by an Australian university and a Chinese educational institute. Findings reveal significant challenges in achieving robust CoI elements due to geographical separation and cultural disparities, which undermine effective engagement. In response, students developed Collaborative Cell Groups, informal, peer-led communities that enhance engagement by localizing knowledge, fostering social cohesion and supplementing teaching presence. These groups illustrate both the potential and limitations of informal peer support within formal learning structures. By critically examining the interplay between formal and informal learning communities, this study offers new insights into optimizing engagement in cross-cultural distance education.

Practitioner notes

What is already known about this topic?

  • The Community of Inquiry (CoI) framework has been widely recognized for structuring online learning environments by fostering cognitive, social and teaching presence to support meaningful learning experiences.
  • Prior research has primarily examined the application of the CoI framework in domestic online education settings, with limited exploration of its effectiveness and challenges in cross-cultural or transnational contexts like Internationalization at a Distance (IaD).
  • Existing studies suggest that while the CoI framework can provide a structured approach to enhancing engagement, its ability to fully support student participation may be hindered by factors, such as geographical separation and cultural disparities.

What this paper adds

  • This study highlights the limitations of the CoI framework in fully supporting student engagement within IaD settings. Specifically, it demonstrates how cultural and geographical divides between students and instructors can hinder the effective establishment of teaching, cognitive and social presence.
  • To address these challenges, the paper introduces the concept of Collaborative Cell Groups (CCGs)—informal, peer-led communities strategically designed to enhance engagement. By localizing knowledge, fostering culturally responsive peer support, and bridging social and cognitive divides, CCGs complement and extend the CoI framework. Unlike general social media-based interactions, CCGs operate with a structured intent to overcome the unique barriers faced in transnational and cross-cultural educational contexts.

Implications for practice and/or policy

  • Educational institutions should consider facilitating the formation of peer-led informal learning groups to support student engagement and learning outcomes in transnational education programmes.
  • Policies should emphasize the need for culturally adaptive learning frameworks that integrate both formal instructional guidance and informal peer collaboration to overcome the challenges of geographically and culturally dispersed learning environments.
协作细胞组:在国际化的远距离背景下,在调查社区中弥合分离
高等教育的国际化越来越多地涉及“远程国际化”(IaD),这是一种改变学生与跨越地理和文化鸿沟的学习社区互动方式的模式。尽管越来越普遍,但在跨国环境中培养学生参与的复杂性仍未得到充分探讨。本研究调查了探究共同体(CoI)框架——包括教学、认知和社会存在——在澳大利亚一所大学和一所中国教育机构联合提供的跨国教育硕士项目中的应用。调查结果显示,由于地理隔离和文化差异,在实现强大的CoI元素方面存在重大挑战,这破坏了有效的参与。作为回应,学生们建立了协作小组,这是一种非正式的、由同伴领导的社区,通过本地化知识、促进社会凝聚力和补充教学存在来提高参与度。这些群体说明了在正式学习结构中非正式同伴支持的潜力和局限性。通过批判性地考察正式和非正式学习社区之间的相互作用,本研究为优化跨文化远程教育的参与提供了新的见解。关于这个主题我们已经知道了什么?探究社区(CoI)框架通过促进认知、社会和教学存在来支持有意义的学习体验,从而构建在线学习环境,已得到广泛认可。先前的研究主要考察了CoI框架在国内在线教育环境中的应用,而对其在跨文化或跨国背景下(如远程国际化)的有效性和挑战的探索有限。现有的研究表明,虽然CoI框架可以提供一种结构化的方法来增强参与,但其充分支持学生参与的能力可能会受到地理分隔和文化差异等因素的阻碍。本研究强调了CoI框架在充分支持IaD环境下学生参与方面的局限性。具体来说,它展示了学生和教师之间的文化和地理差异如何阻碍教学、认知和社会存在的有效建立。为了应对这些挑战,本文介绍了协作小区(ccg)的概念,这是一种非正式的、以同伴为主导的社区,旨在加强参与。通过将知识本地化,促进具有文化响应性的同伴支持,弥合社会和认知鸿沟,CCGs补充并扩展了CoI框架。与一般的基于社交媒体的互动不同,ccg的运作具有结构化的意图,以克服跨国和跨文化教育背景下面临的独特障碍。对实践和/或政策的影响教育机构应考虑促进同伴领导的非正式学习小组的形成,以支持学生参与和跨国教育项目的学习成果。政策应强调需要有文化适应性的学习框架,将正式的教学指导和非正式的同伴合作结合起来,以克服地理和文化分散的学习环境的挑战。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
British Journal of Educational Technology
British Journal of Educational Technology EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
15.60
自引率
4.50%
发文量
111
期刊介绍: BJET is a primary source for academics and professionals in the fields of digital educational and training technology throughout the world. The Journal is published by Wiley on behalf of The British Educational Research Association (BERA). It publishes theoretical perspectives, methodological developments and high quality empirical research that demonstrate whether and how applications of instructional/educational technology systems, networks, tools and resources lead to improvements in formal and non-formal education at all levels, from early years through to higher, technical and vocational education, professional development and corporate training.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信