Collaborative Cell Groups: Bridging separation in the Community of Inquiry in a context of Internationalization at a Distance

IF 6.7 1区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
Yun Yue, Jeannette Keser, Feng Li, Yishu Liu, Weijuan Yu
{"title":"Collaborative Cell Groups: Bridging separation in the Community of Inquiry in a context of Internationalization at a Distance","authors":"Yun Yue,&nbsp;Jeannette Keser,&nbsp;Feng Li,&nbsp;Yishu Liu,&nbsp;Weijuan Yu","doi":"10.1111/bjet.13561","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <section>\n \n \n <p>The internationalization of higher education increasingly involves ‘Internationalization at a Distance’ (IaD), a modality that alters how students engage with learning communities across geographical and cultural divides. Despite its growing prevalence, the complexity of fostering student engagement in transnational settings remains underexplored. This study investigates the application of the Community of Inquiry (CoI) framework—comprising teaching, cognitive and social presence—within a transnational Master of Education programme delivered jointly by an Australian university and a Chinese educational institute. Findings reveal significant challenges in achieving robust CoI elements due to geographical separation and cultural disparities, which undermine effective engagement. In response, students developed Collaborative Cell Groups, informal, peer-led communities that enhance engagement by localizing knowledge, fostering social cohesion and supplementing teaching presence. These groups illustrate both the potential and limitations of informal peer support within formal learning structures. By critically examining the interplay between formal and informal learning communities, this study offers new insights into optimizing engagement in cross-cultural distance education.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <div>\n \n <div>\n \n <h3>Practitioner notes</h3>\n <p>What is already known about this topic?\n\n </p><ul>\n \n <li>The Community of Inquiry (CoI) framework has been widely recognized for structuring online learning environments by fostering cognitive, social and teaching presence to support meaningful learning experiences.</li>\n \n <li>Prior research has primarily examined the application of the CoI framework in domestic online education settings, with limited exploration of its effectiveness and challenges in cross-cultural or transnational contexts like Internationalization at a Distance (IaD).</li>\n \n <li>Existing studies suggest that while the CoI framework can provide a structured approach to enhancing engagement, its ability to fully support student participation may be hindered by factors, such as geographical separation and cultural disparities.</li>\n </ul>\n <p>What this paper adds\n\n </p><ul>\n \n <li>This study highlights the limitations of the CoI framework in fully supporting student engagement within IaD settings. Specifically, it demonstrates how cultural and geographical divides between students and instructors can hinder the effective establishment of teaching, cognitive and social presence.</li>\n \n <li>To address these challenges, the paper introduces the concept of Collaborative Cell Groups (CCGs)—informal, peer-led communities strategically designed to enhance engagement. By localizing knowledge, fostering culturally responsive peer support, and bridging social and cognitive divides, CCGs complement and extend the CoI framework. Unlike general social media-based interactions, CCGs operate with a structured intent to overcome the unique barriers faced in transnational and cross-cultural educational contexts.</li>\n </ul>\n <p>Implications for practice and/or policy\n\n </p><ul>\n \n <li>Educational institutions should consider facilitating the formation of peer-led informal learning groups to support student engagement and learning outcomes in transnational education programmes.</li>\n \n <li>Policies should emphasize the need for culturally adaptive learning frameworks that integrate both formal instructional guidance and informal peer collaboration to overcome the challenges of geographically and culturally dispersed learning environments.</li>\n </ul>\n </div>\n </div>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":48315,"journal":{"name":"British Journal of Educational Technology","volume":"56 2","pages":"967-987"},"PeriodicalIF":6.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"British Journal of Educational Technology","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/bjet.13561","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The internationalization of higher education increasingly involves ‘Internationalization at a Distance’ (IaD), a modality that alters how students engage with learning communities across geographical and cultural divides. Despite its growing prevalence, the complexity of fostering student engagement in transnational settings remains underexplored. This study investigates the application of the Community of Inquiry (CoI) framework—comprising teaching, cognitive and social presence—within a transnational Master of Education programme delivered jointly by an Australian university and a Chinese educational institute. Findings reveal significant challenges in achieving robust CoI elements due to geographical separation and cultural disparities, which undermine effective engagement. In response, students developed Collaborative Cell Groups, informal, peer-led communities that enhance engagement by localizing knowledge, fostering social cohesion and supplementing teaching presence. These groups illustrate both the potential and limitations of informal peer support within formal learning structures. By critically examining the interplay between formal and informal learning communities, this study offers new insights into optimizing engagement in cross-cultural distance education.

Practitioner notes

What is already known about this topic?

  • The Community of Inquiry (CoI) framework has been widely recognized for structuring online learning environments by fostering cognitive, social and teaching presence to support meaningful learning experiences.
  • Prior research has primarily examined the application of the CoI framework in domestic online education settings, with limited exploration of its effectiveness and challenges in cross-cultural or transnational contexts like Internationalization at a Distance (IaD).
  • Existing studies suggest that while the CoI framework can provide a structured approach to enhancing engagement, its ability to fully support student participation may be hindered by factors, such as geographical separation and cultural disparities.

What this paper adds

  • This study highlights the limitations of the CoI framework in fully supporting student engagement within IaD settings. Specifically, it demonstrates how cultural and geographical divides between students and instructors can hinder the effective establishment of teaching, cognitive and social presence.
  • To address these challenges, the paper introduces the concept of Collaborative Cell Groups (CCGs)—informal, peer-led communities strategically designed to enhance engagement. By localizing knowledge, fostering culturally responsive peer support, and bridging social and cognitive divides, CCGs complement and extend the CoI framework. Unlike general social media-based interactions, CCGs operate with a structured intent to overcome the unique barriers faced in transnational and cross-cultural educational contexts.

Implications for practice and/or policy

  • Educational institutions should consider facilitating the formation of peer-led informal learning groups to support student engagement and learning outcomes in transnational education programmes.
  • Policies should emphasize the need for culturally adaptive learning frameworks that integrate both formal instructional guidance and informal peer collaboration to overcome the challenges of geographically and culturally dispersed learning environments.
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
British Journal of Educational Technology
British Journal of Educational Technology EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
15.60
自引率
4.50%
发文量
111
期刊介绍: BJET is a primary source for academics and professionals in the fields of digital educational and training technology throughout the world. The Journal is published by Wiley on behalf of The British Educational Research Association (BERA). It publishes theoretical perspectives, methodological developments and high quality empirical research that demonstrate whether and how applications of instructional/educational technology systems, networks, tools and resources lead to improvements in formal and non-formal education at all levels, from early years through to higher, technical and vocational education, professional development and corporate training.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信