Bioprecariousness and vulnerability: An ethical approach to the issues of access to public health

Q3 Medicine
S. Jimeno Ramírez
{"title":"Bioprecariousness and vulnerability: An ethical approach to the issues of access to public health","authors":"S. Jimeno Ramírez","doi":"10.1016/j.jemep.2025.101066","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>During the Covid-19 pandemics, the access to patented products (vaccines) become a problem of public health due to their high prices, especially in the least developed countries. Buth the concept of access is also related to other health care-related issues.</div></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><div>This paper seeks to analyse these problems of access in public health by using the notion of bioprecariousness, that we generally define as the structural violence against life due to the lack of access to essential resources for life.</div></div><div><h3>Methodology</h3><div>We shall analyse bioprecariousness by means of literature concerned to the concept of vulnerability, health disparities and IP legislation and shall assess the negative impact of bioprecariousness on global health equity.</div></div><div><h3>Findings</h3><div>We shall present a taxonomy of bioprecariousness considering three different dimensions of health care in form of pharmacological, digital, and care-related bioprecariousness. From that point, we will explore the effects of each kind of bioprecariousness on public health, given that it increases vulnerability and health inequities simultaneously.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Bioprecariousness is a concept closely related to vulnerability, which results in important health disparities and unjust distribution of health-related resources, thereby increasing health inequities. We propose to address the issues related to bioprecariousness by applying adequate government policies.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":37707,"journal":{"name":"Ethics, Medicine and Public Health","volume":"33 ","pages":"Article 101066"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ethics, Medicine and Public Health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352552525000258","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

During the Covid-19 pandemics, the access to patented products (vaccines) become a problem of public health due to their high prices, especially in the least developed countries. Buth the concept of access is also related to other health care-related issues.

Objective

This paper seeks to analyse these problems of access in public health by using the notion of bioprecariousness, that we generally define as the structural violence against life due to the lack of access to essential resources for life.

Methodology

We shall analyse bioprecariousness by means of literature concerned to the concept of vulnerability, health disparities and IP legislation and shall assess the negative impact of bioprecariousness on global health equity.

Findings

We shall present a taxonomy of bioprecariousness considering three different dimensions of health care in form of pharmacological, digital, and care-related bioprecariousness. From that point, we will explore the effects of each kind of bioprecariousness on public health, given that it increases vulnerability and health inequities simultaneously.

Conclusion

Bioprecariousness is a concept closely related to vulnerability, which results in important health disparities and unjust distribution of health-related resources, thereby increasing health inequities. We propose to address the issues related to bioprecariousness by applying adequate government policies.
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Ethics, Medicine and Public Health
Ethics, Medicine and Public Health Medicine-Health Policy
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
107
审稿时长
42 days
期刊介绍: This review aims to compare approaches to medical ethics and bioethics in two forms, Anglo-Saxon (Ethics, Medicine and Public Health) and French (Ethique, Médecine et Politiques Publiques). Thus, in their native languages, the authors will present research on the legitimacy of the practice and appreciation of the consequences of acts towards patients as compared to the limits acceptable by the community, as illustrated by the democratic debate.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信