The taste of change? Free vegan meal boxes do not change meat consumption, self-efficacy, or attitudes toward a plant-based diet among meat eaters

IF 4.9 1区 农林科学 Q1 FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY
Philipp Sprengholz , Lina Hammer , Linda Scheelje
{"title":"The taste of change? Free vegan meal boxes do not change meat consumption, self-efficacy, or attitudes toward a plant-based diet among meat eaters","authors":"Philipp Sprengholz ,&nbsp;Lina Hammer ,&nbsp;Linda Scheelje","doi":"10.1016/j.foodqual.2025.105471","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Excessive meat consumption is associated with health and environmental problems. Previous research has shown that the reasons for meat consumption are diverse and often include low self-efficacy beliefs in preparing alternative meals. In an experiment with 71 German participants, we investigated whether the delivery of meal boxes containing ingredients and recipes for three plant-based meals could increase self-efficacy, reduce meat consumption, and improve attitudes toward a vegan diet. No significant differences were found between the control group and the meal box recipients after the intervention. While recipients frequently liked the plant-based meals and could imagine preparing them again, the intervention did not increase their self-efficacy beliefs or affect their meat consumption. These findings indicate that the potential of meal box deliveries to alter dietary patterns may be limited.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":322,"journal":{"name":"Food Quality and Preference","volume":"128 ","pages":"Article 105471"},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Food Quality and Preference","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0950329325000461","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Excessive meat consumption is associated with health and environmental problems. Previous research has shown that the reasons for meat consumption are diverse and often include low self-efficacy beliefs in preparing alternative meals. In an experiment with 71 German participants, we investigated whether the delivery of meal boxes containing ingredients and recipes for three plant-based meals could increase self-efficacy, reduce meat consumption, and improve attitudes toward a vegan diet. No significant differences were found between the control group and the meal box recipients after the intervention. While recipients frequently liked the plant-based meals and could imagine preparing them again, the intervention did not increase their self-efficacy beliefs or affect their meat consumption. These findings indicate that the potential of meal box deliveries to alter dietary patterns may be limited.
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Food Quality and Preference
Food Quality and Preference 工程技术-食品科技
CiteScore
10.40
自引率
15.10%
发文量
263
审稿时长
38 days
期刊介绍: Food Quality and Preference is a journal devoted to sensory, consumer and behavioural research in food and non-food products. It publishes original research, critical reviews, and short communications in sensory and consumer science, and sensometrics. In addition, the journal publishes special invited issues on important timely topics and from relevant conferences. These are aimed at bridging the gap between research and application, bringing together authors and readers in consumer and market research, sensory science, sensometrics and sensory evaluation, nutrition and food choice, as well as food research, product development and sensory quality assurance. Submissions to Food Quality and Preference are limited to papers that include some form of human measurement; papers that are limited to physical/chemical measures or the routine application of sensory, consumer or econometric analysis will not be considered unless they specifically make a novel scientific contribution in line with the journal''s coverage as outlined below.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信