Assessment and analysis of development risks under uncertainty: The impact of disruptive technologies on renewable energy development

IF 8 Q1 ENERGY & FUELS
Ibrahim Alrashdi , Ahmed M. Ali , Karam M. Sallam , Mohamed Abdel-Basset
{"title":"Assessment and analysis of development risks under uncertainty: The impact of disruptive technologies on renewable energy development","authors":"Ibrahim Alrashdi ,&nbsp;Ahmed M. Ali ,&nbsp;Karam M. Sallam ,&nbsp;Mohamed Abdel-Basset","doi":"10.1016/j.nexus.2025.100371","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Renewable energy (RE) is gaining great attention nowadays, as opposed to traditional energy, such as fossil fuels, which have various negative impacts and issues. RE faces multiple risks and challenges, so these risks need to be evaluated and mitigated such as technical risks, environmental risks, security risks, policy risks, and technological risks. This study proposed a multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method for assessing RE risks. The MCDM method is integrated with neutrosophic sets (NSs) to deal with inconsistent data in the evaluation process. Two MCDM methods are used in this study: Entropy and Ranking of Alternatives with Weights of Criterion (RAWEC). The neutrosophic entropy is used to compute the criteria weight, and the neutrosophic RAWEC method ranks the alternatives. This study applied the proposed method to two case studies. In the first case study, the RE risks are ranked. In the second case study, various strategies are proposed by blockchain, artificial intelligence (AI), the Internet of Things (IoT), big data, and zero-trust to reduce RE risks. There are six main factors; 31 sub-factors and 19 risks are used in the first case study, and 19 factors and 20 strategies are used in the second case study. The sensitivity analysis was conducted to show the stability of the rank. The proposed methodology was compared with MCDM methods such as neutrosophic TOPSIS, neutrosophic VIKOR, and fuzzy CoCoSo. The results show various proposed strategies can reduce RE risks.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":93548,"journal":{"name":"Energy nexus","volume":"17 ","pages":"Article 100371"},"PeriodicalIF":8.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Energy nexus","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772427125000129","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENERGY & FUELS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Renewable energy (RE) is gaining great attention nowadays, as opposed to traditional energy, such as fossil fuels, which have various negative impacts and issues. RE faces multiple risks and challenges, so these risks need to be evaluated and mitigated such as technical risks, environmental risks, security risks, policy risks, and technological risks. This study proposed a multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method for assessing RE risks. The MCDM method is integrated with neutrosophic sets (NSs) to deal with inconsistent data in the evaluation process. Two MCDM methods are used in this study: Entropy and Ranking of Alternatives with Weights of Criterion (RAWEC). The neutrosophic entropy is used to compute the criteria weight, and the neutrosophic RAWEC method ranks the alternatives. This study applied the proposed method to two case studies. In the first case study, the RE risks are ranked. In the second case study, various strategies are proposed by blockchain, artificial intelligence (AI), the Internet of Things (IoT), big data, and zero-trust to reduce RE risks. There are six main factors; 31 sub-factors and 19 risks are used in the first case study, and 19 factors and 20 strategies are used in the second case study. The sensitivity analysis was conducted to show the stability of the rank. The proposed methodology was compared with MCDM methods such as neutrosophic TOPSIS, neutrosophic VIKOR, and fuzzy CoCoSo. The results show various proposed strategies can reduce RE risks.
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Energy nexus
Energy nexus Energy (General), Ecological Modelling, Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment, Water Science and Technology, Agricultural and Biological Sciences (General)
CiteScore
7.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
109 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信