Factorial equilibrium analyses for socio-economic implications of emission trading

IF 16.3 1区 工程技术 Q1 ENERGY & FUELS
Xiaogui Zheng , Guohe Huang , Lirong Liu , Xiaoyue Zhang
{"title":"Factorial equilibrium analyses for socio-economic implications of emission trading","authors":"Xiaogui Zheng ,&nbsp;Guohe Huang ,&nbsp;Lirong Liu ,&nbsp;Xiaoyue Zhang","doi":"10.1016/j.rser.2025.115476","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>As the largest emitter of CO<sub>2</sub> emissions in the world, China has pledged to reach its CO<sub>2</sub> emission peak before 2030 and achieve carbon neutrality before 2060. In 2021, it implemented the policy of emission trading scheme to manage emissions from electricity sector. However, such a policy is unable to achieve its emission-mitigation target. This study aims to analyze the socio-economic effects of early carbon peak (i.e., before 2030) and sectoral coverage in emission trading scheme, as well as reveal the composite effects of multiple impact factors regarding the scheme and their interactions, through the development of a factorial emission-trading equilibrium model. It is found that the implementation of such policies would result in reductions in commodity output by sectors and further lead to the loss of real GDP. Specifically, the earlier the emission peak, the higher the GDP loss and carbon price. Meanwhile, the increase in the commodity price induced by the advance of the emission-peak point would result in a growth in commodity imports. Additionally, there are complex non-functional relationships that exist between industry coverage in emission trading scheme and the related multi-dimensional impact factors. The interactive relationships between emission-peak point and industry coverage in emission trading scheme would result in significant compound effects on the real GDP and carbon price, which are recommended to be considered while formulating relevant policies. Advance plans with corresponding allowances/benefits are also recommended to offset the impacts on households induced by implementing emission trading scheme-related policies.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":418,"journal":{"name":"Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews","volume":"214 ","pages":"Article 115476"},"PeriodicalIF":16.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews","FirstCategoryId":"1","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1364032125001492","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENERGY & FUELS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

As the largest emitter of CO2 emissions in the world, China has pledged to reach its CO2 emission peak before 2030 and achieve carbon neutrality before 2060. In 2021, it implemented the policy of emission trading scheme to manage emissions from electricity sector. However, such a policy is unable to achieve its emission-mitigation target. This study aims to analyze the socio-economic effects of early carbon peak (i.e., before 2030) and sectoral coverage in emission trading scheme, as well as reveal the composite effects of multiple impact factors regarding the scheme and their interactions, through the development of a factorial emission-trading equilibrium model. It is found that the implementation of such policies would result in reductions in commodity output by sectors and further lead to the loss of real GDP. Specifically, the earlier the emission peak, the higher the GDP loss and carbon price. Meanwhile, the increase in the commodity price induced by the advance of the emission-peak point would result in a growth in commodity imports. Additionally, there are complex non-functional relationships that exist between industry coverage in emission trading scheme and the related multi-dimensional impact factors. The interactive relationships between emission-peak point and industry coverage in emission trading scheme would result in significant compound effects on the real GDP and carbon price, which are recommended to be considered while formulating relevant policies. Advance plans with corresponding allowances/benefits are also recommended to offset the impacts on households induced by implementing emission trading scheme-related policies.

Abstract Image

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews
Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 工程技术-能源与燃料
CiteScore
31.20
自引率
5.70%
发文量
1055
审稿时长
62 days
期刊介绍: The mission of Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews is to disseminate the most compelling and pertinent critical insights in renewable and sustainable energy, fostering collaboration among the research community, private sector, and policy and decision makers. The journal aims to exchange challenges, solutions, innovative concepts, and technologies, contributing to sustainable development, the transition to a low-carbon future, and the attainment of emissions targets outlined by the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews publishes a diverse range of content, including review papers, original research, case studies, and analyses of new technologies, all featuring a substantial review component such as critique, comparison, or analysis. Introducing a distinctive paper type, Expert Insights, the journal presents commissioned mini-reviews authored by field leaders, addressing topics of significant interest. Case studies undergo consideration only if they showcase the work's applicability to other regions or contribute valuable insights to the broader field of renewable and sustainable energy. Notably, a bibliographic or literature review lacking critical analysis is deemed unsuitable for publication.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信