{"title":"Dynamic policy pathfinding for balanced growth of energy trilemma: Evidence from the world's large energy-consuming economies","authors":"Masoud Shirazi","doi":"10.1016/j.rser.2025.115493","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The balance scales of energy trilemma dimensions e.g., energy equity, energy security, and environmental sustainability, are changing, requiring a regime-switching with time-varying transition path forward. Accordingly, this research first studies how the trade-offs between energy trilemma dimensions are formed through different regimes in the twenty-five large energy consumers during 2004–2021. Then, the time-varying transition of the switching states in response to the hydrogen economy and geopolitical risks is investigated. To that end, a Markov-switching panel vector autoregressive method with time-varying transition is applied. Finally, this research assesses the performance of energy trilemma in response to a change in the pivotal policy instruments, using the generalized method of moments estimator. The regime-switching impulse-response analysis supports the short-term trade-offs between the dimensions under two regimes. Further, the development of the hydrogen economy increases the p-value of remaining in regime 1 as the dominant regime with the trade-offs; “upward”, “downward”, and “upward” states for the dimensions respectively, while the escalation of geopolitical risks declines the transition probability from regime 2 into regime 1. Finally, the existence of a causal and long-term relationship between energy trilemma and the policy instruments is assessed through the generalized method of moments. The policymakers should present the role of green transition, complexity, and geostrategy policies on nonlinear trade-offs between the dimensions is crucial for ensuring energy equity, maintaining energy security, and accelerating environmental sustainability and hence, a regime-switching balanced growth of energy trilemma. This vital structure is essential for inclusive, orderly, and just energy transition.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":418,"journal":{"name":"Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews","volume":"214 ","pages":"Article 115493"},"PeriodicalIF":16.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews","FirstCategoryId":"1","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1364032125001662","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENERGY & FUELS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The balance scales of energy trilemma dimensions e.g., energy equity, energy security, and environmental sustainability, are changing, requiring a regime-switching with time-varying transition path forward. Accordingly, this research first studies how the trade-offs between energy trilemma dimensions are formed through different regimes in the twenty-five large energy consumers during 2004–2021. Then, the time-varying transition of the switching states in response to the hydrogen economy and geopolitical risks is investigated. To that end, a Markov-switching panel vector autoregressive method with time-varying transition is applied. Finally, this research assesses the performance of energy trilemma in response to a change in the pivotal policy instruments, using the generalized method of moments estimator. The regime-switching impulse-response analysis supports the short-term trade-offs between the dimensions under two regimes. Further, the development of the hydrogen economy increases the p-value of remaining in regime 1 as the dominant regime with the trade-offs; “upward”, “downward”, and “upward” states for the dimensions respectively, while the escalation of geopolitical risks declines the transition probability from regime 2 into regime 1. Finally, the existence of a causal and long-term relationship between energy trilemma and the policy instruments is assessed through the generalized method of moments. The policymakers should present the role of green transition, complexity, and geostrategy policies on nonlinear trade-offs between the dimensions is crucial for ensuring energy equity, maintaining energy security, and accelerating environmental sustainability and hence, a regime-switching balanced growth of energy trilemma. This vital structure is essential for inclusive, orderly, and just energy transition.
期刊介绍:
The mission of Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews is to disseminate the most compelling and pertinent critical insights in renewable and sustainable energy, fostering collaboration among the research community, private sector, and policy and decision makers. The journal aims to exchange challenges, solutions, innovative concepts, and technologies, contributing to sustainable development, the transition to a low-carbon future, and the attainment of emissions targets outlined by the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change.
Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews publishes a diverse range of content, including review papers, original research, case studies, and analyses of new technologies, all featuring a substantial review component such as critique, comparison, or analysis. Introducing a distinctive paper type, Expert Insights, the journal presents commissioned mini-reviews authored by field leaders, addressing topics of significant interest. Case studies undergo consideration only if they showcase the work's applicability to other regions or contribute valuable insights to the broader field of renewable and sustainable energy. Notably, a bibliographic or literature review lacking critical analysis is deemed unsuitable for publication.