How the nature of social media platforms supports faulty knowledge production by influencers: The case of nutrition guidance for mothers on Chinese social media

IF 2.3 2区 文学 Q1 COMMUNICATION
David Machin , Per Ledin , Wenting Zhao
{"title":"How the nature of social media platforms supports faulty knowledge production by influencers: The case of nutrition guidance for mothers on Chinese social media","authors":"David Machin ,&nbsp;Per Ledin ,&nbsp;Wenting Zhao","doi":"10.1016/j.dcm.2025.100866","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Using the case of nutrition influencers on Chinese Weibo, this paper considers how social media platforms shape knowledge production and the representation of expertise. It is known that members of the public now mainly obtain information about health, illness on social media, chiefly through social media influencers. This creates concern for health professionals, given that such information tends to be highly misleading. Here we use multimodal critical discourse analysis, to analyse a sample of Weibo hashtags, to learn more about, not so much how this knowledge is incorrect, but how social media platforms themselves foster forms of knowledge where accuracy and clarity of knowledge in relation to details of issues, objectives and causalities is not favoured. We find a form of faux-expertise, which is legitimized through vaguer small stories about everyday life where the solutions presented are absent of clear problem-identification and of causal connections. We ask what this means as social media platforms become colonized ways of sharing and engaging with all forms of knowledge in our societies.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":46649,"journal":{"name":"Discourse Context & Media","volume":"64 ","pages":"Article 100866"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Discourse Context & Media","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2211695825000157","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"COMMUNICATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Using the case of nutrition influencers on Chinese Weibo, this paper considers how social media platforms shape knowledge production and the representation of expertise. It is known that members of the public now mainly obtain information about health, illness on social media, chiefly through social media influencers. This creates concern for health professionals, given that such information tends to be highly misleading. Here we use multimodal critical discourse analysis, to analyse a sample of Weibo hashtags, to learn more about, not so much how this knowledge is incorrect, but how social media platforms themselves foster forms of knowledge where accuracy and clarity of knowledge in relation to details of issues, objectives and causalities is not favoured. We find a form of faux-expertise, which is legitimized through vaguer small stories about everyday life where the solutions presented are absent of clear problem-identification and of causal connections. We ask what this means as social media platforms become colonized ways of sharing and engaging with all forms of knowledge in our societies.
社交媒体平台的性质如何支持网红的错误知识生产:以中国社交媒体上的妈妈营养指导为例
本文以中国微博上的营养影响者为例,研究了社交媒体平台如何塑造知识生产和专业知识的表现。众所周知,公众现在主要通过社交媒体上的影响者获取有关健康、疾病的信息。这引起了卫生专业人员的关注,因为这类信息往往极具误导性。在这里,我们使用多模态批评话语分析来分析微博标签样本,更多地了解,不是这些知识是如何不正确的,而是社交媒体平台本身是如何培养知识形式的,在这些形式中,与问题、目标和因果关系的细节相关的知识的准确性和清晰度是不受欢迎的。我们发现了一种虚假的专业知识,它通过关于日常生活的模糊的小故事来合法化,其中提出的解决方案缺乏明确的问题识别和因果关系。我们想知道,随着社交媒体平台成为我们社会中分享和参与各种形式知识的殖民方式,这意味着什么。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Discourse Context & Media
Discourse Context & Media COMMUNICATION-
CiteScore
5.00
自引率
10.00%
发文量
46
审稿时长
55 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信