Economic policy uncertainty and renewable energy transition: Assessing the impact of resource richness, environmental technology, and environmental governance

IF 9 1区 工程技术 Q1 ENERGY & FUELS
Cai Li , Agyemang Kwasi Sampene , John Wiredu , Takyi Kwabena Nsiah
{"title":"Economic policy uncertainty and renewable energy transition: Assessing the impact of resource richness, environmental technology, and environmental governance","authors":"Cai Li ,&nbsp;Agyemang Kwasi Sampene ,&nbsp;John Wiredu ,&nbsp;Takyi Kwabena Nsiah","doi":"10.1016/j.renene.2025.122670","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The urgency of transitioning to renewable energy is a core priority under the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). However, economic policy uncertainty (EPU) remains a significant challenge in achieving a stable and sustained renewable energy transition (RET), particularly in resource-rich regions such as the Arctic Council countries (Sweden, the United States, Finland, Norway, Canada, Russia, and Denmark). Despite the wealth of literature on RET, research on the Arctic region remains scarce, particularly regarding the interplay between EPU, resource abundance, environmental technology, and governance. This research fills the gap by examining the impact of these factors on RET in the Arctic from 1990 to 2020, employing the Method of moment quantile regression (MMQR) approach to capture heterogeneous effects across different quantiles of RET distribution. The empirical findings reveal that a 1 % rise in economic policy uncertainty leads to a decline in RET between 0.287 % and 0.557 % across different quartiles, indicating a robust negative impact. Conversely, a 1 % increase in natural resource endowment (0.108 %–0.402 %), environmental technology (0.408 %–0.810 %), and environmental governance (0.216 %–0.633 %) enhances RET, with varying degrees of intensity across RET distributions. Additionally, the robustness analysis, conducted through DOLS and FMOLS, reaffirms the inverse and strong dynamics between economic policy uncertainty and RET, underscoring that policy instability disproportionately affects lower quantiles of RET. The policy implications are threefold. First, Arctic nations must implement stabilized and predictable economic policies to mitigate uncertainty, as fluctuations in economic policy hinder investment in renewable infrastructure. Second, policies should prioritize resource allocation towards clean energy development, ensuring that natural resource wealth is not solely invested into conventional energy sectors but redirected to facilitate RET. Lastly, enhancing environmental technology and governance frameworks through targeted investments and regulatory incentives will further accelerate the transition toward clean energy.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":419,"journal":{"name":"Renewable Energy","volume":"244 ","pages":"Article 122670"},"PeriodicalIF":9.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Renewable Energy","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0960148125003325","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENERGY & FUELS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The urgency of transitioning to renewable energy is a core priority under the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). However, economic policy uncertainty (EPU) remains a significant challenge in achieving a stable and sustained renewable energy transition (RET), particularly in resource-rich regions such as the Arctic Council countries (Sweden, the United States, Finland, Norway, Canada, Russia, and Denmark). Despite the wealth of literature on RET, research on the Arctic region remains scarce, particularly regarding the interplay between EPU, resource abundance, environmental technology, and governance. This research fills the gap by examining the impact of these factors on RET in the Arctic from 1990 to 2020, employing the Method of moment quantile regression (MMQR) approach to capture heterogeneous effects across different quantiles of RET distribution. The empirical findings reveal that a 1 % rise in economic policy uncertainty leads to a decline in RET between 0.287 % and 0.557 % across different quartiles, indicating a robust negative impact. Conversely, a 1 % increase in natural resource endowment (0.108 %–0.402 %), environmental technology (0.408 %–0.810 %), and environmental governance (0.216 %–0.633 %) enhances RET, with varying degrees of intensity across RET distributions. Additionally, the robustness analysis, conducted through DOLS and FMOLS, reaffirms the inverse and strong dynamics between economic policy uncertainty and RET, underscoring that policy instability disproportionately affects lower quantiles of RET. The policy implications are threefold. First, Arctic nations must implement stabilized and predictable economic policies to mitigate uncertainty, as fluctuations in economic policy hinder investment in renewable infrastructure. Second, policies should prioritize resource allocation towards clean energy development, ensuring that natural resource wealth is not solely invested into conventional energy sectors but redirected to facilitate RET. Lastly, enhancing environmental technology and governance frameworks through targeted investments and regulatory incentives will further accelerate the transition toward clean energy.

Abstract Image

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Renewable Energy
Renewable Energy 工程技术-能源与燃料
CiteScore
18.40
自引率
9.20%
发文量
1955
审稿时长
6.6 months
期刊介绍: Renewable Energy journal is dedicated to advancing knowledge and disseminating insights on various topics and technologies within renewable energy systems and components. Our mission is to support researchers, engineers, economists, manufacturers, NGOs, associations, and societies in staying updated on new developments in their respective fields and applying alternative energy solutions to current practices. As an international, multidisciplinary journal in renewable energy engineering and research, we strive to be a premier peer-reviewed platform and a trusted source of original research and reviews in the field of renewable energy. Join us in our endeavor to drive innovation and progress in sustainable energy solutions.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信