Differences in immunogenicity of TP53-mutated cancers with low tumor mutational burden (TMB) A study on TP53mut endometrial-, ovarian- and triple-negative breast cancer

IF 7.6 1区 医学 Q1 ONCOLOGY
Katharina Steger , Heidelinde Fiegl , Barin Feroz , Katharina Leitner , Christian Marth , Hubert Hackl , Alain G. Zeimet
{"title":"Differences in immunogenicity of TP53-mutated cancers with low tumor mutational burden (TMB) A study on TP53mut endometrial-, ovarian- and triple-negative breast cancer","authors":"Katharina Steger ,&nbsp;Heidelinde Fiegl ,&nbsp;Barin Feroz ,&nbsp;Katharina Leitner ,&nbsp;Christian Marth ,&nbsp;Hubert Hackl ,&nbsp;Alain G. Zeimet","doi":"10.1016/j.ejca.2025.115320","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><div>To explore why in large phase III randomized clinical trials <em>TP53</em>-mutated (<em>TP53</em>mut) endometrial cancer (EC) was the only tumor showing survival benefit to immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) added to chemotherapy when compared with other low TMB <em>TP53</em>mut cancers, such as high-grade serous ovarian (HGSOC) and triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC).</div></div><div><h3>Experimental Design</h3><div>From 606 patients with one of the three mentioned cancers, “The Cancer Genome Atlas” data on clinical outcome, TMB and detailed composition of the tumor immune-microenvironment (TIME) (immune infiltrating cells, cytokines, and other immune-modulators) were compared using the Kruskal-Wallis test, followed by Pearson correlation. Prognostic value of studied variables was assessed by Kaplan-Meier and Cox-regression analyses.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>TMB was very low in all three <em>TP53</em>mut entities, being lowest in EC (median: 1.27 Mut/Mb; p &lt; 0.001). Interestingly, high TMB was significantly associated with improved clinical outcome in every entity, whereby best discrimination for PFS was found in EC (HR: 0.52). Compared to EC, immune-suppressing regulatory T-cells were higher in HGSOC and TNBC (p &lt; 0.001) and M2-like macrophages higher in HGSOC (p &lt; 0.001). In contrast, immune-activating mDCs were more prominent in EC than in HGSOC (p &lt; 0.001). Differential modulator expression analyses revealed highest discrimination for the immune-inhibiting <em>FOXP3</em>, <em>C1QA</em> and <em>XBP1</em>, which all exhibited lower levels in EC compared with HGSOC and TNBC (p &lt; 0.001).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Characteristics of TIME differ substantially among the assessed entities in terms that EC exhibits fewer immunosuppressive traits, expecting a higher likelihood for responding to ICIs, despite a very low TMB, whereas HGSOC and TNBC exhibit an immune hostile TIME.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":11980,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Cancer","volume":"219 ","pages":"Article 115320"},"PeriodicalIF":7.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Cancer","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0959804925001017","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose

To explore why in large phase III randomized clinical trials TP53-mutated (TP53mut) endometrial cancer (EC) was the only tumor showing survival benefit to immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) added to chemotherapy when compared with other low TMB TP53mut cancers, such as high-grade serous ovarian (HGSOC) and triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC).

Experimental Design

From 606 patients with one of the three mentioned cancers, “The Cancer Genome Atlas” data on clinical outcome, TMB and detailed composition of the tumor immune-microenvironment (TIME) (immune infiltrating cells, cytokines, and other immune-modulators) were compared using the Kruskal-Wallis test, followed by Pearson correlation. Prognostic value of studied variables was assessed by Kaplan-Meier and Cox-regression analyses.

Results

TMB was very low in all three TP53mut entities, being lowest in EC (median: 1.27 Mut/Mb; p < 0.001). Interestingly, high TMB was significantly associated with improved clinical outcome in every entity, whereby best discrimination for PFS was found in EC (HR: 0.52). Compared to EC, immune-suppressing regulatory T-cells were higher in HGSOC and TNBC (p < 0.001) and M2-like macrophages higher in HGSOC (p < 0.001). In contrast, immune-activating mDCs were more prominent in EC than in HGSOC (p < 0.001). Differential modulator expression analyses revealed highest discrimination for the immune-inhibiting FOXP3, C1QA and XBP1, which all exhibited lower levels in EC compared with HGSOC and TNBC (p < 0.001).

Conclusion

Characteristics of TIME differ substantially among the assessed entities in terms that EC exhibits fewer immunosuppressive traits, expecting a higher likelihood for responding to ICIs, despite a very low TMB, whereas HGSOC and TNBC exhibit an immune hostile TIME.
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
European Journal of Cancer
European Journal of Cancer 医学-肿瘤学
CiteScore
11.50
自引率
4.80%
发文量
953
审稿时长
23 days
期刊介绍: The European Journal of Cancer (EJC) serves as a comprehensive platform integrating preclinical, digital, translational, and clinical research across the spectrum of cancer. From epidemiology, carcinogenesis, and biology to groundbreaking innovations in cancer treatment and patient care, the journal covers a wide array of topics. We publish original research, reviews, previews, editorial comments, and correspondence, fostering dialogue and advancement in the fight against cancer. Join us in our mission to drive progress and improve outcomes in cancer research and patient care.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信