Pension provision in the farming sector – Lessons from Europe

IF 5.1 1区 社会学 Q1 GEOGRAPHY
Hana Hlochova , Bridget McNally , Michael T. Hayden , Anne Kinsella
{"title":"Pension provision in the farming sector – Lessons from Europe","authors":"Hana Hlochova ,&nbsp;Bridget McNally ,&nbsp;Michael T. Hayden ,&nbsp;Anne Kinsella","doi":"10.1016/j.jrurstud.2025.103596","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Pension security for the self-employed within the EU has been improved by recent pension reforms, nevertheless gaps persist, and the self-employed remain a vulnerable group in this regard. The self-employed in Ireland overall have lower levels of pension in comparison to those in employment and self-employed farmers have the lowest pension cover with many not planning to ever retire. This is despite the fact that self-employed farmers predominantly begin their working life earlier and spend a longer time in employment than the employed. The objective of this study is to assess the design of the social security pension system for farmers in five countries which have bespoke social security pension systems for farmers, to identify gaps in the current Irish social security pension system for farmers and highlight the need internationally for a bespoke system for farmers. The five countries examined, (Austria, Finland, France, Germany, and Poland) are members of the European Network of Agricultural Protection Systems (ENASP) which focuses on a broad spectrum of social security issues. Retirement pensions is one of its key areas of interest and thus the pension systems of these five countries provide an important benchmark for international comparison. In the Irish context, the findings suggest that Ireland lags in terms of its social security pension system, as it applies to farmers. Reform is needed to ensure full social welfare pension coverage for this cohort to protect their financial welfare in retirement and to support the farm succession process. We suggest some practical solutions in this regard.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":17002,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Rural Studies","volume":"116 ","pages":"Article 103596"},"PeriodicalIF":5.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Rural Studies","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0743016725000361","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GEOGRAPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Pension security for the self-employed within the EU has been improved by recent pension reforms, nevertheless gaps persist, and the self-employed remain a vulnerable group in this regard. The self-employed in Ireland overall have lower levels of pension in comparison to those in employment and self-employed farmers have the lowest pension cover with many not planning to ever retire. This is despite the fact that self-employed farmers predominantly begin their working life earlier and spend a longer time in employment than the employed. The objective of this study is to assess the design of the social security pension system for farmers in five countries which have bespoke social security pension systems for farmers, to identify gaps in the current Irish social security pension system for farmers and highlight the need internationally for a bespoke system for farmers. The five countries examined, (Austria, Finland, France, Germany, and Poland) are members of the European Network of Agricultural Protection Systems (ENASP) which focuses on a broad spectrum of social security issues. Retirement pensions is one of its key areas of interest and thus the pension systems of these five countries provide an important benchmark for international comparison. In the Irish context, the findings suggest that Ireland lags in terms of its social security pension system, as it applies to farmers. Reform is needed to ensure full social welfare pension coverage for this cohort to protect their financial welfare in retirement and to support the farm succession process. We suggest some practical solutions in this regard.
农业部门的养老金规定——来自欧洲的教训
最近的养老金改革改善了欧盟内部个体经营者的养老金保障,但差距仍然存在,个体经营者在这方面仍然是弱势群体。总体而言,爱尔兰的自雇者的养老金水平低于在职者,自雇农民的养老金覆盖率最低,许多人根本不打算退休。尽管事实上,自雇农民主要比被雇佣者更早开始工作生活,就业时间更长。本研究的目的是评估五个国家的农民社会保障养老金制度的设计,这些国家为农民定制了社会保障养老金制度,以确定当前爱尔兰农民社会保障养老金制度中的差距,并强调国际上对农民定制制度的需求。研究的五个国家(奥地利、芬兰、法国、德国和波兰)是欧洲农业保护系统网络(ENASP)的成员,该网络侧重于广泛的社会安全问题。退休养恤金是其主要关注的领域之一,因此这五个国家的养恤金制度为国际比较提供了重要的基准。在爱尔兰的背景下,调查结果表明,爱尔兰在社会保障养老金制度方面落后,因为它适用于农民。需要进行改革,以确保这一群体的社会福利养老金全面覆盖,以保护他们退休后的经济福利,并支持农场继承过程。在这方面,我们提出了一些切实可行的解决办法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
9.80
自引率
9.80%
发文量
286
期刊介绍: The Journal of Rural Studies publishes research articles relating to such rural issues as society, demography, housing, employment, transport, services, land-use, recreation, agriculture and conservation. The focus is on those areas encompassing extensive land-use, with small-scale and diffuse settlement patterns and communities linked into the surrounding landscape and milieux. Particular emphasis will be given to aspects of planning policy and management. The journal is international and interdisciplinary in scope and content.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信