TWIN-MIX INJECTION REDUCES POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS AFTER LOWER THIRD MOLAR REMOVAL—A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW AND META-ANALYSIS OF RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIALS

IF 4.1 4区 医学 Q1 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE
ESZTER HARDI , ANNA TAKÁCS , BIANCA GOLZIO  NAVARRO  CAVALCANTE , BENCE SZABÓ , ANDREA HARNOS , PÉTER HEGYI , Gábor Varga , ORSOLYA NÉMETH , ÁRPÁD JOÓB-FANCSALY
{"title":"TWIN-MIX INJECTION REDUCES POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS AFTER LOWER THIRD MOLAR REMOVAL—A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW AND META-ANALYSIS OF RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIALS","authors":"ESZTER HARDI ,&nbsp;ANNA TAKÁCS ,&nbsp;BIANCA GOLZIO  NAVARRO  CAVALCANTE ,&nbsp;BENCE SZABÓ ,&nbsp;ANDREA HARNOS ,&nbsp;PÉTER HEGYI ,&nbsp;Gábor Varga ,&nbsp;ORSOLYA NÉMETH ,&nbsp;ÁRPÁD JOÓB-FANCSALY","doi":"10.1016/j.jebdp.2025.102098","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to assess whether pain, swelling and trismus following surgical removal of the lower third molar could be reduced by twin-mix injection.</div></div><div><h3>Materials and Methods</h3><div>MEDLINE, Embase and Cochrane Trials were searched for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) until 17th November 2022. Eight RCTs were included in the systematic review, and 7 in the meta-analysis. In this study, the twin-mix was compared with the conventional anesthetic solution. Outcomes were assessed on postoperative days 1, 3 and 7. Primary outcomes were swelling and trismus. Secondary outcomes were postoperative pain, pain score on local anesthetic injection, duration of soft tissue anesthesia, and latency of anesthesia. Risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane ROB2 tool. Certainty of evidence was evaluated with the GRADE tool.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>On postoperative day 1, the twin-mix group showed significant reductions in facial swelling (MD: −3.51 mm; [−5.04 to −1.97]), trismus (MD: −1.7 mm; [−2.48 to −0.92]) and pain (MD: −1.07; [−1.49 to −0.65]). On day 3, swelling (MD: −4.64 mm; [−6.34 to −2.94]), trismus (MD: −1.08 mm; [−1.55 to −0.61]) and pain (MD: −0.62; [−1.09 to −0.15]) remained significantly reduced. On day 7, differences persisted for swelling (MD: −0.58 mm; [−0.76 to −0.40]) and trismus (MD: −0.42 mm; [−0.72 to −0.12]), but no significant difference was found in pain (MD: −0.29; [−0.65 to 0.07]). The twin-mix also significantly reduced pain under local anesthesia, shortened latency and prolonged duration of anesthesia.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>In conclusion, the use of twin-mix is highly beneficial for pain relief, facial swelling and trismus following mandibular third molar surgical removal.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48736,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Evidence-Based Dental Practice","volume":"25 2","pages":"Article 102098"},"PeriodicalIF":4.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Evidence-Based Dental Practice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1532338225000132","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to assess whether pain, swelling and trismus following surgical removal of the lower third molar could be reduced by twin-mix injection.

Materials and Methods

MEDLINE, Embase and Cochrane Trials were searched for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) until 17th November 2022. Eight RCTs were included in the systematic review, and 7 in the meta-analysis. In this study, the twin-mix was compared with the conventional anesthetic solution. Outcomes were assessed on postoperative days 1, 3 and 7. Primary outcomes were swelling and trismus. Secondary outcomes were postoperative pain, pain score on local anesthetic injection, duration of soft tissue anesthesia, and latency of anesthesia. Risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane ROB2 tool. Certainty of evidence was evaluated with the GRADE tool.

Results

On postoperative day 1, the twin-mix group showed significant reductions in facial swelling (MD: −3.51 mm; [−5.04 to −1.97]), trismus (MD: −1.7 mm; [−2.48 to −0.92]) and pain (MD: −1.07; [−1.49 to −0.65]). On day 3, swelling (MD: −4.64 mm; [−6.34 to −2.94]), trismus (MD: −1.08 mm; [−1.55 to −0.61]) and pain (MD: −0.62; [−1.09 to −0.15]) remained significantly reduced. On day 7, differences persisted for swelling (MD: −0.58 mm; [−0.76 to −0.40]) and trismus (MD: −0.42 mm; [−0.72 to −0.12]), but no significant difference was found in pain (MD: −0.29; [−0.65 to 0.07]). The twin-mix also significantly reduced pain under local anesthesia, shortened latency and prolonged duration of anesthesia.

Conclusion

In conclusion, the use of twin-mix is highly beneficial for pain relief, facial swelling and trismus following mandibular third molar surgical removal.
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Evidence-Based Dental Practice
Journal of Evidence-Based Dental Practice DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE-
CiteScore
6.00
自引率
16.70%
发文量
105
审稿时长
28 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Evidence-Based Dental Practice presents timely original articles, as well as reviews of articles on the results and outcomes of clinical procedures and treatment. The Journal advocates the use or rejection of a procedure based on solid, clinical evidence found in literature. The Journal''s dynamic operating principles are explicitness in process and objectives, publication of the highest-quality reviews and original articles, and an emphasis on objectivity.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信