TWIN-MIX INJECTION REDUCES POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS AFTER LOWER THIRD MOLAR REMOVAL—A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW AND META-ANALYSIS OF RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIALS
ESZTER HARDI , ANNA TAKÁCS , BIANCA GOLZIO NAVARRO CAVALCANTE , BENCE SZABÓ , ANDREA HARNOS , PÉTER HEGYI , Gábor Varga , ORSOLYA NÉMETH , ÁRPÁD JOÓB-FANCSALY
{"title":"TWIN-MIX INJECTION REDUCES POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS AFTER LOWER THIRD MOLAR REMOVAL—A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW AND META-ANALYSIS OF RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIALS","authors":"ESZTER HARDI , ANNA TAKÁCS , BIANCA GOLZIO NAVARRO CAVALCANTE , BENCE SZABÓ , ANDREA HARNOS , PÉTER HEGYI , Gábor Varga , ORSOLYA NÉMETH , ÁRPÁD JOÓB-FANCSALY","doi":"10.1016/j.jebdp.2025.102098","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to assess whether pain, swelling and trismus following surgical removal of the lower third molar could be reduced by twin-mix injection.</div></div><div><h3>Materials and Methods</h3><div>MEDLINE, Embase and Cochrane Trials were searched for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) until 17th November 2022. Eight RCTs were included in the systematic review, and 7 in the meta-analysis. In this study, the twin-mix was compared with the conventional anesthetic solution. Outcomes were assessed on postoperative days 1, 3 and 7. Primary outcomes were swelling and trismus. Secondary outcomes were postoperative pain, pain score on local anesthetic injection, duration of soft tissue anesthesia, and latency of anesthesia. Risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane ROB2 tool. Certainty of evidence was evaluated with the GRADE tool.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>On postoperative day 1, the twin-mix group showed significant reductions in facial swelling (MD: −3.51 mm; [−5.04 to −1.97]), trismus (MD: −1.7 mm; [−2.48 to −0.92]) and pain (MD: −1.07; [−1.49 to −0.65]). On day 3, swelling (MD: −4.64 mm; [−6.34 to −2.94]), trismus (MD: −1.08 mm; [−1.55 to −0.61]) and pain (MD: −0.62; [−1.09 to −0.15]) remained significantly reduced. On day 7, differences persisted for swelling (MD: −0.58 mm; [−0.76 to −0.40]) and trismus (MD: −0.42 mm; [−0.72 to −0.12]), but no significant difference was found in pain (MD: −0.29; [−0.65 to 0.07]). The twin-mix also significantly reduced pain under local anesthesia, shortened latency and prolonged duration of anesthesia.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>In conclusion, the use of twin-mix is highly beneficial for pain relief, facial swelling and trismus following mandibular third molar surgical removal.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48736,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Evidence-Based Dental Practice","volume":"25 2","pages":"Article 102098"},"PeriodicalIF":4.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Evidence-Based Dental Practice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1532338225000132","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background
The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to assess whether pain, swelling and trismus following surgical removal of the lower third molar could be reduced by twin-mix injection.
Materials and Methods
MEDLINE, Embase and Cochrane Trials were searched for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) until 17th November 2022. Eight RCTs were included in the systematic review, and 7 in the meta-analysis. In this study, the twin-mix was compared with the conventional anesthetic solution. Outcomes were assessed on postoperative days 1, 3 and 7. Primary outcomes were swelling and trismus. Secondary outcomes were postoperative pain, pain score on local anesthetic injection, duration of soft tissue anesthesia, and latency of anesthesia. Risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane ROB2 tool. Certainty of evidence was evaluated with the GRADE tool.
Results
On postoperative day 1, the twin-mix group showed significant reductions in facial swelling (MD: −3.51 mm; [−5.04 to −1.97]), trismus (MD: −1.7 mm; [−2.48 to −0.92]) and pain (MD: −1.07; [−1.49 to −0.65]). On day 3, swelling (MD: −4.64 mm; [−6.34 to −2.94]), trismus (MD: −1.08 mm; [−1.55 to −0.61]) and pain (MD: −0.62; [−1.09 to −0.15]) remained significantly reduced. On day 7, differences persisted for swelling (MD: −0.58 mm; [−0.76 to −0.40]) and trismus (MD: −0.42 mm; [−0.72 to −0.12]), but no significant difference was found in pain (MD: −0.29; [−0.65 to 0.07]). The twin-mix also significantly reduced pain under local anesthesia, shortened latency and prolonged duration of anesthesia.
Conclusion
In conclusion, the use of twin-mix is highly beneficial for pain relief, facial swelling and trismus following mandibular third molar surgical removal.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Evidence-Based Dental Practice presents timely original articles, as well as reviews of articles on the results and outcomes of clinical procedures and treatment. The Journal advocates the use or rejection of a procedure based on solid, clinical evidence found in literature. The Journal''s dynamic operating principles are explicitness in process and objectives, publication of the highest-quality reviews and original articles, and an emphasis on objectivity.