Sebastião de Campos Valadares Filho, Antonio de Sousa Brito Neto, Felipe Henrique de Moura, Douglas Teixeira Saraiva, Nathália Veloso Trópia, Samira Silveira Moreira, Dhones Rodrigues de Andrade, Pauliane Pucetti
{"title":"Models for predicting NDFap and iNDF in tropical conditions","authors":"Sebastião de Campos Valadares Filho, Antonio de Sousa Brito Neto, Felipe Henrique de Moura, Douglas Teixeira Saraiva, Nathália Veloso Trópia, Samira Silveira Moreira, Dhones Rodrigues de Andrade, Pauliane Pucetti","doi":"10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2025.116271","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Our objective was to develop and evaluate equations for estimating neutral detergent fiber corrected for ash and protein residue (NDF<sub>ap</sub>) and indigestible neutral detergent fiber (<sub>i</sub>NDF). All feeds data were obtained from information cataloged in the Brazilian Tables of Feed Composition for Cattle (CQBAL 4.0). In addition, information from ruminal digesta, omasal digesta and feces derived from 14 studies was used, which included the chemical characteristics studied in this approach. Eight subsets of data were constructed to predict: NDF<sub>ap</sub> of roughages, concentrates, ruminal digesta, omasal digesta, and feces; <sub>i</sub>NDF of roughages, concentrates and feces. Within each data subset, 80 % of the information was used for model development and 20 % for model evaluation. To predict the NDF<sub>ap</sub> the existence of a linear relationship between the NDF<sub>ap</sub> and NDF contents was assumed, and simple linear regression equations were fitted. A Pearson correlation analysis and Stepwise selection process was performed between <sub>i</sub>NDF and the potential predictor variables. The evaluation of the equations was carried out using the Model Evaluation System Software. The subset data represented a wide variation in NDF<sub>ap</sub> content of roughage (237.9–777 g/kg), concentrates (27.2–600 g/kg), rumen digesta (341.7–673.9 g/kg), omasal digesta (19.1–662.6 g/kg) and feces (243.1–721.8 g/kg); and in the <sub>i</sub>NDF content of roughage (80–394.7 g/kg), concentrates (2.4–370 g/kg) and feces (72.7–624.6 g/kg). The linear relationships between the observed and predicted values of NDF<sub>ap</sub> for roughages, concentrates, ruminal digesta, omasal digesta and feces presented an intercept not different from zero (P ≥ 0.19) and a slope not different from one (P ≥ 0.13), and high values of R<sup>2</sup> and CCC. All equations generated to predict roughage <sub>i</sub>NDF were suitable, presenting P ≥ 0.08 for intercept equal to zero and/or slope equal to one in the plot of the relationship between observed and predicted values. For <sub>i</sub>NDF of concentrates and feces, the power function was the only equation that showed good predictive performance (P ≥ 0.21 for intercept and slope). The models developed in this study will provide support in estimating the energy value of feeds, especially in conditions where direct assessments are limited.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":7861,"journal":{"name":"Animal Feed Science and Technology","volume":"322 ","pages":"Article 116271"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Animal Feed Science and Technology","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0377840125000665","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRICULTURE, DAIRY & ANIMAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Our objective was to develop and evaluate equations for estimating neutral detergent fiber corrected for ash and protein residue (NDFap) and indigestible neutral detergent fiber (iNDF). All feeds data were obtained from information cataloged in the Brazilian Tables of Feed Composition for Cattle (CQBAL 4.0). In addition, information from ruminal digesta, omasal digesta and feces derived from 14 studies was used, which included the chemical characteristics studied in this approach. Eight subsets of data were constructed to predict: NDFap of roughages, concentrates, ruminal digesta, omasal digesta, and feces; iNDF of roughages, concentrates and feces. Within each data subset, 80 % of the information was used for model development and 20 % for model evaluation. To predict the NDFap the existence of a linear relationship between the NDFap and NDF contents was assumed, and simple linear regression equations were fitted. A Pearson correlation analysis and Stepwise selection process was performed between iNDF and the potential predictor variables. The evaluation of the equations was carried out using the Model Evaluation System Software. The subset data represented a wide variation in NDFap content of roughage (237.9–777 g/kg), concentrates (27.2–600 g/kg), rumen digesta (341.7–673.9 g/kg), omasal digesta (19.1–662.6 g/kg) and feces (243.1–721.8 g/kg); and in the iNDF content of roughage (80–394.7 g/kg), concentrates (2.4–370 g/kg) and feces (72.7–624.6 g/kg). The linear relationships between the observed and predicted values of NDFap for roughages, concentrates, ruminal digesta, omasal digesta and feces presented an intercept not different from zero (P ≥ 0.19) and a slope not different from one (P ≥ 0.13), and high values of R2 and CCC. All equations generated to predict roughage iNDF were suitable, presenting P ≥ 0.08 for intercept equal to zero and/or slope equal to one in the plot of the relationship between observed and predicted values. For iNDF of concentrates and feces, the power function was the only equation that showed good predictive performance (P ≥ 0.21 for intercept and slope). The models developed in this study will provide support in estimating the energy value of feeds, especially in conditions where direct assessments are limited.
期刊介绍:
Animal Feed Science and Technology is a unique journal publishing scientific papers of international interest focusing on animal feeds and their feeding.
Papers describing research on feed for ruminants and non-ruminants, including poultry, horses, companion animals and aquatic animals, are welcome.
The journal covers the following areas:
Nutritive value of feeds (e.g., assessment, improvement)
Methods of conserving and processing feeds that affect their nutritional value
Agronomic and climatic factors influencing the nutritive value of feeds
Utilization of feeds and the improvement of such
Metabolic, production, reproduction and health responses, as well as potential environmental impacts, of diet inputs and feed technologies (e.g., feeds, feed additives, feed components, mycotoxins)
Mathematical models relating directly to animal-feed interactions
Analytical and experimental methods for feed evaluation
Environmental impacts of feed technologies in animal production.