Involvement of episodic memory in language comprehension: Naturalistic comprehension pushes unrelated words closer in semantic space for at least 12 h

IF 2.8 1区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL
Matthew H.C. Mak , Lewis V. Ball , Alice O'Hagan , Catherine R. Walsh , M. Gareth Gaskell
{"title":"Involvement of episodic memory in language comprehension: Naturalistic comprehension pushes unrelated words closer in semantic space for at least 12 h","authors":"Matthew H.C. Mak ,&nbsp;Lewis V. Ball ,&nbsp;Alice O'Hagan ,&nbsp;Catherine R. Walsh ,&nbsp;M. Gareth Gaskell","doi":"10.1016/j.cognition.2025.106086","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Recent experience with a word significantly influences its subsequent interpretation. For instance, encountering <em>bank</em> in a river-related context biases future interpretations toward ‘side of a river’ (vs. ‘financial bank’). To explain this effect, the <em>episodic context</em> account posits that episodic memory helps bind word meanings in the language input, creating a temporary, context-specific representation that can bias subsequent lexical interpretation. This account predicts that even <em>unrelated</em> words would be linked together in episodic memory, potentially altering their interpretation. In Experiments 1–3, participants read unrelated word pairs (e.g., <em>sword—microwave</em>, <em>privacy—export</em>) embedded in meaningful sentences, then completed a speeded relatedness judgement task after delays of 5 min, 20 min, or 12 h (including sleep). Results showed that sentence exposure increased the likelihood of the unrelated pairs being judged as related—a robust effect observed across all delay intervals. Experiment 4 showed that this exposure effect was abolished when words in a target pair were read in separate sentences, suggesting that the exposure effect may be dependent on lexical co-occurrence. Experiment 5, also with a 12-h delay (including sleep), additionally used an innovative word arrangement task to assess word relatedness without presenting the target pairs simultaneously or successively. In line with relatedness judgement, sentence exposure pushed the unrelated words closer in semantic space. Overall, our findings suggest that a context-specific representation, supported by episodic memory, is generated during language comprehension, and in turn, these representations can influence lexical interpretation for at least 12 h and across different linguistic circumstances. We argue that these representations endow the mental lexicon with the efficiency to deal with word burstiness and the dynamic nature of language.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48455,"journal":{"name":"Cognition","volume":"258 ","pages":"Article 106086"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cognition","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0010027725000265","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Recent experience with a word significantly influences its subsequent interpretation. For instance, encountering bank in a river-related context biases future interpretations toward ‘side of a river’ (vs. ‘financial bank’). To explain this effect, the episodic context account posits that episodic memory helps bind word meanings in the language input, creating a temporary, context-specific representation that can bias subsequent lexical interpretation. This account predicts that even unrelated words would be linked together in episodic memory, potentially altering their interpretation. In Experiments 1–3, participants read unrelated word pairs (e.g., sword—microwave, privacy—export) embedded in meaningful sentences, then completed a speeded relatedness judgement task after delays of 5 min, 20 min, or 12 h (including sleep). Results showed that sentence exposure increased the likelihood of the unrelated pairs being judged as related—a robust effect observed across all delay intervals. Experiment 4 showed that this exposure effect was abolished when words in a target pair were read in separate sentences, suggesting that the exposure effect may be dependent on lexical co-occurrence. Experiment 5, also with a 12-h delay (including sleep), additionally used an innovative word arrangement task to assess word relatedness without presenting the target pairs simultaneously or successively. In line with relatedness judgement, sentence exposure pushed the unrelated words closer in semantic space. Overall, our findings suggest that a context-specific representation, supported by episodic memory, is generated during language comprehension, and in turn, these representations can influence lexical interpretation for at least 12 h and across different linguistic circumstances. We argue that these representations endow the mental lexicon with the efficiency to deal with word burstiness and the dynamic nature of language.
情景记忆在语言理解中的参与:自然理解将不相关的词在语义空间中推得更近至少12小时
最近使用一个词的经历会显著影响其随后的解释。例如,在与河流相关的语境中遇到银行,会使未来的解释偏向于“河的一边”(而不是“金融银行”)。为了解释这一效应,情景语境解释假设情景记忆有助于将语言输入中的单词含义联系起来,创造一种临时的、特定于情境的表征,这种表征可能会影响随后的词汇解释。这种说法预测,即使是不相关的单词也会在情景记忆中联系在一起,可能会改变它们的解释。在实验1-3中,参与者阅读嵌入在有意义的句子中的不相关单词对(如剑-微波,隐私-出口),然后在延迟5分钟,20分钟或12小时(包括睡眠)后完成快速相关性判断任务。结果表明,句子暴露增加了不相关对被判断为相关的可能性——在所有延迟间隔中都观察到一个强有力的效应。实验4表明,在单独的句子中阅读目标对中的单词时,这种暴露效应被消除,这表明暴露效应可能依赖于词汇共现。实验5,同样是延迟12小时(包括睡眠),在不同时或连续呈现目标对的情况下,使用创新的单词排列任务来评估单词相关性。根据相关性判断,句子暴露使语义空间中不相关的词更接近。总的来说,我们的研究结果表明,在语言理解过程中产生了一个由情景记忆支持的情境特定表征,反过来,这些表征可以影响词汇解释至少12小时,并跨越不同的语言环境。我们认为,这些表征赋予了心理词汇处理突发性和语言动态性的效率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Cognition
Cognition PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL-
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
5.90%
发文量
283
期刊介绍: Cognition is an international journal that publishes theoretical and experimental papers on the study of the mind. It covers a wide variety of subjects concerning all the different aspects of cognition, ranging from biological and experimental studies to formal analysis. Contributions from the fields of psychology, neuroscience, linguistics, computer science, mathematics, ethology and philosophy are welcome in this journal provided that they have some bearing on the functioning of the mind. In addition, the journal serves as a forum for discussion of social and political aspects of cognitive science.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信