Dismantle structural barriers to improve reproductive healthcare for racially minoritised women

The BMJ Pub Date : 2025-02-20 DOI:10.1136/bmj.r277
Danielle Solomon
{"title":"Dismantle structural barriers to improve reproductive healthcare for racially minoritised women","authors":"Danielle Solomon","doi":"10.1136/bmj.r277","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Reproductive justice requires an intersectional approach, says Danielle Solomon Over the past decade inequities in reproductive outcomes among racially minoritised women have increasingly become a part of public health discourse. This is largely because of widespread advocacy efforts led by organisations such as Five x More1 and the Reproductive Justice Initiative.2 It is an area that was the subject of a feature in the 2020 BMJ Racism in Medicine series,3 and it is just as relevant in this series, five years later. If we are to tackle these inequities, it is crucial that decision makers understand the complex, structural drivers of reproductive health inequality. One of the key statistics—often at the forefront of this discourse—is the disparity in maternal mortality between black and white women. In the UK, women of black ethnicity are twice as likely to die during pregnancy and the neonatal period as white women, and the maternal mortality risk among Asian women is also higher than in white women.4 This is just the tip of the iceberg—racial inequity stretches across the entirety of reproductive health. Risk of miscarriage is …","PeriodicalId":22388,"journal":{"name":"The BMJ","volume":"19 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The BMJ","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.r277","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Reproductive justice requires an intersectional approach, says Danielle Solomon Over the past decade inequities in reproductive outcomes among racially minoritised women have increasingly become a part of public health discourse. This is largely because of widespread advocacy efforts led by organisations such as Five x More1 and the Reproductive Justice Initiative.2 It is an area that was the subject of a feature in the 2020 BMJ Racism in Medicine series,3 and it is just as relevant in this series, five years later. If we are to tackle these inequities, it is crucial that decision makers understand the complex, structural drivers of reproductive health inequality. One of the key statistics—often at the forefront of this discourse—is the disparity in maternal mortality between black and white women. In the UK, women of black ethnicity are twice as likely to die during pregnancy and the neonatal period as white women, and the maternal mortality risk among Asian women is also higher than in white women.4 This is just the tip of the iceberg—racial inequity stretches across the entirety of reproductive health. Risk of miscarriage is …
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信