Characterizing diagnostic disclosure communication strategies and challenges in dementia care: A qualitative study of interprofessional clinicians across three systems.

Joanna Paladino, Heily Chavez Granados, Alissa Bernstein Sideman, Carine Davila, Liliana Ramirez Gomez, Elizabeth Lindenberger, Susan Block, Ana-Maria Vranceanu, Deborah Blacker, Dorene Rentz, Christine Ritchie
{"title":"Characterizing diagnostic disclosure communication strategies and challenges in dementia care: A qualitative study of interprofessional clinicians across three systems.","authors":"Joanna Paladino, Heily Chavez Granados, Alissa Bernstein Sideman, Carine Davila, Liliana Ramirez Gomez, Elizabeth Lindenberger, Susan Block, Ana-Maria Vranceanu, Deborah Blacker, Dorene Rentz, Christine Ritchie","doi":"10.1177/14713012251321569","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background:</b> Diagnostic disclosure communication in dementia care proves challenging for clinicians and inadequately addresses patient and caregiver needs. We characterized clinician communication strategies and challenges for diagnostic disclosure conversations as an initial step in developing a structured communication intervention. <b>Methods:</b> Thematic analysis of semi-structured interviews with 23 clinicians across three academic medical centers in neurology, geriatrics, geriatric psychiatry, neuropsychology, and primary care. <b>Findings:</b> Communicating a dementia diagnosis, because of its gravity, requires incremental communication strategies organized in the following domains. First, building and maintaining strong relationships with patients and caregivers by establishing rapport and emotional connection builds trust and creates a sense of partnership. Second, assessing illness awareness and establishing readiness to discuss diagnosis occurs over multiple visits. This involves creating psychological safety to discuss cognitive concerns, especially for individuals from racial and ethnic marginalized communities in which there is enhanced stigma. Third, clinicians tailor word choice for disclosure based on patient and caregiver needs and their own comfort. Fourth, clinicians are attuned to patient and caregiver emotions but feel varying levels of comfort responding to emotions. Fifth, approaches to sharing prognostic information include emphasis on individual variability and discussions of longer-term anticipated changes to function, although clinicians identified challenges with discussing prognosis due to uncertainty about rates of progression. Sixth, supporting hope and preparation in care planning supports patients and caregivers to adapt to the diagnosis and plan for future changes. Building relationships with caregivers and adapting communication for patients of different cultural backgrounds occurs throughout the process. Common challenges include: harm to the therapeutic relationship from 'abrupt' disclosures; limitations in patient ability to retain or accept diagnostic information; clinicians' challenges with their own emotions that arise with disclosure. <b>Conclusion:</b> A customized, structured communication framework and training for clinicians may enhance the quality of diagnostic disclosure conversations in dementia care.</p>","PeriodicalId":72778,"journal":{"name":"Dementia (London, England)","volume":" ","pages":"14713012251321569"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Dementia (London, England)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/14713012251321569","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Diagnostic disclosure communication in dementia care proves challenging for clinicians and inadequately addresses patient and caregiver needs. We characterized clinician communication strategies and challenges for diagnostic disclosure conversations as an initial step in developing a structured communication intervention. Methods: Thematic analysis of semi-structured interviews with 23 clinicians across three academic medical centers in neurology, geriatrics, geriatric psychiatry, neuropsychology, and primary care. Findings: Communicating a dementia diagnosis, because of its gravity, requires incremental communication strategies organized in the following domains. First, building and maintaining strong relationships with patients and caregivers by establishing rapport and emotional connection builds trust and creates a sense of partnership. Second, assessing illness awareness and establishing readiness to discuss diagnosis occurs over multiple visits. This involves creating psychological safety to discuss cognitive concerns, especially for individuals from racial and ethnic marginalized communities in which there is enhanced stigma. Third, clinicians tailor word choice for disclosure based on patient and caregiver needs and their own comfort. Fourth, clinicians are attuned to patient and caregiver emotions but feel varying levels of comfort responding to emotions. Fifth, approaches to sharing prognostic information include emphasis on individual variability and discussions of longer-term anticipated changes to function, although clinicians identified challenges with discussing prognosis due to uncertainty about rates of progression. Sixth, supporting hope and preparation in care planning supports patients and caregivers to adapt to the diagnosis and plan for future changes. Building relationships with caregivers and adapting communication for patients of different cultural backgrounds occurs throughout the process. Common challenges include: harm to the therapeutic relationship from 'abrupt' disclosures; limitations in patient ability to retain or accept diagnostic information; clinicians' challenges with their own emotions that arise with disclosure. Conclusion: A customized, structured communication framework and training for clinicians may enhance the quality of diagnostic disclosure conversations in dementia care.

背景:痴呆症护理中的诊断披露沟通对临床医生来说极具挑战性,而且不能充分满足患者和护理者的需求。作为开发结构化沟通干预的第一步,我们描述了临床医生在诊断披露对话中的沟通策略和挑战。方法对三个学术医疗中心的神经病学、老年病学、老年精神病学、神经心理学和初级保健领域的 23 名临床医生进行了半结构化访谈的主题分析。研究结果由于痴呆症诊断的严重性,沟通痴呆症诊断需要在以下领域采取渐进式沟通策略。首先,通过建立融洽的关系和情感联系,与患者和护理人员建立并保持稳固的关系,从而建立信任并产生合作意识。其次,通过多次就诊来评估对疾病的认识,并为讨论诊断做好准备。这涉及到为讨论认知问题创造心理安全,尤其是对于来自种族和民族边缘化社区的个人,因为在这些社区中存在更多的耻辱感。第三,临床医生要根据患者和护理人员的需求以及自身的舒适度来选择披露的词语。第四,临床医生关注患者和护理人员的情绪,但对情绪反应的舒适程度各不相同。第五,分享预后信息的方法包括强调个体差异和讨论功能的长期预期变化,但临床医生发现,由于进展速度的不确定性,讨论预后存在挑战。第六,在护理规划中支持希望和准备,帮助患者和护理者适应诊断并为未来的变化做好计划。在整个过程中,需要与护理人员建立关系,并针对不同文化背景的患者调整沟通方式。常见的挑战包括:"突然 "披露对治疗关系的伤害;患者保留或接受诊断信息能力的限制;临床医生因披露信息而产生的自身情绪挑战。结论为临床医生量身定制的结构化沟通框架和培训可提高痴呆症护理中诊断信息披露对话的质量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信