Visual vertigo is not correlated with perception of dynamic verticality.

IF 1.6 4区 医学 Q2 AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY
Tzu-Pu Chang, Ying-Chi Hong, Yu-Hung Kuo, Michael C Schubert
{"title":"Visual vertigo is not correlated with perception of dynamic verticality.","authors":"Tzu-Pu Chang, Ying-Chi Hong, Yu-Hung Kuo, Michael C Schubert","doi":"10.1159/000543868","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>We conducted a prospective study determining the relationship between severity of visual vertigo and extent of visual dependence by comparing the visual vertigo analogue scale (VVAS) with the dynamic subjective visual vertical (dSVV) test.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Seventy-six patients with chronic dizziness (without peripheral or central vestibular lesions) and 43 healthy controls completed VVAS and dSVV testing. The VVAS uses nine visual analogue scales to query visual vertigo across nine specific situations. The dSVV measures visual dependence under three conditions: static background, counterclockwise (CCW) rotating background, and clockwise (CW) rotating background (20 o/s). Finally, each patient completed a simulator sickness questionnaire (SSQ) to evaluate the dizziness induced from the dSVV. VVAS, dSVV, and SSQ were compared between the patient and the control groups. Among the patient group, the correlation between VVAS and dynamic SVV were determined. Associations of outcomes measures and gender, age, and migraine were also assessed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Patients with dizziness had significantly greater VVAS (16.9 VS 1.6, p < 0.001) and SSQ (25.7 VS 6.5, p < 0.001) scores, yet less deviation of dSVV (CCW background: -9.2 VS -11.5, p = 0.05; CW background: 7.4 VS 10.1, p = 0.02) than controls. In the patient group, VVAS was not correlated with dynamic SVV for either CCW (r = 0.12, p = 0.30) or CW backgrounds (r = -0.01, p = 0.92). During CCW rotation the SVV deviation was greater in older-aged patients and slightly greater in female. During CW rotation the SVV deviation was less in the patients with migraine.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In chronic dizzy patients that have no measurable peripheral or central vestibular lesion, severity of visual vertigo is not correlated with visual dependence.</p>","PeriodicalId":55432,"journal":{"name":"Audiology and Neuro-Otology","volume":" ","pages":"1-14"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Audiology and Neuro-Otology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000543868","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: We conducted a prospective study determining the relationship between severity of visual vertigo and extent of visual dependence by comparing the visual vertigo analogue scale (VVAS) with the dynamic subjective visual vertical (dSVV) test.

Methods: Seventy-six patients with chronic dizziness (without peripheral or central vestibular lesions) and 43 healthy controls completed VVAS and dSVV testing. The VVAS uses nine visual analogue scales to query visual vertigo across nine specific situations. The dSVV measures visual dependence under three conditions: static background, counterclockwise (CCW) rotating background, and clockwise (CW) rotating background (20 o/s). Finally, each patient completed a simulator sickness questionnaire (SSQ) to evaluate the dizziness induced from the dSVV. VVAS, dSVV, and SSQ were compared between the patient and the control groups. Among the patient group, the correlation between VVAS and dynamic SVV were determined. Associations of outcomes measures and gender, age, and migraine were also assessed.

Results: Patients with dizziness had significantly greater VVAS (16.9 VS 1.6, p < 0.001) and SSQ (25.7 VS 6.5, p < 0.001) scores, yet less deviation of dSVV (CCW background: -9.2 VS -11.5, p = 0.05; CW background: 7.4 VS 10.1, p = 0.02) than controls. In the patient group, VVAS was not correlated with dynamic SVV for either CCW (r = 0.12, p = 0.30) or CW backgrounds (r = -0.01, p = 0.92). During CCW rotation the SVV deviation was greater in older-aged patients and slightly greater in female. During CW rotation the SVV deviation was less in the patients with migraine.

Conclusion: In chronic dizzy patients that have no measurable peripheral or central vestibular lesion, severity of visual vertigo is not correlated with visual dependence.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Audiology and Neuro-Otology
Audiology and Neuro-Otology 医学-耳鼻喉科学
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
6.20%
发文量
35
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: ''Audiology and Neurotology'' provides a forum for the publication of the most-advanced and rigorous scientific research related to the basic science and clinical aspects of the auditory and vestibular system and diseases of the ear. This journal seeks submission of cutting edge research opening up new and innovative fields of study that may improve our understanding and treatment of patients with disorders of the auditory and vestibular systems, their central connections and their perception in the central nervous system. In addition to original papers the journal also offers invited review articles on current topics written by leading experts in the field. The journal is of primary importance for all scientists and practitioners interested in audiology, otology and neurotology, auditory neurosciences and related disciplines.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信