Nasal pathobiont abundance does not differ between dairy cattle with or without clinical symptoms of bovine respiratory disease.

IF 4.9 Q1 MICROBIOLOGY
Ruth Eunice Centeno-Delphia, Erica A Long, Audrey C Ellis, Sarah Hofmann, Kara Mosier, Noelmi Ulloa, Johnnie Junior Cheng, Andrew Richards, Jacquelyn P Boerman, Jennifer Koziol, Mohit S Verma, Timothy A Johnson
{"title":"Nasal pathobiont abundance does not differ between dairy cattle with or without clinical symptoms of bovine respiratory disease.","authors":"Ruth Eunice Centeno-Delphia, Erica A Long, Audrey C Ellis, Sarah Hofmann, Kara Mosier, Noelmi Ulloa, Johnnie Junior Cheng, Andrew Richards, Jacquelyn P Boerman, Jennifer Koziol, Mohit S Verma, Timothy A Johnson","doi":"10.1186/s42523-025-00382-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Bovine respiratory disease (BRD) remains a significant health and economic problem to the dairy cattle industry. Multiple risk factors contribute to BRD susceptibility including the bacterial pathobionts Mannheimia haemolytica, Pasteurella multocida, Histophilus somni, and Mycoplasma bovis. Studies have characterized and quantified the abundance of these bacteria in the nasal cavity of cattle to infer and help disease diagnosis; nonetheless, there is still discrepancy in the results observed of when these microbes are commensal or pathogenic. Additionally, some of these studies are limited to a specific farm. The goal of this study is to compare the nasal microbiome community (diversity and composition) and the abundance of the four bacterial pathogens (by qPCR) in the nasal cavity to identify differences between dairy calves that are apparently healthy and those identified to have BRD. Nasal swabs were collected from approximately 50 apparently healthy and 50 BRD-affected calves sampled from five different dairy farms in the US (CA, IN, NY (two farms), and TX).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Calves diagnosed with BRD in NY, and TX had lower nasal microbiome diversity compared to the apparently healthy calves. Differences in the nasal microbiome composition were observed between the different farms predicted by Bray-Curtis and weighted UniFrac dissimilarities. Commensal and pathobiont genera Acinetobacter, Moraxella, Psychrobacter, Histophilus, Mannheimia, Mycoplasma, and Pasteurella were prevalent in the bovine nasal microbiome regardless of farm or disease status. The BRD-pathobiont H. somni was the most prevalent pathobiont among all the samples and M. bovis the least prevalent. Only in CA was the abundance of a pathobiont different according to disease status, where M. haemolytica was significantly more abundant in the BRD-affected animals than apparently healthy animals.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study offers insight into the nasal microbiome community composition in both animals diagnosed with BRD and healthy animals, and shows that the farm effect plays a more significant role in determining the microbiome community than disease status in young dairy calves.</p>","PeriodicalId":72201,"journal":{"name":"Animal microbiome","volume":"7 1","pages":"16"},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11837595/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Animal microbiome","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s42523-025-00382-3","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MICROBIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Bovine respiratory disease (BRD) remains a significant health and economic problem to the dairy cattle industry. Multiple risk factors contribute to BRD susceptibility including the bacterial pathobionts Mannheimia haemolytica, Pasteurella multocida, Histophilus somni, and Mycoplasma bovis. Studies have characterized and quantified the abundance of these bacteria in the nasal cavity of cattle to infer and help disease diagnosis; nonetheless, there is still discrepancy in the results observed of when these microbes are commensal or pathogenic. Additionally, some of these studies are limited to a specific farm. The goal of this study is to compare the nasal microbiome community (diversity and composition) and the abundance of the four bacterial pathogens (by qPCR) in the nasal cavity to identify differences between dairy calves that are apparently healthy and those identified to have BRD. Nasal swabs were collected from approximately 50 apparently healthy and 50 BRD-affected calves sampled from five different dairy farms in the US (CA, IN, NY (two farms), and TX).

Results: Calves diagnosed with BRD in NY, and TX had lower nasal microbiome diversity compared to the apparently healthy calves. Differences in the nasal microbiome composition were observed between the different farms predicted by Bray-Curtis and weighted UniFrac dissimilarities. Commensal and pathobiont genera Acinetobacter, Moraxella, Psychrobacter, Histophilus, Mannheimia, Mycoplasma, and Pasteurella were prevalent in the bovine nasal microbiome regardless of farm or disease status. The BRD-pathobiont H. somni was the most prevalent pathobiont among all the samples and M. bovis the least prevalent. Only in CA was the abundance of a pathobiont different according to disease status, where M. haemolytica was significantly more abundant in the BRD-affected animals than apparently healthy animals.

Conclusions: This study offers insight into the nasal microbiome community composition in both animals diagnosed with BRD and healthy animals, and shows that the farm effect plays a more significant role in determining the microbiome community than disease status in young dairy calves.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
13 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信