Is differential cleaning needed for SARS-CoV-2 beyond standard procedures? A systematic review.

IF 0.6 Q4 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Journal of Public Health in Africa Pub Date : 2025-01-17 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.4102/jphia.v16i2.601
Uduak Okomo, Ememobong N Aquaisua, Osamagbe Asemota, Deborah Ndukwu, Josephine E Egbung, Ekpereonne B Esu, Olabisi A Oduwole, John E Ehiri
{"title":"Is differential cleaning needed for SARS-CoV-2 beyond standard procedures? A systematic review.","authors":"Uduak Okomo, Ememobong N Aquaisua, Osamagbe Asemota, Deborah Ndukwu, Josephine E Egbung, Ekpereonne B Esu, Olabisi A Oduwole, John E Ehiri","doi":"10.4102/jphia.v16i2.601","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>There is a substantial risk of indirect transmission of SARS-CoV-2 from contaminated surfaces and objects in healthcare settings.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To evaluate the effectiveness of enhanced cleaning protocols for high-touch surfaces during COVID-19, focusing on cleaning products, concentrations, contact time, and recommended frequency.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>We focused on research conducted in healthcare settings or where samples were obtained from healthcare environments.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>We assessed studies that compared different cleaning, disinfection, sterilisation, or decontamination procedures and cleaning frequency with standard or routine procedures. We prioritised randomised trials, non-randomised controlled trials, controlled before-and-after studies, and interrupted time series analyses carried out between 01 January 2020 and 31 August 2022.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Three studies met our criteria from 2139 references searched. These studies, which took place in Iran, China and the United States, found that routine terminal cleaning and enhanced terminal cleaning with different cleaning enhancements significantly reduced SARS-CoV-2 surface contamination. One of the studies tested residual SARS-CoV-2 levels after routine and terminal cleaning with varying strengths of disinfectant and evaluated the efficacy of two common types of disinfectants in inactivating SARS-CoV-2 on inanimate surfaces in different hospital wards.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Limited evidence supports cleaning strategies that can reduce the transmission of SARS-CoV-2 from surfaces in healthcare settings. Combining various cleaning methods and using multiple disinfectants can effectively reduce surface contamination.</p><p><strong>Contribution: </strong>Randomised controlled trials are crucial for evaluating cleaning effectiveness. They must outline cleaning protocols, detailing frequency, product concentration and volume, application methods, soil and surface types, and environmental conditions, to provide strong evidence.</p>","PeriodicalId":44723,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Public Health in Africa","volume":"16 2","pages":"601"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11830871/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Public Health in Africa","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4102/jphia.v16i2.601","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: There is a substantial risk of indirect transmission of SARS-CoV-2 from contaminated surfaces and objects in healthcare settings.

Aim: To evaluate the effectiveness of enhanced cleaning protocols for high-touch surfaces during COVID-19, focusing on cleaning products, concentrations, contact time, and recommended frequency.

Setting: We focused on research conducted in healthcare settings or where samples were obtained from healthcare environments.

Method: We assessed studies that compared different cleaning, disinfection, sterilisation, or decontamination procedures and cleaning frequency with standard or routine procedures. We prioritised randomised trials, non-randomised controlled trials, controlled before-and-after studies, and interrupted time series analyses carried out between 01 January 2020 and 31 August 2022.

Results: Three studies met our criteria from 2139 references searched. These studies, which took place in Iran, China and the United States, found that routine terminal cleaning and enhanced terminal cleaning with different cleaning enhancements significantly reduced SARS-CoV-2 surface contamination. One of the studies tested residual SARS-CoV-2 levels after routine and terminal cleaning with varying strengths of disinfectant and evaluated the efficacy of two common types of disinfectants in inactivating SARS-CoV-2 on inanimate surfaces in different hospital wards.

Conclusion: Limited evidence supports cleaning strategies that can reduce the transmission of SARS-CoV-2 from surfaces in healthcare settings. Combining various cleaning methods and using multiple disinfectants can effectively reduce surface contamination.

Contribution: Randomised controlled trials are crucial for evaluating cleaning effectiveness. They must outline cleaning protocols, detailing frequency, product concentration and volume, application methods, soil and surface types, and environmental conditions, to provide strong evidence.

SARS-CoV-2是否需要超出标准程序的差异清洁?系统回顾。
背景:在卫生保健环境中,存在SARS-CoV-2从被污染的表面和物体间接传播的重大风险。目的:评估COVID-19期间高接触表面强化清洁方案的有效性,重点关注清洁产品、浓度、接触时间和建议频率。环境:我们关注在医疗环境中进行的研究或从医疗环境中获得样本的研究。方法:我们评估了比较不同清洁、消毒、灭菌或去污程序和清洁频率与标准或常规程序的研究。我们优先考虑了在2020年1月1日至2022年8月31日期间进行的随机试验、非随机对照试验、对照前后研究和中断时间序列分析。结果:检索到的2139篇文献中有3篇研究符合我们的标准。这些在伊朗、中国和美国进行的研究发现,常规终端清洁和采用不同清洁方式的增强终端清洁可显著减少SARS-CoV-2表面污染。其中一项研究测试了使用不同强度的消毒剂进行常规清洁和终末清洁后残留的SARS-CoV-2水平,并评估了两种常见消毒剂在不同医院病房无生命表面灭活SARS-CoV-2的效果。结论:有限的证据支持清洁策略可以减少医疗机构表面SARS-CoV-2的传播。结合多种清洁方法,使用多种消毒剂,可有效减少表面污染。贡献:随机对照试验对评估清洁效果至关重要。他们必须概述清洁方案,详细说明频率,产品浓度和体积,应用方法,土壤和表面类型以及环境条件,以提供有力的证据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Public Health in Africa
Journal of Public Health in Africa PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
82
审稿时长
10 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Public Health in Africa (JPHiA) is a peer-reviewed, academic journal that focuses on health issues in the African continent. The journal editors seek high quality original articles on public health related issues, reviews, comments and more. The aim of the journal is to move public health discourse from the background to the forefront. The success of Africa’s struggle against disease depends on public health approaches.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信