{"title":"[Risk factors for adverse prognosis in acute aortic syndrome: a single-center retrospective cohort study].","authors":"Z C Gao, Y Wang, G S Li, C Yin, D H Qian, J Jin","doi":"10.3760/cma.j.cn112148-20240903-00507","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Objective:</b> To explore the prognosis of patients with acute aortic syndrome (AAS) in the real world and to examine the risk factors associated with poor outcomes in AAS. <b>Methods:</b> This is a single-center retrospective study. Patients diagnosed with AAS at Xinqiao Hospital from January 2021 to July 2023 were included. The primary endpoints were all-cause mortality and aorta-related mortality, while the secondary endpoints included stroke, myocardial infarction, secondary interventions, and readmission for any cause. Survival analysis was performed using Kaplan-Meier curves, and risk factors for primary endpoint events were analyzed using multivariate Cox regression. <b>Results:</b> A total of 254 AAS patients, aged (58.9±13.2) years were included in this study. There were 178 cases of aortic dissection, 69 cases of aortic intramural hematoma, and 7 cases of aortic penetrating ulcer. The median follow-up time was 545 days. Seventy-three all-cause deaths occurred among patients with AAS, including 61 aorta-related deaths; 3 strokes, 1 myocardial infarction, 9 secondary surgeries, and 35 readmissions for any cause were observed. Kaplan-Meier curve analysis demonstrated significant differences in all-cause mortality rates based on the Stanford classification, AAS disease classification, eGFR, and albumin levels (all <i>P</i><0.05), and similar results were also observed in aorta-related death (all <i>P<</i>0.05). Multivariate Cox regression suggested that albumin<35 g/L (<i>HR</i>=2.372, 95%<i>CI</i> 1.337-4.210, <i>P=</i>0.003), eGFR<90 ml·min<sup>-1</sup>·1.73 m<sup>-2</sup> (<i>HR</i>=2.457, 95%<i>CI</i> 1.261-4.786, <i>P=</i>0.008), and Stanford type A AAS (<i>HR</i>=3.420, 95%<i>CI</i> 1.998-5.856, <i>P<</i>0.001) were independent risk factors for all-cause mortality in AAS patients; albumin<35 g/L(<i>HR</i>=2.432, 95%<i>CI</i> 1.295-4.570, <i>P</i>=0.006), eGFR<90 ml·min<sup>-1</sup>·1.73 m<sup>-2</sup>(<i>HR</i>=2.523,95%<i>CI</i> 1.243-5.122,<i>P</i>=0.010), and Stanford type A AAS (<i>HR</i>=3.455,95%<i>CI</i> 1.819-6.564,<i>P<</i>0.001) were independent risk factors for aorta-related mortality in AAS patients. <b>Conclusions:</b> In the real world, the prognosis of patients with AAS remains pessimistic. Patients with type A AAS, renal dysfunction, hypoproteinemia may have a higher risk of poor prognosis.</p>","PeriodicalId":38755,"journal":{"name":"中华心血管病杂志","volume":"53 2","pages":"136-142"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"中华心血管病杂志","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3760/cma.j.cn112148-20240903-00507","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objective: To explore the prognosis of patients with acute aortic syndrome (AAS) in the real world and to examine the risk factors associated with poor outcomes in AAS. Methods: This is a single-center retrospective study. Patients diagnosed with AAS at Xinqiao Hospital from January 2021 to July 2023 were included. The primary endpoints were all-cause mortality and aorta-related mortality, while the secondary endpoints included stroke, myocardial infarction, secondary interventions, and readmission for any cause. Survival analysis was performed using Kaplan-Meier curves, and risk factors for primary endpoint events were analyzed using multivariate Cox regression. Results: A total of 254 AAS patients, aged (58.9±13.2) years were included in this study. There were 178 cases of aortic dissection, 69 cases of aortic intramural hematoma, and 7 cases of aortic penetrating ulcer. The median follow-up time was 545 days. Seventy-three all-cause deaths occurred among patients with AAS, including 61 aorta-related deaths; 3 strokes, 1 myocardial infarction, 9 secondary surgeries, and 35 readmissions for any cause were observed. Kaplan-Meier curve analysis demonstrated significant differences in all-cause mortality rates based on the Stanford classification, AAS disease classification, eGFR, and albumin levels (all P<0.05), and similar results were also observed in aorta-related death (all P<0.05). Multivariate Cox regression suggested that albumin<35 g/L (HR=2.372, 95%CI 1.337-4.210, P=0.003), eGFR<90 ml·min-1·1.73 m-2 (HR=2.457, 95%CI 1.261-4.786, P=0.008), and Stanford type A AAS (HR=3.420, 95%CI 1.998-5.856, P<0.001) were independent risk factors for all-cause mortality in AAS patients; albumin<35 g/L(HR=2.432, 95%CI 1.295-4.570, P=0.006), eGFR<90 ml·min-1·1.73 m-2(HR=2.523,95%CI 1.243-5.122,P=0.010), and Stanford type A AAS (HR=3.455,95%CI 1.819-6.564,P<0.001) were independent risk factors for aorta-related mortality in AAS patients. Conclusions: In the real world, the prognosis of patients with AAS remains pessimistic. Patients with type A AAS, renal dysfunction, hypoproteinemia may have a higher risk of poor prognosis.
中华心血管病杂志Medicine-Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
10577
期刊介绍:
The Chinese Journal of Cardiology , established in February 1973, is one of the major academic medical journals sponsored by the Chinese Medical Association and a leading periodical in the field of cardiology in China. It specializes in cardiology and related disciplines with a readership of more than 25 000. The journal publishes editorials and guidelines as well as important original articles on clinical and experimental investigations, reflecting achievements made in China and promoting academic communication between domestic and foreign cardiologists. The journal includes the following columns: Editorials, Strategies, Comments, Clinical Investigations, Experimental Investigations, Epidemiology and Prevention, Lectures, Comprehensive Reviews, Continuing Medical Education, etc.