Leakage pressures of partial and total lung lobectomies performed with thoracoabdominal staplers in cadaveric dogs.

IF 1.3 2区 农林科学 Q2 VETERINARY SCIENCES
Veterinary Surgery Pub Date : 2025-05-01 Epub Date: 2025-02-19 DOI:10.1111/vsu.14207
Yael Huerta, William T N Culp, Giacomo Gianotti, Nimar Gill, Darko Stefanovski, Maureen A Griffin
{"title":"Leakage pressures of partial and total lung lobectomies performed with thoracoabdominal staplers in cadaveric dogs.","authors":"Yael Huerta, William T N Culp, Giacomo Gianotti, Nimar Gill, Darko Stefanovski, Maureen A Griffin","doi":"10.1111/vsu.14207","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To compare leakage pressures of stapled partial and total lung lobectomies using thoracoabdominal (TA) staplers in canine cadaveric specimens.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>Ex vivo experimental study.</p><p><strong>Sample population: </strong>A total of 29 lung lobes from six canine cadavers.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Lower respiratory tracts were harvested from canine cadavers >15 kg. Lung lobes were randomized to groups: total lobectomy with a TA30-V3 (TL-30), partial lobectomy with two TA30-V3 cartridges in a wedge configuration (PL-30), and partial lobectomy with a TA60-3.5 mm (PL-60). The leakage pressure (pressure at which air bubbles were first seen from submerged tissue) was assessed, and groups were compared.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>All nine PL-30 and all nine PL-60 sites leaked at median pressures of 10 cm H<sub>2</sub>O (range 10-15) and 18 cm H<sub>2</sub>O (range 10-20), respectively. Only 1/11 TL-30 site leaked during testing at a pressure of 22 cm H<sub>2</sub>O. PL-30 and PL-60 sites were more likely to leak at 20 (OR: 437; 95% CI: 7.9-24 171; p = .003) and 30 (OR: 133; 95% CI: 4.8-3674.2; p = .003) cm H<sub>2</sub>O compared to TL-30 sites, and the leakage pressure was greater for TL-30 as compared to PL-30 (marginal effect: -46.14; 95% CI: -55.9 to -36.38; p < .001) and PL-60 (marginal effect: -41.2; 95% CI: -51.73 to -30.67; p < .001) sites. PL-60 leakage pressures were greater than those of PL-30 (marginal effect: 4.94; 95% CI: 1.43-8.44; p = .006).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In canine cadaveric lung, total lobectomies with a TA30-V3 were less likely to leak at physiological pressures than partial lobectomies with either TA30-V3 or TA60-3.5 mm staplers.</p><p><strong>Clinical significance: </strong>These results suggest a greater potential risk for air leakage at physiologically relevant pressures following partial as compared to total lobectomies with the TA stapling devices and techniques used commonly in veterinary surgery.</p>","PeriodicalId":23667,"journal":{"name":"Veterinary Surgery","volume":" ","pages":"724-730"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Veterinary Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/vsu.14207","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/19 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"VETERINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To compare leakage pressures of stapled partial and total lung lobectomies using thoracoabdominal (TA) staplers in canine cadaveric specimens.

Study design: Ex vivo experimental study.

Sample population: A total of 29 lung lobes from six canine cadavers.

Methods: Lower respiratory tracts were harvested from canine cadavers >15 kg. Lung lobes were randomized to groups: total lobectomy with a TA30-V3 (TL-30), partial lobectomy with two TA30-V3 cartridges in a wedge configuration (PL-30), and partial lobectomy with a TA60-3.5 mm (PL-60). The leakage pressure (pressure at which air bubbles were first seen from submerged tissue) was assessed, and groups were compared.

Results: All nine PL-30 and all nine PL-60 sites leaked at median pressures of 10 cm H2O (range 10-15) and 18 cm H2O (range 10-20), respectively. Only 1/11 TL-30 site leaked during testing at a pressure of 22 cm H2O. PL-30 and PL-60 sites were more likely to leak at 20 (OR: 437; 95% CI: 7.9-24 171; p = .003) and 30 (OR: 133; 95% CI: 4.8-3674.2; p = .003) cm H2O compared to TL-30 sites, and the leakage pressure was greater for TL-30 as compared to PL-30 (marginal effect: -46.14; 95% CI: -55.9 to -36.38; p < .001) and PL-60 (marginal effect: -41.2; 95% CI: -51.73 to -30.67; p < .001) sites. PL-60 leakage pressures were greater than those of PL-30 (marginal effect: 4.94; 95% CI: 1.43-8.44; p = .006).

Conclusion: In canine cadaveric lung, total lobectomies with a TA30-V3 were less likely to leak at physiological pressures than partial lobectomies with either TA30-V3 or TA60-3.5 mm staplers.

Clinical significance: These results suggest a greater potential risk for air leakage at physiologically relevant pressures following partial as compared to total lobectomies with the TA stapling devices and techniques used commonly in veterinary surgery.

胸腹吻合器在尸体犬部分肺叶和全肺叶切除术中的漏压分析。
目的:比较胸腹吻合器在犬尸体标本上缝合部分肺叶切除术和全肺叶切除术的漏压。研究设计:体外实验研究。样本群体:来自6具犬类尸体的29个肺叶。方法:取bb0 ~ 15kg犬尸体下呼吸道标本。肺叶随机分为三组:全肺叶切除术采用TA30-V3 (TL-30),部分肺叶切除术采用两个楔形配置的TA30-V3 (PL-30),部分肺叶切除术采用TA60-3.5 mm (PL-60)。评估泄漏压力(第一次从浸泡组织中看到气泡的压力),并进行组间比较。结果:所有9个PL-30和所有9个PL-60位点分别在10 cm H2O(范围10-15)和18 cm H2O(范围10-20)的中位压力下发生泄漏。在22 cm H2O压力下,只有1/11的TL-30位点发生泄漏。PL-30和PL-60位点在20时更容易泄漏(OR: 437;95% ci: 7.9-24 171;p = 0.003)和30 (OR: 133;95% ci: 4.8-3674.2;p = 0.003) cm H2O与TL-30位点相比,TL-30的泄漏压力大于PL-30(边际效应:-46.14;95% CI: -55.9 ~ -36.38;结论:在犬尸体肺中,使用TA30-V3的全肺叶切除术比使用TA30-V3或TA60-3.5 mm吻合器的部分肺叶切除术更不容易在生理压力下泄漏。临床意义:这些结果表明,与兽医外科中常用的TA吻合器和技术相比,在生理相关压力下,部分肺叶切除术后发生漏气的潜在风险更大。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Veterinary Surgery
Veterinary Surgery 农林科学-兽医学
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
22.20%
发文量
162
审稿时长
8-16 weeks
期刊介绍: Veterinary Surgery, the official publication of the American College of Veterinary Surgeons and European College of Veterinary Surgeons, is a source of up-to-date coverage of surgical and anesthetic management of animals, addressing significant problems in veterinary surgery with relevant case histories and observations. It contains original, peer-reviewed articles that cover developments in veterinary surgery, and presents the most current review of the field, with timely articles on surgical techniques, diagnostic aims, care of infections, and advances in knowledge of metabolism as it affects the surgical patient. The journal places new developments in perspective, encompassing new concepts and peer commentary to help better understand and evaluate the surgical patient.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信