Evaluating Skellytour for Automated Skeleton Segmentation from Whole-Body CT Images.

IF 8.1 Q1 COMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE
Daniel C Mann, Michael W Rutherford, Phillip Farmer, Joshua M Eichhorn, Fathima Fijula Palot Manzil, Christopher P Wardell
{"title":"Evaluating Skellytour for Automated Skeleton Segmentation from Whole-Body CT Images.","authors":"Daniel C Mann, Michael W Rutherford, Phillip Farmer, Joshua M Eichhorn, Fathima Fijula Palot Manzil, Christopher P Wardell","doi":"10.1148/ryai.240050","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Purpose To construct and evaluate the performance of a machine learning model for bone segmentation using whole-body CT images. Materials and Methods In this retrospective study, whole-body CT scans (from June 2010 to January 2018) from 90 patients (mean age, 61 years ± 9 [SD]; 45 male, 45 female) with multiple myeloma were manually segmented using 60 labels and subsegmented into cortical and trabecular bone. Segmentations were verified by board-certified radiology and nuclear medicine physicians. The impacts of isotropy, resolution, multiple labeling schemes, and postprocessing were assessed. Model performance was assessed on internal and external test datasets (362 scans) and benchmarked against the TotalSegmentator segmentation model. Performance was assessed using Dice similarity coefficient (DSC), normalized surface distance (NSD), and manual inspection. Results Skellytour achieved consistently high segmentation performance on the internal dataset (DSC: 0.94, NSD: 0.99) and two external datasets (DSC: 0.94, 0.96; NSD: 0.999, 1.0), outperforming TotalSegmentator on the first two datasets. Subsegmentation performance was also high (DSC: 0.95, NSD: 0.995). Skellytour produced finely detailed segmentations, even in low-density bones. Conclusion The study demonstrates that Skellytour is an accurate and generalizable bone segmentation and subsegmentation model for CT data; it is available as a Python package via GitHub <i>(https://github.com/cpwardell/Skellytour)</i>. <b>Keywords:</b> CT, Informatics, Skeletal-Axial, Demineralization-Bone, Comparative Studies, Segmentation, Supervised Learning, Convolutional Neural Network (CNN) <i>Supplemental material is available for this article.</i> Published under a CC BY 4.0 license. See also commentary by Khosravi and Rouzrokh in this issue.</p>","PeriodicalId":29787,"journal":{"name":"Radiology-Artificial Intelligence","volume":" ","pages":"e240050"},"PeriodicalIF":8.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Radiology-Artificial Intelligence","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1148/ryai.240050","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose To construct and evaluate the performance of a machine learning model for bone segmentation using whole-body CT images. Materials and Methods In this retrospective study, whole-body CT scans (from June 2010 to January 2018) from 90 patients (mean age, 61 years ± 9 [SD]; 45 male, 45 female) with multiple myeloma were manually segmented using 60 labels and subsegmented into cortical and trabecular bone. Segmentations were verified by board-certified radiology and nuclear medicine physicians. The impacts of isotropy, resolution, multiple labeling schemes, and postprocessing were assessed. Model performance was assessed on internal and external test datasets (362 scans) and benchmarked against the TotalSegmentator segmentation model. Performance was assessed using Dice similarity coefficient (DSC), normalized surface distance (NSD), and manual inspection. Results Skellytour achieved consistently high segmentation performance on the internal dataset (DSC: 0.94, NSD: 0.99) and two external datasets (DSC: 0.94, 0.96; NSD: 0.999, 1.0), outperforming TotalSegmentator on the first two datasets. Subsegmentation performance was also high (DSC: 0.95, NSD: 0.995). Skellytour produced finely detailed segmentations, even in low-density bones. Conclusion The study demonstrates that Skellytour is an accurate and generalizable bone segmentation and subsegmentation model for CT data; it is available as a Python package via GitHub (https://github.com/cpwardell/Skellytour). Keywords: CT, Informatics, Skeletal-Axial, Demineralization-Bone, Comparative Studies, Segmentation, Supervised Learning, Convolutional Neural Network (CNN) Supplemental material is available for this article. Published under a CC BY 4.0 license. See also commentary by Khosravi and Rouzrokh in this issue.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
16.20
自引率
1.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: Radiology: Artificial Intelligence is a bi-monthly publication that focuses on the emerging applications of machine learning and artificial intelligence in the field of imaging across various disciplines. This journal is available online and accepts multiple manuscript types, including Original Research, Technical Developments, Data Resources, Review articles, Editorials, Letters to the Editor and Replies, Special Reports, and AI in Brief.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信