Breakage of cementless press-fit femoral stems following total hip arthroplasty in dogs: 14 cases (2013-2023).

IF 1.3 2区 农林科学 Q2 VETERINARY SCIENCES
Jose L Carvajal, William M Karlin, Denis J Marcellin-Little, Michael P Kowaleski, Valentine D Verpaalen, Laurent P Guiot, Po-Yen Chou, Nicolas P Barthelemy, Peter J Lotsikas, Stanley E Kim
{"title":"Breakage of cementless press-fit femoral stems following total hip arthroplasty in dogs: 14 cases (2013-2023).","authors":"Jose L Carvajal, William M Karlin, Denis J Marcellin-Little, Michael P Kowaleski, Valentine D Verpaalen, Laurent P Guiot, Po-Yen Chou, Nicolas P Barthelemy, Peter J Lotsikas, Stanley E Kim","doi":"10.1111/vsu.14227","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To report breakage of press-fit cementless femoral stems in dogs after total hip arthroplasty (THA).</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>Retrospective case series.</p><p><strong>Animals: </strong>Thirteen dogs (14 stems).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Medical records were obtained for client-owned dogs that underwent THA between 2013 and 2023. Demographic data, implant type and size, time to stem breakage, and radiographic assessment of implant size were recorded. Implant size was compared with the manufacturers' guidelines based on body weight. Treatment-associated complications and overall outcomes were also recorded.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Fourteen broken stems were reported in 13 dogs. Thirteen were size #5, #6, or #7 Biologic Fixation (BFX) lateral bolt stems and one was a size #5 standard BFX stem. A +9 head was used in 5 of 11 cases with 17 mm diameter heads. The median time from THA to stem breakage was 522 days (interquartile range, 330-905 days). Ten of the 14 stems were radiographically undersized. The weights of 10 of 13 dogs were at, or exceeded, weight-limit guidelines. Eleven stems were revised with a new stem, two were explanted, and one was partially explanted. Major complications of revision included stem rebreakage, periprosthetic fracture, and pin and tension band-fixation failure. Full function was achieved in 9 of 10 dogs with revised stems based on owner and surgeon assessment.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Most of the stems that broke were BFX lateral bolt stems and were undersized both radiographically and in comparison with weight-limit guidelines. Revision can be successful, although the complication rate is high.</p><p><strong>Clinical significance: </strong>The use of small, undersized BFX lateral bolt stems should be avoided.</p>","PeriodicalId":23667,"journal":{"name":"Veterinary Surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Veterinary Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/vsu.14227","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"VETERINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To report breakage of press-fit cementless femoral stems in dogs after total hip arthroplasty (THA).

Study design: Retrospective case series.

Animals: Thirteen dogs (14 stems).

Methods: Medical records were obtained for client-owned dogs that underwent THA between 2013 and 2023. Demographic data, implant type and size, time to stem breakage, and radiographic assessment of implant size were recorded. Implant size was compared with the manufacturers' guidelines based on body weight. Treatment-associated complications and overall outcomes were also recorded.

Results: Fourteen broken stems were reported in 13 dogs. Thirteen were size #5, #6, or #7 Biologic Fixation (BFX) lateral bolt stems and one was a size #5 standard BFX stem. A +9 head was used in 5 of 11 cases with 17 mm diameter heads. The median time from THA to stem breakage was 522 days (interquartile range, 330-905 days). Ten of the 14 stems were radiographically undersized. The weights of 10 of 13 dogs were at, or exceeded, weight-limit guidelines. Eleven stems were revised with a new stem, two were explanted, and one was partially explanted. Major complications of revision included stem rebreakage, periprosthetic fracture, and pin and tension band-fixation failure. Full function was achieved in 9 of 10 dogs with revised stems based on owner and surgeon assessment.

Conclusion: Most of the stems that broke were BFX lateral bolt stems and were undersized both radiographically and in comparison with weight-limit guidelines. Revision can be successful, although the complication rate is high.

Clinical significance: The use of small, undersized BFX lateral bolt stems should be avoided.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Veterinary Surgery
Veterinary Surgery 农林科学-兽医学
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
22.20%
发文量
162
审稿时长
8-16 weeks
期刊介绍: Veterinary Surgery, the official publication of the American College of Veterinary Surgeons and European College of Veterinary Surgeons, is a source of up-to-date coverage of surgical and anesthetic management of animals, addressing significant problems in veterinary surgery with relevant case histories and observations. It contains original, peer-reviewed articles that cover developments in veterinary surgery, and presents the most current review of the field, with timely articles on surgical techniques, diagnostic aims, care of infections, and advances in knowledge of metabolism as it affects the surgical patient. The journal places new developments in perspective, encompassing new concepts and peer commentary to help better understand and evaluate the surgical patient.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信