Significance of Applying the New Diagnosis-Related Group Payment System in Patients With Mild Traumatic Brain Injury.

Q3 Medicine
Korean Journal of Neurotrauma Pub Date : 2025-01-21 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.13004/kjnt.2025.21.e3
Se Yun Kim, Jiwook Lee, Sun Geon Yoon, Min Soo Kim
{"title":"Significance of Applying the New Diagnosis-Related Group Payment System in Patients With Mild Traumatic Brain Injury.","authors":"Se Yun Kim, Jiwook Lee, Sun Geon Yoon, Min Soo Kim","doi":"10.13004/kjnt.2025.21.e3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The new diagnosis-related group (NDRG) payment combines the original diagnosis-related group (DRG) and the fee-for-service (FFS) system, covering basic hospital services through fixed hospitalization costs based on the DRG assigned to the patient, while separate fees were applied for surgical and procedural interventions by physicians. This study aimed to evaluate the impact of payment methodology on medical costs and outcomes in patients with mild traumatic brain injury (TBI).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective study included 1,247 patients who underwent inpatient neurosurgical treatment at a single regional trauma center from January 2016 to December 2022. Since the implementation of the NDRG payment system in 2019, patients were classified into the FFS and NDRG payment groups. Outcomes were evaluated using the Extended Glasgow Outcome Scale (GOS-E) at discharge and 3 months post-traumatic event; admission days were also assessed. Total medical and out-of-pocket expenses incurred at the time of discharge were also analyzed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The NDRG payment group demonstrated poorer results in GOS-E at discharge and 3 months post-TBI. However, the admission days were notably shorter. Out-of-pocket expenses were significantly lower in the NDRG payment group. While age, total medical expenses, and out-of-pocket expenses were significantly associated with the GOS-E at discharge, the NDRG payment did not correlate with the GOS-E at discharge. Notably, only the NDRG payment was significantly correlated with lower out-of-pocket expenses.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Implementing the NDRG payment system for patients with mild TBI does not impact total medical costs but effectively reduces out-of-pocket expenses, without adversely affecting the GOS-E.</p>","PeriodicalId":36879,"journal":{"name":"Korean Journal of Neurotrauma","volume":"21 1","pages":"46-52"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11832279/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Korean Journal of Neurotrauma","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.13004/kjnt.2025.21.e3","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: The new diagnosis-related group (NDRG) payment combines the original diagnosis-related group (DRG) and the fee-for-service (FFS) system, covering basic hospital services through fixed hospitalization costs based on the DRG assigned to the patient, while separate fees were applied for surgical and procedural interventions by physicians. This study aimed to evaluate the impact of payment methodology on medical costs and outcomes in patients with mild traumatic brain injury (TBI).

Methods: This retrospective study included 1,247 patients who underwent inpatient neurosurgical treatment at a single regional trauma center from January 2016 to December 2022. Since the implementation of the NDRG payment system in 2019, patients were classified into the FFS and NDRG payment groups. Outcomes were evaluated using the Extended Glasgow Outcome Scale (GOS-E) at discharge and 3 months post-traumatic event; admission days were also assessed. Total medical and out-of-pocket expenses incurred at the time of discharge were also analyzed.

Results: The NDRG payment group demonstrated poorer results in GOS-E at discharge and 3 months post-TBI. However, the admission days were notably shorter. Out-of-pocket expenses were significantly lower in the NDRG payment group. While age, total medical expenses, and out-of-pocket expenses were significantly associated with the GOS-E at discharge, the NDRG payment did not correlate with the GOS-E at discharge. Notably, only the NDRG payment was significantly correlated with lower out-of-pocket expenses.

Conclusion: Implementing the NDRG payment system for patients with mild TBI does not impact total medical costs but effectively reduces out-of-pocket expenses, without adversely affecting the GOS-E.

新型诊断相关团体支付制度在轻度颅脑损伤患者中的应用意义
目的:新型诊断相关组(NDRG)支付将原有的诊断相关组(DRG)与按服务收费(FFS)制度相结合,根据分配给患者的DRG,通过固定住院费用覆盖医院的基本服务,而医生的手术和程序干预则单独收费。本研究旨在评估支付方法对轻度创伤性脑损伤(TBI)患者医疗费用和预后的影响。方法:本回顾性研究纳入了2016年1月至2022年12月在单一区域创伤中心接受住院神经外科治疗的1247例患者。自2019年实施NDRG支付制度以来,将患者分为FFS和NDRG支付组。在出院和创伤事件后3个月使用扩展格拉斯哥结局量表(GOS-E)评估结果;入院天数也进行了评估。还分析了出院时发生的总医疗费用和自付费用。结果:NDRG支付组在出院时和tbi后3个月的GOS-E结果较差。然而,入院时间明显缩短。NDRG支付组的自付费用明显较低。虽然年龄、总医疗费用和自付费用与出院时的GOS-E显著相关,但NDRG付款与出院时的GOS-E无关。值得注意的是,只有NDRG支付与较低的自付费用显著相关。结论:对轻度创伤性脑损伤患者实施NDRG支付制度,不影响总医疗费用,但可有效降低患者自付费用,对GOS-E无不利影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
41
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信