The Role of the Lumbar Paravertebral Muscles in the Development of Short-term Residual Pain after Lumbar Fusion Surgery.

IF 2.6 2区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Spine Pub Date : 2025-02-19 DOI:10.1097/BRS.0000000000005303
Haifu Sun, Wenxiang Tang, Xingyu You, Lei Deng, Liuyu Chen, Zhonglai Qian, Huilin Yang, Jun Zou, Yusen Qiao, Hao Liu
{"title":"The Role of the Lumbar Paravertebral Muscles in the Development of Short-term Residual Pain after Lumbar Fusion Surgery.","authors":"Haifu Sun, Wenxiang Tang, Xingyu You, Lei Deng, Liuyu Chen, Zhonglai Qian, Huilin Yang, Jun Zou, Yusen Qiao, Hao Liu","doi":"10.1097/BRS.0000000000005303","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Study design: </strong>A retrospective real-world study.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>Using machine learning models to identify risk factors for residual pain after PLIF in patients with degenerative lumbar spine disease.</p><p><strong>Summary of background data: </strong>Residual pain after PLIF is a frequent phenomenon, and the specific risk factors for residual pain are not known.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Between June 2018 and March 2023, 936 patients with lumbar degenerative disease who underwent PLIF surgery were recruited. Group A (n=501) had <7 days of VAS ≥3 pain within 1 month post-PLIF, while Group B (n=435) had ≥7 days. Imaging outcomes included PMI, MMI, MMD, lumbar lordosis (LL), and LL improvement rate. Functional outcomes were assessed by VAS. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were used to determine the potential risk of short-term postoperative pain. Risk factors were identified using machine learning models and predicted whether residual pain would occur.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 435 (46.5%) patients experienced residual postoperative pain. Independent risk factors included surgical segment, PMI, MMI, and depression level. The Random Forest Model model had an accuracy of 95.7%, a sensitivity of 96.4%, a specificity of 94.1%, and an F1 score of approximately 95.2% for predicting recurrent pain, indicating high reliability and generalizability.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our study reveals risk factors for the development of residual pain after PLIF. Compared to the group with residual pain, the group without pain had more robust paravertebral muscles, improved psychological characteristics and a greater LL improvement rate. These factors may represent targets for pre-operative and peri-operative optimization as a means to minimize the potential for residual pain following PLIF.</p>","PeriodicalId":22193,"journal":{"name":"Spine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Spine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0000000000005303","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Study design: A retrospective real-world study.

Objective: Using machine learning models to identify risk factors for residual pain after PLIF in patients with degenerative lumbar spine disease.

Summary of background data: Residual pain after PLIF is a frequent phenomenon, and the specific risk factors for residual pain are not known.

Materials and methods: Between June 2018 and March 2023, 936 patients with lumbar degenerative disease who underwent PLIF surgery were recruited. Group A (n=501) had <7 days of VAS ≥3 pain within 1 month post-PLIF, while Group B (n=435) had ≥7 days. Imaging outcomes included PMI, MMI, MMD, lumbar lordosis (LL), and LL improvement rate. Functional outcomes were assessed by VAS. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were used to determine the potential risk of short-term postoperative pain. Risk factors were identified using machine learning models and predicted whether residual pain would occur.

Results: A total of 435 (46.5%) patients experienced residual postoperative pain. Independent risk factors included surgical segment, PMI, MMI, and depression level. The Random Forest Model model had an accuracy of 95.7%, a sensitivity of 96.4%, a specificity of 94.1%, and an F1 score of approximately 95.2% for predicting recurrent pain, indicating high reliability and generalizability.

Conclusions: Our study reveals risk factors for the development of residual pain after PLIF. Compared to the group with residual pain, the group without pain had more robust paravertebral muscles, improved psychological characteristics and a greater LL improvement rate. These factors may represent targets for pre-operative and peri-operative optimization as a means to minimize the potential for residual pain following PLIF.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Spine
Spine 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
5.90
自引率
6.70%
发文量
361
审稿时长
6.0 months
期刊介绍: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins is a leading international publisher of professional health information for physicians, nurses, specialized clinicians and students. For a complete listing of titles currently published by Lippincott Williams & Wilkins and detailed information about print, online, and other offerings, please visit the LWW Online Store. Recognized internationally as the leading journal in its field, Spine is an international, peer-reviewed, bi-weekly periodical that considers for publication original articles in the field of Spine. It is the leading subspecialty journal for the treatment of spinal disorders. Only original papers are considered for publication with the understanding that they are contributed solely to Spine. The Journal does not publish articles reporting material that has been reported at length elsewhere.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信