Remote Care: The Future of Cochlear Implants.

IF 1.9 3区 医学 Q3 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Otology & Neurotology Pub Date : 2025-04-01 Epub Date: 2025-02-04 DOI:10.1097/MAO.0000000000004432
Meredith A Holcomb, Jennifer Coto, Tina Stern, Christina M Sarangoulis, Ivette Cejas, Chrisanda M Sanchez
{"title":"Remote Care: The Future of Cochlear Implants.","authors":"Meredith A Holcomb, Jennifer Coto, Tina Stern, Christina M Sarangoulis, Ivette Cejas, Chrisanda M Sanchez","doi":"10.1097/MAO.0000000000004432","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The aims of this study were to 1) evaluate whether remote cochlear implant (CI) programming has comparable outcomes to traditional in-person CI management, 1) determine the effects of remote programming on family burden and associated costs, and 1) demonstrate feasibility and satisfaction of remote programming by patients and families for both the adult and pediatric CI populations.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>Prospective study of one CI program.</p><p><strong>Patients and intervention: </strong>Adult and pediatric patients with at least one CI underwent CI programming via in-person and remote visits.</p><p><strong>Main outcome measures: </strong>CI programming parameters (impedances, neural response telemetry, upper and lower stimulation levels, datalogging), technology comfort self-report, visit burden and satisfaction, mental health and quality of life.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Fifteen pediatric participants (mean age: 4.17 yr; SD = 3.24) and 15 adult participants (mean age: 56.73 yr; SD = 21.11) were enrolled. In-person and remote programming sessions yielded comparable results for measuring CI programming parameters. Adult and parent participants were highly satisfied with remote programming and reported receiving excellent care. Listening effort was significantly less for the remote visit as compared to the in-person visit for adults. Burden of care to attend the in-person visit was greater for the pediatric population in terms of expenses incurred, unpaid time off work, and coordination of care for other children.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Remote programming is a feasible and effective service delivery model for the adult and pediatric CI population. Inclusion of remote services into postoperative CI protocols should be considered as a means of reducing barriers to hearing healthcare.</p>","PeriodicalId":19732,"journal":{"name":"Otology & Neurotology","volume":" ","pages":"372-380"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Otology & Neurotology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/MAO.0000000000004432","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/4 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: The aims of this study were to 1) evaluate whether remote cochlear implant (CI) programming has comparable outcomes to traditional in-person CI management, 1) determine the effects of remote programming on family burden and associated costs, and 1) demonstrate feasibility and satisfaction of remote programming by patients and families for both the adult and pediatric CI populations.

Study design: Prospective study of one CI program.

Patients and intervention: Adult and pediatric patients with at least one CI underwent CI programming via in-person and remote visits.

Main outcome measures: CI programming parameters (impedances, neural response telemetry, upper and lower stimulation levels, datalogging), technology comfort self-report, visit burden and satisfaction, mental health and quality of life.

Results: Fifteen pediatric participants (mean age: 4.17 yr; SD = 3.24) and 15 adult participants (mean age: 56.73 yr; SD = 21.11) were enrolled. In-person and remote programming sessions yielded comparable results for measuring CI programming parameters. Adult and parent participants were highly satisfied with remote programming and reported receiving excellent care. Listening effort was significantly less for the remote visit as compared to the in-person visit for adults. Burden of care to attend the in-person visit was greater for the pediatric population in terms of expenses incurred, unpaid time off work, and coordination of care for other children.

Conclusions: Remote programming is a feasible and effective service delivery model for the adult and pediatric CI population. Inclusion of remote services into postoperative CI protocols should be considered as a means of reducing barriers to hearing healthcare.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Otology & Neurotology
Otology & Neurotology 医学-耳鼻喉科学
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
14.30%
发文量
509
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: ​​​​​Otology & Neurotology publishes original articles relating to both clinical and basic science aspects of otology, neurotology, and cranial base surgery. As the foremost journal in its field, it has become the favored place for publishing the best of new science relating to the human ear and its diseases. The broadly international character of its contributing authors, editorial board, and readership provides the Journal its decidedly global perspective.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信