Myocardial Perfusion Imaging Versus Coronary CT Angiography for the Detection of Coronary Artery Disease.

Q2 Medicine
Medical Journal of the Islamic Republic of Iran Pub Date : 2024-11-25 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.47176/mjiri.38.136
Farnaz Fariba, Seyed Kamaledin Hadei, Hossein ForughiMoghadam, Maryam Alvandi, Sara Zebarjadi
{"title":"Myocardial Perfusion Imaging Versus Coronary CT Angiography for the Detection of Coronary Artery Disease.","authors":"Farnaz Fariba, Seyed Kamaledin Hadei, Hossein ForughiMoghadam, Maryam Alvandi, Sara Zebarjadi","doi":"10.47176/mjiri.38.136","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Considering the importance of early diagnosis of coronary artery disease (CAD) in reducing subsequent complications, non-invasive tests, especially myocardial perfusion imaging (MPI) and coronary CT angiography (CCTA) play a pivotal role in this regard. Therefore, a study was conducted to compare the diagnostic results of these two methods.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A cross-sectional study was conducted on 51 patients who underwent MPI and CCTA and 18 patients whose noninvasive test was positive and high risk underwent invasive coronary angiography (ICA) at Farshchian Heart Center, Hamadan, Iran, during one year (2019-2020). The data including demographic characteristics as well as the histories of dyslipidemia, smoking, positive family history, hypertension, and diabetes, was collected using a checklist. Descriptive statistics, independent samples t-tests, and chi-square tests and Sensitivity, Specificity and Positive predictive value, Negative predictive value and Roc Curve were applied for data analysis. For data analysis, the SPSS software version 21 was used. P values less than 0.05 were considered.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mean age of the patients, including 29 males (56.9%) and 22 females (43.1%), was 60.11±8.99 years. No significant correlation was found between the results of MPI and CCTA compared to ICA. CCTA demonstrated higher sensitivity (100% versus 88%), higher specificity (33% versus 0%), and higher accuracy (66% versus 44%) than MPI. Furthermore, CCTA performed better in terms of positive predictive value (60% versus 47%) than MPI. The overall diagnostic accuracy of MPI when CCTA is considered as a reference, according to the area under the Rock's curve, which is equal to 0.691, is relatively good. Based on the calculated optimal Yoden index, the appropriate cut point is SSS≥8. on the other hand, MPI can be useful in functional evaluation and has important rules in moderate stenosis.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Considering the high sensitivity and accuracy of CCTA compared to MPI, CTCA, and MPI provide differing information for CAD from respective angles. The correlation between CTCA and MPI is supplemental rather than substitutional.</p>","PeriodicalId":18361,"journal":{"name":"Medical Journal of the Islamic Republic of Iran","volume":"38 ","pages":"136"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11835396/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medical Journal of the Islamic Republic of Iran","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.47176/mjiri.38.136","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Considering the importance of early diagnosis of coronary artery disease (CAD) in reducing subsequent complications, non-invasive tests, especially myocardial perfusion imaging (MPI) and coronary CT angiography (CCTA) play a pivotal role in this regard. Therefore, a study was conducted to compare the diagnostic results of these two methods.

Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted on 51 patients who underwent MPI and CCTA and 18 patients whose noninvasive test was positive and high risk underwent invasive coronary angiography (ICA) at Farshchian Heart Center, Hamadan, Iran, during one year (2019-2020). The data including demographic characteristics as well as the histories of dyslipidemia, smoking, positive family history, hypertension, and diabetes, was collected using a checklist. Descriptive statistics, independent samples t-tests, and chi-square tests and Sensitivity, Specificity and Positive predictive value, Negative predictive value and Roc Curve were applied for data analysis. For data analysis, the SPSS software version 21 was used. P values less than 0.05 were considered.

Results: The mean age of the patients, including 29 males (56.9%) and 22 females (43.1%), was 60.11±8.99 years. No significant correlation was found between the results of MPI and CCTA compared to ICA. CCTA demonstrated higher sensitivity (100% versus 88%), higher specificity (33% versus 0%), and higher accuracy (66% versus 44%) than MPI. Furthermore, CCTA performed better in terms of positive predictive value (60% versus 47%) than MPI. The overall diagnostic accuracy of MPI when CCTA is considered as a reference, according to the area under the Rock's curve, which is equal to 0.691, is relatively good. Based on the calculated optimal Yoden index, the appropriate cut point is SSS≥8. on the other hand, MPI can be useful in functional evaluation and has important rules in moderate stenosis.

Conclusion: Considering the high sensitivity and accuracy of CCTA compared to MPI, CTCA, and MPI provide differing information for CAD from respective angles. The correlation between CTCA and MPI is supplemental rather than substitutional.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
90
审稿时长
8 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信