Myocardial Perfusion Imaging Versus Coronary CT Angiography for the Detection of Coronary Artery Disease.

Q2 Medicine
Medical Journal of the Islamic Republic of Iran Pub Date : 2024-11-25 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.47176/mjiri.38.136
Farnaz Fariba, Seyed Kamaledin Hadei, Hossein ForughiMoghadam, Maryam Alvandi, Sara Zebarjadi
{"title":"Myocardial Perfusion Imaging Versus Coronary CT Angiography for the Detection of Coronary Artery Disease.","authors":"Farnaz Fariba, Seyed Kamaledin Hadei, Hossein ForughiMoghadam, Maryam Alvandi, Sara Zebarjadi","doi":"10.47176/mjiri.38.136","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Considering the importance of early diagnosis of coronary artery disease (CAD) in reducing subsequent complications, non-invasive tests, especially myocardial perfusion imaging (MPI) and coronary CT angiography (CCTA) play a pivotal role in this regard. Therefore, a study was conducted to compare the diagnostic results of these two methods.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A cross-sectional study was conducted on 51 patients who underwent MPI and CCTA and 18 patients whose noninvasive test was positive and high risk underwent invasive coronary angiography (ICA) at Farshchian Heart Center, Hamadan, Iran, during one year (2019-2020). The data including demographic characteristics as well as the histories of dyslipidemia, smoking, positive family history, hypertension, and diabetes, was collected using a checklist. Descriptive statistics, independent samples t-tests, and chi-square tests and Sensitivity, Specificity and Positive predictive value, Negative predictive value and Roc Curve were applied for data analysis. For data analysis, the SPSS software version 21 was used. P values less than 0.05 were considered.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mean age of the patients, including 29 males (56.9%) and 22 females (43.1%), was 60.11±8.99 years. No significant correlation was found between the results of MPI and CCTA compared to ICA. CCTA demonstrated higher sensitivity (100% versus 88%), higher specificity (33% versus 0%), and higher accuracy (66% versus 44%) than MPI. Furthermore, CCTA performed better in terms of positive predictive value (60% versus 47%) than MPI. The overall diagnostic accuracy of MPI when CCTA is considered as a reference, according to the area under the Rock's curve, which is equal to 0.691, is relatively good. Based on the calculated optimal Yoden index, the appropriate cut point is SSS≥8. on the other hand, MPI can be useful in functional evaluation and has important rules in moderate stenosis.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Considering the high sensitivity and accuracy of CCTA compared to MPI, CTCA, and MPI provide differing information for CAD from respective angles. The correlation between CTCA and MPI is supplemental rather than substitutional.</p>","PeriodicalId":18361,"journal":{"name":"Medical Journal of the Islamic Republic of Iran","volume":"38 ","pages":"136"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11835396/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medical Journal of the Islamic Republic of Iran","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.47176/mjiri.38.136","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Considering the importance of early diagnosis of coronary artery disease (CAD) in reducing subsequent complications, non-invasive tests, especially myocardial perfusion imaging (MPI) and coronary CT angiography (CCTA) play a pivotal role in this regard. Therefore, a study was conducted to compare the diagnostic results of these two methods.

Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted on 51 patients who underwent MPI and CCTA and 18 patients whose noninvasive test was positive and high risk underwent invasive coronary angiography (ICA) at Farshchian Heart Center, Hamadan, Iran, during one year (2019-2020). The data including demographic characteristics as well as the histories of dyslipidemia, smoking, positive family history, hypertension, and diabetes, was collected using a checklist. Descriptive statistics, independent samples t-tests, and chi-square tests and Sensitivity, Specificity and Positive predictive value, Negative predictive value and Roc Curve were applied for data analysis. For data analysis, the SPSS software version 21 was used. P values less than 0.05 were considered.

Results: The mean age of the patients, including 29 males (56.9%) and 22 females (43.1%), was 60.11±8.99 years. No significant correlation was found between the results of MPI and CCTA compared to ICA. CCTA demonstrated higher sensitivity (100% versus 88%), higher specificity (33% versus 0%), and higher accuracy (66% versus 44%) than MPI. Furthermore, CCTA performed better in terms of positive predictive value (60% versus 47%) than MPI. The overall diagnostic accuracy of MPI when CCTA is considered as a reference, according to the area under the Rock's curve, which is equal to 0.691, is relatively good. Based on the calculated optimal Yoden index, the appropriate cut point is SSS≥8. on the other hand, MPI can be useful in functional evaluation and has important rules in moderate stenosis.

Conclusion: Considering the high sensitivity and accuracy of CCTA compared to MPI, CTCA, and MPI provide differing information for CAD from respective angles. The correlation between CTCA and MPI is supplemental rather than substitutional.

心肌灌注显像与冠状动脉CT血管造影检测冠状动脉疾病的比较。
背景:考虑到早期诊断冠状动脉疾病(CAD)对减少后续并发症的重要性,无创检查,特别是心肌灌注成像(MPI)和冠状动脉CT血管造影(CCTA)在这方面发挥着关键作用。因此,本研究比较两种方法的诊断结果。方法:在伊朗哈马丹Farshchian心脏中心对51例MPI和CCTA患者以及18例无创检查阳性和高危患者进行有创冠状动脉造影(ICA)的横断面研究,为期一年(2019-2020年)。数据包括人口统计学特征以及血脂异常史、吸烟史、阳性家族史、高血压史和糖尿病史,采用核对表收集。采用描述性统计、独立样本t检验、卡方检验和敏感性、特异性、阳性预测值、阴性预测值、Roc曲线进行数据分析。数据分析采用SPSS软件第21版。考虑P值小于0.05。结果:患者平均年龄为60.11±8.99岁,其中男性29例(56.9%),女性22例(43.1%)。与ICA相比,MPI和CCTA的结果没有明显的相关性。CCTA表现出比MPI更高的敏感性(100%对88%),更高的特异性(33%对0%)和更高的准确性(66%对44%)。此外,CCTA在阳性预测值方面比MPI表现更好(60%对47%)。以CCTA作为参考时,MPI的整体诊断准确率相对较好,根据Rock's curve下的面积为0.691。根据计算出的最优约登指数,最佳切割点为SSS≥8。另一方面,MPI可用于功能评估,在中度狭窄中具有重要的规则。结论:考虑到CCTA比MPI具有更高的灵敏度和准确性,CTCA和MPI从不同的角度为CAD提供了不同的信息。CTCA与MPI之间的相关性是补充关系,而不是替代关系。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
90
审稿时长
8 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信