Associations between connectivity in functional brain networks and gait speed in older adults with and without multiple sclerosis.

IF 4.8 2区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Siddharth Nayak, Mark E Wagshul, Frederick W Foley, Robert W Motl, Roee Holtzer
{"title":"Associations between connectivity in functional brain networks and gait speed in older adults with and without multiple sclerosis.","authors":"Siddharth Nayak, Mark E Wagshul, Frederick W Foley, Robert W Motl, Roee Holtzer","doi":"10.1007/s00415-025-12955-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To assess whether resting-state functional connectivity (RSFC) brain networks are associated with gait speed in a sample of older adults with and without multiple sclerosis (MS).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Older adults with MS (OAMS: n = 82, mean age = 64.4 ± 4.1 years) and controls (n = 85, mean age = 68.6 ± 7.1 years) underwent brain MRI, cognitive assessment, and motor testing. RSFC brain networks were computed from resting-state functional scans based on a data-driven approach. The timed-25-foot-walk test (T25FW), an established measure of disability in aging and clinical populations, served as the outcome measure.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Analyses adjusted for confounders revealed that faster gait speed was significantly associated with higher RSFC in left fronto-parietal (p = 0.002) network in the full cohort. Among OAMS, significant associations between faster gait speed and higher RSFC were found in left fronto-parietal (p = 0.002), cerebellar (p = 0.023), and language (p = 0.046) networks. In contrast, among control participants, there were no significant associations between RSFC and gait speed.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In aging, greater functional brain support of walking speed, operationalized using RSFC in empirically derived networks, is required in MS compared to healthy control participants.</p>","PeriodicalId":16558,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Neurology","volume":"272 3","pages":"216"},"PeriodicalIF":4.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Neurology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00415-025-12955-y","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To assess whether resting-state functional connectivity (RSFC) brain networks are associated with gait speed in a sample of older adults with and without multiple sclerosis (MS).

Methods: Older adults with MS (OAMS: n = 82, mean age = 64.4 ± 4.1 years) and controls (n = 85, mean age = 68.6 ± 7.1 years) underwent brain MRI, cognitive assessment, and motor testing. RSFC brain networks were computed from resting-state functional scans based on a data-driven approach. The timed-25-foot-walk test (T25FW), an established measure of disability in aging and clinical populations, served as the outcome measure.

Results: Analyses adjusted for confounders revealed that faster gait speed was significantly associated with higher RSFC in left fronto-parietal (p = 0.002) network in the full cohort. Among OAMS, significant associations between faster gait speed and higher RSFC were found in left fronto-parietal (p = 0.002), cerebellar (p = 0.023), and language (p = 0.046) networks. In contrast, among control participants, there were no significant associations between RSFC and gait speed.

Conclusion: In aging, greater functional brain support of walking speed, operationalized using RSFC in empirically derived networks, is required in MS compared to healthy control participants.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Neurology
Journal of Neurology 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
10.00
自引率
5.00%
发文量
558
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Neurology is an international peer-reviewed journal which provides a source for publishing original communications and reviews on clinical neurology covering the whole field. In addition, Letters to the Editors serve as a forum for clinical cases and the exchange of ideas which highlight important new findings. A section on Neurological progress serves to summarise the major findings in certain fields of neurology. Commentaries on new developments in clinical neuroscience, which may be commissioned or submitted, are published as editorials. Every neurologist interested in the current diagnosis and treatment of neurological disorders needs access to the information contained in this valuable journal.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信