Siddharth Nayak, Mark E Wagshul, Frederick W Foley, Robert W Motl, Roee Holtzer
{"title":"Associations between connectivity in functional brain networks and gait speed in older adults with and without multiple sclerosis.","authors":"Siddharth Nayak, Mark E Wagshul, Frederick W Foley, Robert W Motl, Roee Holtzer","doi":"10.1007/s00415-025-12955-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To assess whether resting-state functional connectivity (RSFC) brain networks are associated with gait speed in a sample of older adults with and without multiple sclerosis (MS).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Older adults with MS (OAMS: n = 82, mean age = 64.4 ± 4.1 years) and controls (n = 85, mean age = 68.6 ± 7.1 years) underwent brain MRI, cognitive assessment, and motor testing. RSFC brain networks were computed from resting-state functional scans based on a data-driven approach. The timed-25-foot-walk test (T25FW), an established measure of disability in aging and clinical populations, served as the outcome measure.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Analyses adjusted for confounders revealed that faster gait speed was significantly associated with higher RSFC in left fronto-parietal (p = 0.002) network in the full cohort. Among OAMS, significant associations between faster gait speed and higher RSFC were found in left fronto-parietal (p = 0.002), cerebellar (p = 0.023), and language (p = 0.046) networks. In contrast, among control participants, there were no significant associations between RSFC and gait speed.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In aging, greater functional brain support of walking speed, operationalized using RSFC in empirically derived networks, is required in MS compared to healthy control participants.</p>","PeriodicalId":16558,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Neurology","volume":"272 3","pages":"216"},"PeriodicalIF":4.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Neurology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00415-025-12955-y","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objective: To assess whether resting-state functional connectivity (RSFC) brain networks are associated with gait speed in a sample of older adults with and without multiple sclerosis (MS).
Methods: Older adults with MS (OAMS: n = 82, mean age = 64.4 ± 4.1 years) and controls (n = 85, mean age = 68.6 ± 7.1 years) underwent brain MRI, cognitive assessment, and motor testing. RSFC brain networks were computed from resting-state functional scans based on a data-driven approach. The timed-25-foot-walk test (T25FW), an established measure of disability in aging and clinical populations, served as the outcome measure.
Results: Analyses adjusted for confounders revealed that faster gait speed was significantly associated with higher RSFC in left fronto-parietal (p = 0.002) network in the full cohort. Among OAMS, significant associations between faster gait speed and higher RSFC were found in left fronto-parietal (p = 0.002), cerebellar (p = 0.023), and language (p = 0.046) networks. In contrast, among control participants, there were no significant associations between RSFC and gait speed.
Conclusion: In aging, greater functional brain support of walking speed, operationalized using RSFC in empirically derived networks, is required in MS compared to healthy control participants.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Neurology is an international peer-reviewed journal which provides a source for publishing original communications and reviews on clinical neurology covering the whole field.
In addition, Letters to the Editors serve as a forum for clinical cases and the exchange of ideas which highlight important new findings. A section on Neurological progress serves to summarise the major findings in certain fields of neurology. Commentaries on new developments in clinical neuroscience, which may be commissioned or submitted, are published as editorials.
Every neurologist interested in the current diagnosis and treatment of neurological disorders needs access to the information contained in this valuable journal.