Devon Jeltema, Kennady Knox, Nicole Dobbs, Zhen Tang, Cong Xing, Antonina Araskiewicz, Kun Yang, Ivan Rodriguez Siordia, Jason Matthews, Michael Cohen, Nan Yan
{"title":"PARP7 inhibits type I interferon signaling to prevent autoimmunity and lung disease.","authors":"Devon Jeltema, Kennady Knox, Nicole Dobbs, Zhen Tang, Cong Xing, Antonina Araskiewicz, Kun Yang, Ivan Rodriguez Siordia, Jason Matthews, Michael Cohen, Nan Yan","doi":"10.1084/jem.20241184","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Type I IFN (IFN-I) induce hundreds of antiviral genes as well as negative regulators that limit IFN-I signaling. Here, we investigate the family of 16 PARPs and find that 11 PARPs are ISGs, of which 8 PARPs inhibit IFN-I production. PARP7 is the most potent negative feedback regulator of IFN-I production. Using Parp7-/- and Parp7H532A/H532A mice, we show that PARP7 loss leads to systemic autoimmunity characterized by splenomegaly and increased autoantibodies and inflammatory cytokines. PARP7 loss also results in perivascular immune infiltration in the lung that forms tertiary lymphoid structures. Mechanistically, PARP7 inhibits multiple innate immune pathways in a cell-intrinsic and MARylation-dependent manner. PARP7 interacts with IRF3 through the catalytic domain and disrupts the IRF3:CBP/p300 transcriptional holocomplex required for IFN-I production. Irf3-/- or Irf3S1/S1 (transcription defective) or Sting-/- rescues Parp7H532A/H532A mouse autoimmunity and lung disease. Together, our study reveals physiological functions of PARP7 as a negative feedback regulator of IFN-I production that maintains immune homeostasis particularly in the lung.</p>","PeriodicalId":15760,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Experimental Medicine","volume":"222 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":12.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11837972/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Experimental Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1084/jem.20241184","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/19 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"IMMUNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Type I IFN (IFN-I) induce hundreds of antiviral genes as well as negative regulators that limit IFN-I signaling. Here, we investigate the family of 16 PARPs and find that 11 PARPs are ISGs, of which 8 PARPs inhibit IFN-I production. PARP7 is the most potent negative feedback regulator of IFN-I production. Using Parp7-/- and Parp7H532A/H532A mice, we show that PARP7 loss leads to systemic autoimmunity characterized by splenomegaly and increased autoantibodies and inflammatory cytokines. PARP7 loss also results in perivascular immune infiltration in the lung that forms tertiary lymphoid structures. Mechanistically, PARP7 inhibits multiple innate immune pathways in a cell-intrinsic and MARylation-dependent manner. PARP7 interacts with IRF3 through the catalytic domain and disrupts the IRF3:CBP/p300 transcriptional holocomplex required for IFN-I production. Irf3-/- or Irf3S1/S1 (transcription defective) or Sting-/- rescues Parp7H532A/H532A mouse autoimmunity and lung disease. Together, our study reveals physiological functions of PARP7 as a negative feedback regulator of IFN-I production that maintains immune homeostasis particularly in the lung.
期刊介绍:
Since its establishment in 1896, the Journal of Experimental Medicine (JEM) has steadfastly pursued the publication of enduring and exceptional studies in medical biology. In an era where numerous publishing groups are introducing specialized journals, we recognize the importance of offering a distinguished platform for studies that seamlessly integrate various disciplines within the pathogenesis field.
Our unique editorial system, driven by a commitment to exceptional author service, involves two collaborative groups of editors: professional editors with robust scientific backgrounds and full-time practicing scientists. Each paper undergoes evaluation by at least one editor from both groups before external review. Weekly editorial meetings facilitate comprehensive discussions on papers, incorporating external referee comments, and ensure swift decisions without unnecessary demands for extensive revisions.
Encompassing human studies and diverse in vivo experimental models of human disease, our focus within medical biology spans genetics, inflammation, immunity, infectious disease, cancer, vascular biology, metabolic disorders, neuroscience, and stem cell biology. We eagerly welcome reports ranging from atomic-level analyses to clinical interventions that unveil new mechanistic insights.