Randomized crossover comparison of two teriparatide self-injection regimens for primary osteoporosis: Interim report (end of 52-week treatment) of the Japanese Osteoporosis Intervention Trial 06 (JOINT-06).

IF 2.4 3区 医学 Q3 ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM
Satoshi Soen, Yukari Uemura, Shiro Tanaka, Yasuhiro Takeuchi, Naoto Endo, Junichi Takada, Satoshi Ikeda, Jun Iwamoto, Nobukazu Okimoto, Sakae Tanaka
{"title":"Randomized crossover comparison of two teriparatide self-injection regimens for primary osteoporosis: Interim report (end of 52-week treatment) of the Japanese Osteoporosis Intervention Trial 06 (JOINT-06).","authors":"Satoshi Soen, Yukari Uemura, Shiro Tanaka, Yasuhiro Takeuchi, Naoto Endo, Junichi Takada, Satoshi Ikeda, Jun Iwamoto, Nobukazu Okimoto, Sakae Tanaka","doi":"10.1007/s00774-025-01586-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Patient satisfaction with two teriparatide (TPTD) self-injection regimens [once-daily (1/D)-TPTD and twice-weekly (2/W)-TPTD] was compared in a randomized crossover study involving patients with osteoporosis at high fracture risk.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Questionnaires evaluated overall satisfaction, satisfaction with treatment effectiveness, satisfaction with utility of the self-injection device, and preference for a particular injection regimen after crossover. Quality of life (QOL), visual analogue scale pain scores, and bone mineral density (BMD) were also analyzed. Safety was evaluated based on the incidence and severity of adverse events (AEs).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The 1/D-TPTD and 2/W-TPTD groups comprised 180 (mean age: 75.9 ± 7.3 years) and 178 (75.4 ± 6.9 years) patients, respectively. After 26 weeks of treatment, the injection regimens were switched and treatment continued for another 26 weeks. Significantly higher persistence was observed in the 1/D-TPTD to 2/W-TPTD group (p = 0.032). No significant between-group differences in overall satisfaction scores or satisfaction with treatment were observed. Satisfaction with the utility of the injection device was significantly higher with the 2/W-TPTD regimen (p < 0.05); this regimen was preferred by 69.4% of patients after crossover (p < 0.001). A significant increase in BMD from baseline was observed at the lumbar vertebrae in both groups and at the hip area in the 1/D-TPTD to 2/W-TPTD group at 52 weeks (p < 0.05). Significant improvement in the QOL score was observed in both groups (p < 0.05). No serious AEs were reported.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Continuation of this study will further clarify patient satisfaction, treatment effects, and tolerability.</p>","PeriodicalId":15116,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Bone and Mineral Metabolism","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Bone and Mineral Metabolism","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00774-025-01586-y","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Patient satisfaction with two teriparatide (TPTD) self-injection regimens [once-daily (1/D)-TPTD and twice-weekly (2/W)-TPTD] was compared in a randomized crossover study involving patients with osteoporosis at high fracture risk.

Materials and methods: Questionnaires evaluated overall satisfaction, satisfaction with treatment effectiveness, satisfaction with utility of the self-injection device, and preference for a particular injection regimen after crossover. Quality of life (QOL), visual analogue scale pain scores, and bone mineral density (BMD) were also analyzed. Safety was evaluated based on the incidence and severity of adverse events (AEs).

Results: The 1/D-TPTD and 2/W-TPTD groups comprised 180 (mean age: 75.9 ± 7.3 years) and 178 (75.4 ± 6.9 years) patients, respectively. After 26 weeks of treatment, the injection regimens were switched and treatment continued for another 26 weeks. Significantly higher persistence was observed in the 1/D-TPTD to 2/W-TPTD group (p = 0.032). No significant between-group differences in overall satisfaction scores or satisfaction with treatment were observed. Satisfaction with the utility of the injection device was significantly higher with the 2/W-TPTD regimen (p < 0.05); this regimen was preferred by 69.4% of patients after crossover (p < 0.001). A significant increase in BMD from baseline was observed at the lumbar vertebrae in both groups and at the hip area in the 1/D-TPTD to 2/W-TPTD group at 52 weeks (p < 0.05). Significant improvement in the QOL score was observed in both groups (p < 0.05). No serious AEs were reported.

Conclusion: Continuation of this study will further clarify patient satisfaction, treatment effects, and tolerability.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Bone and Mineral Metabolism
Journal of Bone and Mineral Metabolism 医学-内分泌学与代谢
CiteScore
6.30
自引率
3.00%
发文量
89
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Bone and Mineral Metabolism (JBMM) provides an international forum for researchers and clinicians to present and discuss topics relevant to bone, teeth, and mineral metabolism, as well as joint and musculoskeletal disorders. The journal welcomes the submission of manuscripts from any country. Membership in the society is not a prerequisite for submission. Acceptance is based on the originality, significance, and validity of the material presented. The journal is aimed at researchers and clinicians dedicated to improvements in research, development, and patient-care in the fields of bone and mineral metabolism.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信