Individuals Dispensed Buprenorphine in the United States Before and After Federal Policy Changes Aimed at Increasing Access.

IF 4.2 3区 医学 Q1 SUBSTANCE ABUSE
Gery P Guy, Christopher M Jones, Michaela Rikard, Andrea E Strahan, Kun Zhang, Yngvild Olsen
{"title":"Individuals Dispensed Buprenorphine in the United States Before and After Federal Policy Changes Aimed at Increasing Access.","authors":"Gery P Guy, Christopher M Jones, Michaela Rikard, Andrea E Strahan, Kun Zhang, Yngvild Olsen","doi":"10.1097/ADM.0000000000001457","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Buprenorphine can decrease opioid use disorder and mortality risk but remains underutilized. This study evaluates changes in monthly buprenorphine dispensing associated with federal policy changes in the United States from 2018 to 2023.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study used interrupted time series analysis comparing the monthly rate of patients dispensed buprenorphine after the implementation of telehealth flexibilities in March 2020, relaxation of training requirements in April 2021, and removal of waiver requirements in December 2022. Buprenorphine formulated for opioid use disorder was included from the IQVIA Total Patient Tracker.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Before March 2020, the monthly rate of individuals dispensed buprenorphine was increasing. The rate of increase slowed after each policy change: -0.69 (95% CI=-1.00 to -0.39) after telehealth flexibilities were initiated, -0.60 (95% CI=-0.92 to -0.27) after relaxing training requirements, and -0.49 (95% CI=-0.73 to -0.24) after waiver elimination. After the elimination of the waiver, declines were observed across several specialty groups, including pain medicine, emergency medicine, and primary care, while the rate increased among addiction medicine specialists.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>After each policy change, the rate of individuals dispensed buprenorphine increased at a slower rate than before each policy change. These findings suggest that the removal of the waiver, while important, may not be sufficient on its own to meaningfully expand buprenorphine prescribing. Individual and systems-level strategies may be needed to fully optimize the impact of these policy changes focusing on reducing patient, clinician, and institutional stigma, addressing clinician barriers, implementing systems-level improvements, and strengthening payment policies that incentivize prescribing.</p>","PeriodicalId":14744,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Addiction Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Addiction Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/ADM.0000000000001457","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SUBSTANCE ABUSE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: Buprenorphine can decrease opioid use disorder and mortality risk but remains underutilized. This study evaluates changes in monthly buprenorphine dispensing associated with federal policy changes in the United States from 2018 to 2023.

Methods: This study used interrupted time series analysis comparing the monthly rate of patients dispensed buprenorphine after the implementation of telehealth flexibilities in March 2020, relaxation of training requirements in April 2021, and removal of waiver requirements in December 2022. Buprenorphine formulated for opioid use disorder was included from the IQVIA Total Patient Tracker.

Results: Before March 2020, the monthly rate of individuals dispensed buprenorphine was increasing. The rate of increase slowed after each policy change: -0.69 (95% CI=-1.00 to -0.39) after telehealth flexibilities were initiated, -0.60 (95% CI=-0.92 to -0.27) after relaxing training requirements, and -0.49 (95% CI=-0.73 to -0.24) after waiver elimination. After the elimination of the waiver, declines were observed across several specialty groups, including pain medicine, emergency medicine, and primary care, while the rate increased among addiction medicine specialists.

Conclusions: After each policy change, the rate of individuals dispensed buprenorphine increased at a slower rate than before each policy change. These findings suggest that the removal of the waiver, while important, may not be sufficient on its own to meaningfully expand buprenorphine prescribing. Individual and systems-level strategies may be needed to fully optimize the impact of these policy changes focusing on reducing patient, clinician, and institutional stigma, addressing clinician barriers, implementing systems-level improvements, and strengthening payment policies that incentivize prescribing.

个人配药丁丙诺啡在美国之前和之后的联邦政策变化旨在增加获取。
目的:丁丙诺啡可以降低阿片类药物使用障碍和死亡风险,但仍未得到充分利用。本研究评估了2018年至2023年美国与联邦政策变化相关的每月丁丙诺啡配药的变化。方法:本研究采用中断时间序列分析,比较2020年3月实施远程医疗灵活性、2021年4月放宽培训要求和2022年12月取消豁免要求后每月分配丁丙诺啡的患者比例。为阿片类药物使用障碍配制的丁丙诺啡从IQVIA总患者跟踪器中纳入。结果:2020年3月前,丁丙诺啡个人每月配药率呈上升趋势。每次政策变化后,增长率有所放缓:远程医疗灵活性启动后,增长率为-0.69 (95% CI=-1.00至-0.39);放松培训要求后,增长率为-0.60 (95% CI=-0.92至-0.27);取消豁免后,增长率为-0.49 (95% CI=-0.73至-0.24)。在取消豁免后,包括疼痛医学、急诊医学和初级保健在内的几个专业群体的比例都有所下降,而成瘾医学专家的比例有所上升。结论:每次政策变化后,丁丙诺啡个人配药率的增长速度均低于每次政策变化前。这些发现表明,取消豁免虽然重要,但可能不足以有意义地扩大丁丙诺啡的处方。可能需要个人和系统层面的战略来充分优化这些政策变化的影响,重点是减少患者、临床医生和机构的耻辱感,解决临床医生的障碍,实施系统层面的改进,并加强激励处方的支付政策。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Addiction Medicine
Journal of Addiction Medicine 医学-药物滥用
CiteScore
6.10
自引率
9.10%
发文量
260
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The mission of Journal of Addiction Medicine, the official peer-reviewed journal of the American Society of Addiction Medicine, is to promote excellence in the practice of addiction medicine and in clinical research as well as to support Addiction Medicine as a mainstream medical sub-specialty. Under the guidance of an esteemed Editorial Board, peer-reviewed articles published in the Journal focus on developments in addiction medicine as well as on treatment innovations and ethical, economic, forensic, and social topics including: •addiction and substance use in pregnancy •adolescent addiction and at-risk use •the drug-exposed neonate •pharmacology •all psychoactive substances relevant to addiction, including alcohol, nicotine, caffeine, marijuana, opioids, stimulants and other prescription and illicit substances •diagnosis •neuroimaging techniques •treatment of special populations •treatment, early intervention and prevention of alcohol and drug use disorders •methodological issues in addiction research •pain and addiction, prescription drug use disorder •co-occurring addiction, medical and psychiatric disorders •pathological gambling disorder, sexual and other behavioral addictions •pathophysiology of addiction •behavioral and pharmacological treatments •issues in graduate medical education •recovery •health services delivery •ethical, legal and liability issues in addiction medicine practice •drug testing •self- and mutual-help.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信