A randomised controlled trial comparing three clinical administration strategies in spectral detector CT pulmonary angiography with low contrast medium dose.
IF 4.7 2区 医学Q1 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
Cathrine Helgestad Kristiansen, Owen Thomas, Anton Bengt Nyquist, Audun Sanderud, Joao Boavida, Jonn Terje Geitung, Thien Trung Tran, Peter Mæhre Lauritzen
{"title":"A randomised controlled trial comparing three clinical administration strategies in spectral detector CT pulmonary angiography with low contrast medium dose.","authors":"Cathrine Helgestad Kristiansen, Owen Thomas, Anton Bengt Nyquist, Audun Sanderud, Joao Boavida, Jonn Terje Geitung, Thien Trung Tran, Peter Mæhre Lauritzen","doi":"10.1007/s00330-025-11420-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To compare vascular attenuation (VA) with three strategies for administering a low contrast medium (CM) dose in dual-layer spectral detector CT pulmonary angiography (CTPA).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients were prospectively randomised into control- or one of two experimental groups. Control group patients received CM (350 mgI/mL) diluted 1:1 with saline. Experimental group B received CM (350 mgI/mL) with low flow. Experimental group C received CM with low concentration (140 mgI/mL). Virtual monoenergetic images at 40 and 55 kiloelectron Volt (keV) were reconstructed. Objective examination quality (OEQ) i.e., VA, noise, and signal-to-noise ratio, was measured and subjective examination quality (SEQ) was rated at three anatomical levels: in the pulmonary trunk (PT), the interlobar arteries and the posterior basal segmental arteries.</p><p><strong>Primary outcome: </strong>VA in PT at 40 keV.</p><p><strong>Secondary outcomes: </strong>OEQ and SEQ across all anatomic levels.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 328 patients were randomised. 112 vs 115 and 101 were analysed in the control (A) vs experimental groups (B and C), respectively. There were no differences in VA in PT between the groups: A vs B (p = 0.96), B vs C (p = 0.14), and A vs C (p = 0.18). Group C showed higher VA across all anatomical levels. There were no differences in SEQ.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>There was no difference in the attenuation in the PT between the dilution-, low flow-, and low concentration groups. However, the low concentration group showed higher attenuation in the pulmonary arteries when all anatomical levels were assessed.</p><p><strong>Key points: </strong>Question Contrast medium reduction may be accomplished with dilution, low flow, or low concentration. However, the effect of the different strategies on vascular attenuation is unknown. Findings There was no difference in pulmonary trunk attenuation between the three strategies on spectral detector CT pulmonary angiography. Clinical relevance Low contrast medium dose spectral detector CT pulmonary angiography may be implemented with the administration strategy of the unit's own choice.</p>","PeriodicalId":12076,"journal":{"name":"European Radiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Radiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-025-11420-8","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objectives: To compare vascular attenuation (VA) with three strategies for administering a low contrast medium (CM) dose in dual-layer spectral detector CT pulmonary angiography (CTPA).
Methods: Patients were prospectively randomised into control- or one of two experimental groups. Control group patients received CM (350 mgI/mL) diluted 1:1 with saline. Experimental group B received CM (350 mgI/mL) with low flow. Experimental group C received CM with low concentration (140 mgI/mL). Virtual monoenergetic images at 40 and 55 kiloelectron Volt (keV) were reconstructed. Objective examination quality (OEQ) i.e., VA, noise, and signal-to-noise ratio, was measured and subjective examination quality (SEQ) was rated at three anatomical levels: in the pulmonary trunk (PT), the interlobar arteries and the posterior basal segmental arteries.
Primary outcome: VA in PT at 40 keV.
Secondary outcomes: OEQ and SEQ across all anatomic levels.
Results: A total of 328 patients were randomised. 112 vs 115 and 101 were analysed in the control (A) vs experimental groups (B and C), respectively. There were no differences in VA in PT between the groups: A vs B (p = 0.96), B vs C (p = 0.14), and A vs C (p = 0.18). Group C showed higher VA across all anatomical levels. There were no differences in SEQ.
Conclusion: There was no difference in the attenuation in the PT between the dilution-, low flow-, and low concentration groups. However, the low concentration group showed higher attenuation in the pulmonary arteries when all anatomical levels were assessed.
Key points: Question Contrast medium reduction may be accomplished with dilution, low flow, or low concentration. However, the effect of the different strategies on vascular attenuation is unknown. Findings There was no difference in pulmonary trunk attenuation between the three strategies on spectral detector CT pulmonary angiography. Clinical relevance Low contrast medium dose spectral detector CT pulmonary angiography may be implemented with the administration strategy of the unit's own choice.
期刊介绍:
European Radiology (ER) continuously updates scientific knowledge in radiology by publication of strong original articles and state-of-the-art reviews written by leading radiologists. A well balanced combination of review articles, original papers, short communications from European radiological congresses and information on society matters makes ER an indispensable source for current information in this field.
This is the Journal of the European Society of Radiology, and the official journal of a number of societies.
From 2004-2008 supplements to European Radiology were published under its companion, European Radiology Supplements, ISSN 1613-3749.