Jennie S Kim, Chih Ying Chien, Meghan R Lewis, Elizabeth R Benjamin, Demetrios Demetriades
{"title":"Surgical rib fixation in patients with cardiopulmonary disease improves outcomes.","authors":"Jennie S Kim, Chih Ying Chien, Meghan R Lewis, Elizabeth R Benjamin, Demetrios Demetriades","doi":"10.1007/s00068-025-02792-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The role of rib fixation (RF) in flail chest is debated, and guidelines conditionally recommend RF in highly selected patients. Patients with cardiopulmonary disease (CPD) have traditionally not been deemed surgical candidates. We hypothesize that RF would benefit even high-risk patients with CPD.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Adult patients with isolated flail chest and CPD were identified from the Trauma Quality Improvement Program database (2016-2018). Hospital transfers, patients dead within 72 h, penetrating mechanism, concomitant thoracic aortic injury or cancer were excluded. Primary outcome was in-hospital mortality. Secondary outcomes were in-hospital complications, ventilator days, need for tracheostomy, and length of stay. RF patients were propensity score matched (1:1) to non-operative management (NOM) patients. Multivariate regression identified independent risk factors for outcomes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In this 3 year period, 4614 patients were admitted with flail chest and history of CPD. After exclusions and propensity matching, 544 (12%) underwent analysis (RF n = 272, NOM n = 272). RF patients had a lower mortality compared to NOM patients (1.8% vs 5.5%, p = 0.023) but more likely to develop venous thromboembolic events (5.1% vs 1.85%, p = 0.036), prolonged ventilation (28.4% vs 15.1%, p < 0.001), and tracheostomy (15.4% vs 6.6%, p = 0.001). Multivariate analysis showed RF was independently associated with decreased mortality (OR 0.165, 95% CI 0.037-0.735, p = 0.018) while age > 85 years (OR 145.115, 95% CI 9.721-2166.262) and ventilator-associated pneumonia (OR 8.283, 95% CI 1.375-49.888) were associated with increased mortality.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>RF shows a survival benefit even in high-risk patients with CPD. Patient selection should be individualized but RF should not be excluded based solely on pre-existing conditions.</p>","PeriodicalId":12064,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Trauma and Emergency Surgery","volume":"51 1","pages":"114"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Trauma and Emergency Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00068-025-02792-z","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EMERGENCY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Introduction: The role of rib fixation (RF) in flail chest is debated, and guidelines conditionally recommend RF in highly selected patients. Patients with cardiopulmonary disease (CPD) have traditionally not been deemed surgical candidates. We hypothesize that RF would benefit even high-risk patients with CPD.
Methods: Adult patients with isolated flail chest and CPD were identified from the Trauma Quality Improvement Program database (2016-2018). Hospital transfers, patients dead within 72 h, penetrating mechanism, concomitant thoracic aortic injury or cancer were excluded. Primary outcome was in-hospital mortality. Secondary outcomes were in-hospital complications, ventilator days, need for tracheostomy, and length of stay. RF patients were propensity score matched (1:1) to non-operative management (NOM) patients. Multivariate regression identified independent risk factors for outcomes.
Results: In this 3 year period, 4614 patients were admitted with flail chest and history of CPD. After exclusions and propensity matching, 544 (12%) underwent analysis (RF n = 272, NOM n = 272). RF patients had a lower mortality compared to NOM patients (1.8% vs 5.5%, p = 0.023) but more likely to develop venous thromboembolic events (5.1% vs 1.85%, p = 0.036), prolonged ventilation (28.4% vs 15.1%, p < 0.001), and tracheostomy (15.4% vs 6.6%, p = 0.001). Multivariate analysis showed RF was independently associated with decreased mortality (OR 0.165, 95% CI 0.037-0.735, p = 0.018) while age > 85 years (OR 145.115, 95% CI 9.721-2166.262) and ventilator-associated pneumonia (OR 8.283, 95% CI 1.375-49.888) were associated with increased mortality.
Conclusions: RF shows a survival benefit even in high-risk patients with CPD. Patient selection should be individualized but RF should not be excluded based solely on pre-existing conditions.
简介:肋骨固定(RF)在连枷胸中的作用是有争议的,指南有条件地推荐在高度选定的患者中使用RF。心肺疾病(CPD)患者传统上不被认为是手术候选人。我们假设射频治疗对高危CPD患者也有益处。方法:从创伤质量改善计划数据库(2016-2018)中确定孤立性连枷胸和CPD的成年患者。排除转院、72 h内死亡、穿透机制、合并胸主动脉损伤或癌症。主要终点是住院死亡率。次要结局是住院并发症、呼吸机天数、气管切开术需要和住院时间。RF患者与非手术治疗(NOM)患者倾向评分匹配(1:1)。多变量回归确定了影响结果的独立危险因素。结果:在这3年中,4614例患者因连枷胸和CPD病史入院。排除和倾向匹配后,544例(12%)进行了分析(RF n = 272, NOM n = 272)。与NOM患者相比,RF患者的死亡率较低(1.8% vs 5.5%, p = 0.023),但更容易发生静脉血栓栓塞事件(5.1% vs 1.85%, p = 0.036),延长通气时间(28.4% vs 15.1%, p = 85年(OR 145.115, 95% CI 9.721-2166.262)和呼吸机相关肺炎(OR 8.283, 95% CI 1.375-49.888)与死亡率增加相关。结论:即使在高风险CPD患者中,RF也显示出生存益处。患者的选择应个体化,但不应仅根据既往疾病排除RF。
期刊介绍:
The European Journal of Trauma and Emergency Surgery aims to open an interdisciplinary forum that allows for the scientific exchange between basic and clinical science related to pathophysiology, diagnostics and treatment of traumatized patients. The journal covers all aspects of clinical management, operative treatment and related research of traumatic injuries.
Clinical and experimental papers on issues relevant for the improvement of trauma care are published. Reviews, original articles, short communications and letters allow the appropriate presentation of major and minor topics.