Aaditya Venkatesha Babu Bangaru, Stuart J Williams
{"title":"Numerical Simulation Noise and Its Significant Impact on the Dielectrophoretic Motion of Particles Near the Electrode Edges.","authors":"Aaditya Venkatesha Babu Bangaru, Stuart J Williams","doi":"10.1002/elps.8115","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Dielectrophoresis (DEP) has been extensively researched over the years for filtration, separation, detection, and collection of micro/nano/bioparticles. Numerical models have historically been employed to predict particle trajectories in three-dimensional (3D) DEP systems, but a common issue arises due to inherent noise near the edges of electrodes due to electric potential discontinuity, specifically when calculating electric field and gradient of electric field-squared, <math> <semantics> <mrow><mrow><mo>∇</mo> <mo>|</mo> <mi>E</mi></mrow> <msup><mo>|</mo> <mn>2</mn></msup> </mrow> <annotation>$\\nabla |E{|^2}$</annotation></semantics> </math> . This noise can be reduced to a certain extent with a finer mesh density but results near the electrode edge still have significant error. Realizing the importance of particle-electrode edge interactions prevalent in positive DEP systems, analytical solutions given by Sun et al. was incorporated to demonstrate an improved 3D model of interdigitated electrodes. The results of electric field and gradient of electric field-squared of the numerical model and the improved analytical 3D model were compared, within a simulation space of 50 µm height, 10 µm width, and 50 µm length with interdigitated electrodes of the same width and gap of 10 µm. The DEP particle trajectory error due to the noise was quantified for different particle sizes at various heights above the electrode edge. For example, at 5 V<sub>rms</sub>, a trapped 500 nm particles exhibited a velocity error of 10<sup>4</sup> µm/s (it should have been zero).</p>","PeriodicalId":11596,"journal":{"name":"ELECTROPHORESIS","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ELECTROPHORESIS","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/elps.8115","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BIOCHEMICAL RESEARCH METHODS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Dielectrophoresis (DEP) has been extensively researched over the years for filtration, separation, detection, and collection of micro/nano/bioparticles. Numerical models have historically been employed to predict particle trajectories in three-dimensional (3D) DEP systems, but a common issue arises due to inherent noise near the edges of electrodes due to electric potential discontinuity, specifically when calculating electric field and gradient of electric field-squared, . This noise can be reduced to a certain extent with a finer mesh density but results near the electrode edge still have significant error. Realizing the importance of particle-electrode edge interactions prevalent in positive DEP systems, analytical solutions given by Sun et al. was incorporated to demonstrate an improved 3D model of interdigitated electrodes. The results of electric field and gradient of electric field-squared of the numerical model and the improved analytical 3D model were compared, within a simulation space of 50 µm height, 10 µm width, and 50 µm length with interdigitated electrodes of the same width and gap of 10 µm. The DEP particle trajectory error due to the noise was quantified for different particle sizes at various heights above the electrode edge. For example, at 5 Vrms, a trapped 500 nm particles exhibited a velocity error of 104 µm/s (it should have been zero).
期刊介绍:
ELECTROPHORESIS is an international journal that publishes original manuscripts on all aspects of electrophoresis, and liquid phase separations (e.g., HPLC, micro- and nano-LC, UHPLC, micro- and nano-fluidics, liquid-phase micro-extractions, etc.).
Topics include new or improved analytical and preparative methods, sample preparation, development of theory, and innovative applications of electrophoretic and liquid phase separations methods in the study of nucleic acids, proteins, carbohydrates natural products, pharmaceuticals, food analysis, environmental species and other compounds of importance to the life sciences.
Papers in the areas of microfluidics and proteomics, which are not limited to electrophoresis-based methods, will also be accepted for publication. Contributions focused on hyphenated and omics techniques are also of interest. Proteomics is within the scope, if related to its fundamentals and new technical approaches. Proteomics applications are only considered in particular cases.
Papers describing the application of standard electrophoretic methods will not be considered.
Papers on nanoanalysis intended for publication in ELECTROPHORESIS should focus on one or more of the following topics:
• Nanoscale electrokinetics and phenomena related to electric double layer and/or confinement in nano-sized geometry
• Single cell and subcellular analysis
• Nanosensors and ultrasensitive detection aspects (e.g., involving quantum dots, "nanoelectrodes" or nanospray MS)
• Nanoscale/nanopore DNA sequencing (next generation sequencing)
• Micro- and nanoscale sample preparation
• Nanoparticles and cells analyses by dielectrophoresis
• Separation-based analysis using nanoparticles, nanotubes and nanowires.