{"title":"Laser for genitourinary syndrome of menopause: what we know and what we need to know.","authors":"Fiona G Li, Jason Abbott","doi":"10.1080/13697137.2025.2455186","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Energy-based treatments, including the fractional CO<sub>2</sub> laser, have been widely used for treatment of genitourinary symptoms associated with menopause. With the availability of data from seven double-blind sham-controlled randomized trials, the evidence does not support the fractional CO<sub>2</sub> laser as an efficacious treatment for genitourinary syndrome of menopause (GSM). A 2024 meta-analysis of these trials demonstrated that the symptom with greatest absolute improvement was dyspareunia at 16.3%, although not statistically significant. This improvement is far less than previously anticipated based on prospective data that suggested promising improvements of more than 90% satisfaction following laser treatment. Other data, including those from unblinded studies which are subject to a placebo effect, and outcomes that are not participant-reported including the appearance of the vagina on examination and histology, are not reliable in determining efficacy of laser treatment for GSM. While there may be a clinical effect of laser over sham treatments for GSM, the effect is unlikely to be clinically meaningful. Until we define and demonstrate a minimal clinically important difference in a robust and appropriately powered study, the laser should not be used in a clinical context for GSM.</p>","PeriodicalId":10213,"journal":{"name":"Climacteric","volume":" ","pages":"1-9"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Climacteric","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13697137.2025.2455186","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Energy-based treatments, including the fractional CO2 laser, have been widely used for treatment of genitourinary symptoms associated with menopause. With the availability of data from seven double-blind sham-controlled randomized trials, the evidence does not support the fractional CO2 laser as an efficacious treatment for genitourinary syndrome of menopause (GSM). A 2024 meta-analysis of these trials demonstrated that the symptom with greatest absolute improvement was dyspareunia at 16.3%, although not statistically significant. This improvement is far less than previously anticipated based on prospective data that suggested promising improvements of more than 90% satisfaction following laser treatment. Other data, including those from unblinded studies which are subject to a placebo effect, and outcomes that are not participant-reported including the appearance of the vagina on examination and histology, are not reliable in determining efficacy of laser treatment for GSM. While there may be a clinical effect of laser over sham treatments for GSM, the effect is unlikely to be clinically meaningful. Until we define and demonstrate a minimal clinically important difference in a robust and appropriately powered study, the laser should not be used in a clinical context for GSM.
期刊介绍:
Climacteric is the official journal of the International Menopause Society (IMS). As an international peer-reviewed journal it publishes original research and reviews of all aspects of aging in women.
Climacteric was founded by the IMS in 1998 and today has become a leading journal in the publication of peer-reviewed papers on the menopause, climacteric and mid-life health. Topics covered include endocrine changes, symptoms attributed to the menopause and their treatment, hormone replacement and alternative therapies, lifestyles, and the counselling and education of peri- and postmenopausal women. Climacteric, published bimonthly, also features regular invited reviews, editorials and commentaries on recent developments.
The editorial review board of Climacteric includes leading scientific and clinical experts in the field of midlife medicine and research and is headed by its Editor-in-Chief, Professor Rod Baber of Australia. He and his team of Associate Editors act independently to set a clear editorial policy, co-ordinate peer review, and ensure a rapid response to submitted papers.