Perceptual differences in olfactory fat discrimination are not detected in neural activation.

IF 2.8 4区 心理学 Q1 BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES
Matjaž Pirc, Catoo Krale, Paul Smeets, Sanne Boesveldt
{"title":"Perceptual differences in olfactory fat discrimination are not detected in neural activation.","authors":"Matjaž Pirc, Catoo Krale, Paul Smeets, Sanne Boesveldt","doi":"10.1093/chemse/bjaf007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Olfaction is involved in detecting, identifying, and discriminating dietary fat within foods, yet the underlying neural mechanisms remain uncharted. Our functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) study investigated the neural correlates of olfactory fat perception and their association with discrimination ability in a complex food matrix. We measured brain activation resulting from orthonasal exposure to an ecologically relevant fat-related odor source-dairy milk, manipulated to contain 0%, 3.5%, or 14% fat. Twenty-six healthy, normosmic adults underwent olfactory fat content discrimination testing, followed by an fMRI task during which the 3 odor stimuli were delivered via an olfactometer (25 times/fat level) and rated on perceived intensity and liking. Participants discriminated between all fat levels, with fat level influencing perceived odor intensity and liking. These perceptual differences, however, were not reflected in differential brain activation. Brain activation differences were observed only when comparing odor exposure with no exposure. Specifically, in response to any odor, activation occurred in the anterior part of the supplementary motor area (SMA) while deactivating parts of the hippocampus, putamen, superior temporal gyrus, anterior cingulate cortex, insula, and posterior part of the SMA. Exposure to the 0% fat odor also activated the thalamus. No associations were found between perceived intensity and liking and neural responses. Results reaffirm the human ability to distinguish food fat content using solely olfactory cues and reveal a divergence between sensory perception and neural processing. Subsequent research should replicate and extend these findings onto retronasal fat perception while also examining potential effects of hunger, genetics, and dietary habits.</p>","PeriodicalId":9771,"journal":{"name":"Chemical Senses","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11931621/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Chemical Senses","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/chemse/bjaf007","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Olfaction is involved in detecting, identifying, and discriminating dietary fat within foods, yet the underlying neural mechanisms remain uncharted. Our functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) study investigated the neural correlates of olfactory fat perception and their association with discrimination ability in a complex food matrix. We measured brain activation resulting from orthonasal exposure to an ecologically relevant fat-related odor source-dairy milk, manipulated to contain 0%, 3.5%, or 14% fat. Twenty-six healthy, normosmic adults underwent olfactory fat content discrimination testing, followed by an fMRI task during which the 3 odor stimuli were delivered via an olfactometer (25 times/fat level) and rated on perceived intensity and liking. Participants discriminated between all fat levels, with fat level influencing perceived odor intensity and liking. These perceptual differences, however, were not reflected in differential brain activation. Brain activation differences were observed only when comparing odor exposure with no exposure. Specifically, in response to any odor, activation occurred in the anterior part of the supplementary motor area (SMA) while deactivating parts of the hippocampus, putamen, superior temporal gyrus, anterior cingulate cortex, insula, and posterior part of the SMA. Exposure to the 0% fat odor also activated the thalamus. No associations were found between perceived intensity and liking and neural responses. Results reaffirm the human ability to distinguish food fat content using solely olfactory cues and reveal a divergence between sensory perception and neural processing. Subsequent research should replicate and extend these findings onto retronasal fat perception while also examining potential effects of hunger, genetics, and dietary habits.

嗅觉脂肪辨别的知觉差异在神经激活中不被检测到。
嗅觉参与检测、识别和区分食物中的膳食脂肪,但其潜在的神经机制尚不清楚。我们的fMRI研究探讨了嗅觉脂肪感知的神经关联及其与复杂食物基质中辨别能力的关系。我们测量了正鼻暴露于与生态相关的脂肪相关气味源——牛奶——导致的大脑激活,牛奶被控制为含有0%、3.5%或14%的脂肪。26名健康、正常的成年人接受了嗅觉脂肪含量辨别测试,随后进行了功能磁共振成像任务,在此过程中,通过嗅觉计(25倍/脂肪水平)传递三种气味刺激,并对感知强度和喜爱程度进行评分。参与者区分了所有脂肪水平,脂肪水平影响感知到的气味强度和喜欢程度。然而,这些感知上的差异并没有反映在不同的大脑激活上。只有在气味暴露和没有气味暴露的情况下,才会观察到大脑活动的差异。具体来说,在对任何气味做出反应时,辅助运动区域的前部被激活,而海马、壳核、颞上回、前扣带皮层、岛叶和辅助运动区域的后部被失活。暴露在0%脂肪的气味中也激活了丘脑。没有发现感知强度和喜欢以及神经反应之间的联系。研究结果再次证实了人类仅凭嗅觉线索区分食物脂肪含量的能力,并揭示了感官知觉和神经处理之间的差异。后续的研究应该将这些发现复制并扩展到鼻后脂肪感知上,同时也研究饥饿、基因和饮食习惯的潜在影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Chemical Senses
Chemical Senses 医学-行为科学
CiteScore
8.60
自引率
2.90%
发文量
25
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Chemical Senses publishes original research and review papers on all aspects of chemoreception in both humans and animals. An important part of the journal''s coverage is devoted to techniques and the development and application of new methods for investigating chemoreception and chemosensory structures.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信