Reversal of Head and Neck Cancer Risk after the Cessation of Use of Smokeless Tobacco and Betel Quid Use: Meta-Analysis.

IF 3.7 3区 医学 Q2 ONCOLOGY
Kriya Shah, Paolo Boffetta, Monireh Sadat Seyyedsalehi
{"title":"Reversal of Head and Neck Cancer Risk after the Cessation of Use of Smokeless Tobacco and Betel Quid Use: Meta-Analysis.","authors":"Kriya Shah, Paolo Boffetta, Monireh Sadat Seyyedsalehi","doi":"10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-24-1502","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The use of smokeless tobacco and betel quid is a significant risk factor for head and neck cancer, posing a major global public health concern. This meta-analysis evaluates the impact of cessation of the use of these products on head and neck cancer risk to guide interventions. Case-control and cohort studies were found through PubMed, Scopus, and Embase databases. Two independent reviewers screened studies and then extracted data. RRs and 95% confidence intervals (CI) for different product cessation were calculated from raw data and meta-analyzed by using random-effects models. A total of 13 studies met the inclusion criteria. Findings were predominantly derived from Asian (n = 9) studies in which betel quid use is widespread. Results showed reduced head and neck cancer risk following cessation of betel quid use with (RR = 0.66; 95% CI, 0.54-0.81) or without tobacco (RR = 0.73; 95% CI, 0.56-0.95). However, other tobacco chewing products showed an RR of 1.07 (95% CI, 0.75-1.53). Long-term cessation (≥20 years) conferred substantial benefits (RR = 0.37; 95% CI, 0.22-0.61; risk estimates = 4). The study highlights the importance of cessation programs and targeted interventions to encourage smokeless tobacco quitting. Future research includes conducting detailed subgroup analyses based on cancer subsites and smokeless tobacco product types.</p>","PeriodicalId":9458,"journal":{"name":"Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention","volume":" ","pages":"619-626"},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-24-1502","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The use of smokeless tobacco and betel quid is a significant risk factor for head and neck cancer, posing a major global public health concern. This meta-analysis evaluates the impact of cessation of the use of these products on head and neck cancer risk to guide interventions. Case-control and cohort studies were found through PubMed, Scopus, and Embase databases. Two independent reviewers screened studies and then extracted data. RRs and 95% confidence intervals (CI) for different product cessation were calculated from raw data and meta-analyzed by using random-effects models. A total of 13 studies met the inclusion criteria. Findings were predominantly derived from Asian (n = 9) studies in which betel quid use is widespread. Results showed reduced head and neck cancer risk following cessation of betel quid use with (RR = 0.66; 95% CI, 0.54-0.81) or without tobacco (RR = 0.73; 95% CI, 0.56-0.95). However, other tobacco chewing products showed an RR of 1.07 (95% CI, 0.75-1.53). Long-term cessation (≥20 years) conferred substantial benefits (RR = 0.37; 95% CI, 0.22-0.61; risk estimates = 4). The study highlights the importance of cessation programs and targeted interventions to encourage smokeless tobacco quitting. Future research includes conducting detailed subgroup analyses based on cancer subsites and smokeless tobacco product types.

停止使用无烟烟草和槟榔后头颈部癌症风险的逆转:荟萃分析。
使用无烟烟草和槟榔液是头颈癌(HNC)的一个重要风险因素,构成了一个重大的全球公共卫生问题。本荟萃分析评估停止使用这些产品对高危人群风险的影响,以指导干预措施。病例对照和队列研究通过PubMed、Scopus和Embase数据库找到。两名独立审稿人筛选研究,然后提取数据。根据原始数据计算不同产品戒烟的相对风险(RRs)和95%置信区间(CI),并使用随机效应模型进行meta分析。共有13项研究符合纳入标准。研究结果主要来自亚洲(n=9)的研究,其中槟榔液的使用很普遍。结果显示,停止使用槟榔液后HNC风险降低,RR=0.66 (95% CI: 0.54 - 0.81)或不吸烟RR=0.73 (95% CI: 0.56-0.95)。然而,其他咀嚼烟草产品的相对危险度为1.07 (95% CI: 0.75-1.53)。长期戒烟(≥20年)带来了实质性的益处,RR为0.37,(95% CI: 0.22-0.61,风险估计=4)。该研究强调了戒烟计划和有针对性的干预措施的重要性,以鼓励无烟烟草戒烟。未来的研究包括根据癌症亚位点和无烟烟草产品类型进行详细的亚组分析。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention
Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
6.50
自引率
2.60%
发文量
538
审稿时长
1.6 months
期刊介绍: Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention publishes original peer-reviewed, population-based research on cancer etiology, prevention, surveillance, and survivorship. The following topics are of special interest: descriptive, analytical, and molecular epidemiology; biomarkers including assay development, validation, and application; chemoprevention and other types of prevention research in the context of descriptive and observational studies; the role of behavioral factors in cancer etiology and prevention; survivorship studies; risk factors; implementation science and cancer care delivery; and the science of cancer health disparities. Besides welcoming manuscripts that address individual subjects in any of the relevant disciplines, CEBP editors encourage the submission of manuscripts with a transdisciplinary approach.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信