Eduardo J Santiago-Rodriguez, Salma Shariff-Marco, Zinzi D Bailey, Justin S White, Isabel E Allen, Robert A Hiatt
{"title":"Residential Segregation and Colorectal Cancer Screening in the United States, 2010 to 2018.","authors":"Eduardo J Santiago-Rodriguez, Salma Shariff-Marco, Zinzi D Bailey, Justin S White, Isabel E Allen, Robert A Hiatt","doi":"10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-24-1424","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Residential segregation limits the access to resources, primarily because of disinvestment. This study evaluated the association between residential segregation and colorectal cancer screening in the United States and whether findings differed by race and ethnicity.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Restricted National Health Interview Survey data (2010-2018) were used to ascertain colorectal cancer screening adherence per US Preventive Services Task Force recommendations. Residential segregation was operationalized using the Index of Concentration at the Extremes (ICE), based on income, race, and ethnicity information obtained from the 2014 to 2018 American Community Survey estimates for counties. Multivariable logistic regression models with robust variance estimators accounting for within-county correlation were used. Analyses were stratified by race and ethnicity and weighted to represent the US population.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In this cross-sectional study (n = 44,690), participants residing in less advantaged counties had lower colorectal cancer screening adherence than those residing in the most advantaged counties [Q1 vs. Q5, OR (95% confidence interval): ICE income, 0.77 (0.70-0.86); ICE race, 0.86 (0.77-0.96); ICE race + income, 0.75 (0.67-0.84)]. In analyses stratified by race and ethnicity, we observed that overall findings were mostly driven by White people and estimates were less precise with no clear gradients among racial and ethnic minoritized groups. Among Black participants, colorectal cancer screening did not vary across quintiles of economic segregation.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Residential segregation was associated with colorectal cancer screening.</p><p><strong>Impact: </strong>Interventions aimed at improving colorectal cancer screening uptake in the United States should address structural barriers present in areas with higher concentrations of low-income minoritized racial and ethnic groups and how features of residential segregation might differentially affect racial and ethnic groups.</p>","PeriodicalId":9458,"journal":{"name":"Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention","volume":" ","pages":"705-713"},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12048236/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-24-1424","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Residential segregation limits the access to resources, primarily because of disinvestment. This study evaluated the association between residential segregation and colorectal cancer screening in the United States and whether findings differed by race and ethnicity.
Methods: Restricted National Health Interview Survey data (2010-2018) were used to ascertain colorectal cancer screening adherence per US Preventive Services Task Force recommendations. Residential segregation was operationalized using the Index of Concentration at the Extremes (ICE), based on income, race, and ethnicity information obtained from the 2014 to 2018 American Community Survey estimates for counties. Multivariable logistic regression models with robust variance estimators accounting for within-county correlation were used. Analyses were stratified by race and ethnicity and weighted to represent the US population.
Results: In this cross-sectional study (n = 44,690), participants residing in less advantaged counties had lower colorectal cancer screening adherence than those residing in the most advantaged counties [Q1 vs. Q5, OR (95% confidence interval): ICE income, 0.77 (0.70-0.86); ICE race, 0.86 (0.77-0.96); ICE race + income, 0.75 (0.67-0.84)]. In analyses stratified by race and ethnicity, we observed that overall findings were mostly driven by White people and estimates were less precise with no clear gradients among racial and ethnic minoritized groups. Among Black participants, colorectal cancer screening did not vary across quintiles of economic segregation.
Conclusions: Residential segregation was associated with colorectal cancer screening.
Impact: Interventions aimed at improving colorectal cancer screening uptake in the United States should address structural barriers present in areas with higher concentrations of low-income minoritized racial and ethnic groups and how features of residential segregation might differentially affect racial and ethnic groups.
背景:居住隔离限制了获得资源的机会,主要是由于撤资。本研究评估了居住隔离与美国结直肠癌(CRC)筛查之间的关系,以及结果是否因种族和民族而异。方法:使用受限的国家健康访谈调查数据(2010-2018)来确定根据USPSTF建议的CRC筛查依从性。根据2014-2018年美国社区调查估算的各县收入、种族和族裔信息,使用极端集中指数(ICE)来实施居住隔离。采用多变量logistic回归模型,采用稳健方差估计,考虑县内相关性。分析按种族和民族分层,并加权以代表美国人口。结果:在这项横断面研究中(n=44,690),生活在条件较差县的参与者比生活在条件较好的县的参与者有更低的CRC筛查依从性(Q1 vs Q5, OR [95% CI]: ICE收入,0.77 [0.70-0.86];ICE种族,0.86 [0.77-0.96];ICE种族+收入,0.75[0.67-0.84]。在种族和民族分层分析中,我们观察到总体结果主要由白人驱动,估计不太精确,在种族和少数民族群体中没有明显的梯度。在黑人参与者中,CRC筛查在经济隔离的五分位数中没有变化。结论:居住隔离与结直肠癌筛查相关。影响:旨在提高美国结直肠癌筛查率的干预措施应解决低收入少数种族和族裔群体集中度较高地区存在的结构性障碍,以及居住隔离的特征如何对种族和族裔群体产生不同影响。
期刊介绍:
Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention publishes original peer-reviewed, population-based research on cancer etiology, prevention, surveillance, and survivorship. The following topics are of special interest: descriptive, analytical, and molecular epidemiology; biomarkers including assay development, validation, and application; chemoprevention and other types of prevention research in the context of descriptive and observational studies; the role of behavioral factors in cancer etiology and prevention; survivorship studies; risk factors; implementation science and cancer care delivery; and the science of cancer health disparities. Besides welcoming manuscripts that address individual subjects in any of the relevant disciplines, CEBP editors encourage the submission of manuscripts with a transdisciplinary approach.