The analysis of factors influencing patient choice of healthcare providers between tertiary hospitals and community clinics.

IF 3 3区 医学 Q2 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Frontiers in Public Health Pub Date : 2025-02-04 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.3389/fpubh.2025.1510311
Silin Wu, Zhaoxia Lei, Tinglian Liu, Lan Chen, Yang Qin
{"title":"The analysis of factors influencing patient choice of healthcare providers between tertiary hospitals and community clinics.","authors":"Silin Wu, Zhaoxia Lei, Tinglian Liu, Lan Chen, Yang Qin","doi":"10.3389/fpubh.2025.1510311","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The uneven distribution of medical resources in China has led to persistently low utilization rates of primary healthcare institutions. The tiered healthcare delivery system aims to optimize resource allocation and strengthen primary care, yet patient preferences for tertiary hospitals hinder its effective implementation. Understanding the factors influencing healthcare-seeking behaviors is crucial for improving policies and promoting system efficiency.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To analyse the factors influencing patient choices between a tertiary hospital and a community health service center in Chengdu and provide recommendations for advancing the tiered healthcare system.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A random sampling method was used in August 2023 to survey patients at a tertiary hospital (Group A) and a community health service center (Group B). The survey assessed demographics, health status, factors influencing provider choice, and awareness of the family doctor system. Chi-square, t-tests, or Wilcoxon rank-sum tests were used for group comparisons, while logistic regression identified factors associated with primary care visits.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 865 valid responses (Group A: 420; Group B: 445; 92.02% response rate), Group A had significantly higher education levels and household incomes (<i>p</i> < 0.001), while Group B had higher chronic disease prevalence and family doctor contract rates (71.5% vs. 59.3, 44.5% vs. 25.5%; both <i>p</i> < 0.01). Positive factors for choosing community healthcare included better equipment and medication availability (46.9%), lower costs with higher reimbursement (45.0%), and convenient transport (41.2%). Negative factors included distrust in community care quality (39.1%) and limited familiarity with family doctors (32.8%). Logistic regression indicated that being over 60 years old (OR: 1.94, CI: 1.02-3.69) and awareness of the tiered healthcare system (OR: 2.48, CI: 1.56-3.96) were significant factors for seeking primary care.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Patients with higher education and income prefer tertiary hospitals, while chronic disease patients are more likely to utilize community care. Low family doctor contract rates and trust in community healthcare quality remain barriers. Strengthening community resources and promoting the tiered healthcare system could improve patient participation and alleviate pressure on tertiary hospitals.</p>","PeriodicalId":12548,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Public Health","volume":"13 ","pages":"1510311"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11832581/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Public Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2025.1510311","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The uneven distribution of medical resources in China has led to persistently low utilization rates of primary healthcare institutions. The tiered healthcare delivery system aims to optimize resource allocation and strengthen primary care, yet patient preferences for tertiary hospitals hinder its effective implementation. Understanding the factors influencing healthcare-seeking behaviors is crucial for improving policies and promoting system efficiency.

Objective: To analyse the factors influencing patient choices between a tertiary hospital and a community health service center in Chengdu and provide recommendations for advancing the tiered healthcare system.

Methods: A random sampling method was used in August 2023 to survey patients at a tertiary hospital (Group A) and a community health service center (Group B). The survey assessed demographics, health status, factors influencing provider choice, and awareness of the family doctor system. Chi-square, t-tests, or Wilcoxon rank-sum tests were used for group comparisons, while logistic regression identified factors associated with primary care visits.

Results: Among 865 valid responses (Group A: 420; Group B: 445; 92.02% response rate), Group A had significantly higher education levels and household incomes (p < 0.001), while Group B had higher chronic disease prevalence and family doctor contract rates (71.5% vs. 59.3, 44.5% vs. 25.5%; both p < 0.01). Positive factors for choosing community healthcare included better equipment and medication availability (46.9%), lower costs with higher reimbursement (45.0%), and convenient transport (41.2%). Negative factors included distrust in community care quality (39.1%) and limited familiarity with family doctors (32.8%). Logistic regression indicated that being over 60 years old (OR: 1.94, CI: 1.02-3.69) and awareness of the tiered healthcare system (OR: 2.48, CI: 1.56-3.96) were significant factors for seeking primary care.

Conclusion: Patients with higher education and income prefer tertiary hospitals, while chronic disease patients are more likely to utilize community care. Low family doctor contract rates and trust in community healthcare quality remain barriers. Strengthening community resources and promoting the tiered healthcare system could improve patient participation and alleviate pressure on tertiary hospitals.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Frontiers in Public Health
Frontiers in Public Health Medicine-Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
7.70%
发文量
4469
审稿时长
14 weeks
期刊介绍: Frontiers in Public Health is a multidisciplinary open-access journal which publishes rigorously peer-reviewed research and is at the forefront of disseminating and communicating scientific knowledge and impactful discoveries to researchers, academics, clinicians, policy makers and the public worldwide. The journal aims at overcoming current fragmentation in research and publication, promoting consistency in pursuing relevant scientific themes, and supporting finding dissemination and translation into practice. Frontiers in Public Health is organized into Specialty Sections that cover different areas of research in the field. Please refer to the author guidelines for details on article types and the submission process.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信