Vacuum sealing drainage combined with continuous irrigation for the treatment of oral and maxillofacial abscesses-a retrospective study.

IF 2.6 2区 医学 Q1 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE
Sunqiang Hu, Jin Xiao, Xin Nie, Chi Wang
{"title":"Vacuum sealing drainage combined with continuous irrigation for the treatment of oral and maxillofacial abscesses-a retrospective study.","authors":"Sunqiang Hu, Jin Xiao, Xin Nie, Chi Wang","doi":"10.1186/s12903-025-05634-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The conventional treatment for oral and maxillofacial abscesses involves incision and drainage. However, postoperative dressing changes often cause pain and other discomfort to patients. Therefore, we explored the use of vacuum sealing drainage (VSD) technology for treating oral and maxillofacial abscesses. In this retrospective study, we evaluated the efficacy and value of VSD combined with continuous irrigation using physiological saline to treat oral and maxillofacial abscesses.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Data from 115 patients with oral and maxillofacial abscesses were collected. Patients were divided into two groups based on the treatment strategy: 68 received traditional treatment (Group 1) and 47 were treated with the VSD device (Group 2). The treatment period, incision length and numerical rating scale (NRS) score were compared between the two groups. Postoperative complications were also recorded.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>All patients were successfully treated and discharged. Group 2 had a longer treatment duration (10.00 ± 5.87 days) than Group 1 (8.07 ± 3.47 days; p < 0.05) but demonstrated shorter incision lengths (3.04 ± 0.31 cm vs. 3.57 ± 0.44 cm; p < 0.01) and lower NRS scores on postoperative day 1 (1.83 ± 0.70 vs. 2.96 ± 0.83; p < 0.01). Complications included two allergic reactions to adhesive material in Group 2 and higher reoperation rates (Group 2: 4 cases; Group 1: 1 case).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>VSD treatment for localized oral and maxillofacial abscesses is comfortable for patients and can reduce the length of surgical incisions. However, the therapeutic effect for maxillofacial multispace infection is still controversial.</p>","PeriodicalId":9072,"journal":{"name":"BMC Oral Health","volume":"25 1","pages":"257"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Oral Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12903-025-05634-x","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: The conventional treatment for oral and maxillofacial abscesses involves incision and drainage. However, postoperative dressing changes often cause pain and other discomfort to patients. Therefore, we explored the use of vacuum sealing drainage (VSD) technology for treating oral and maxillofacial abscesses. In this retrospective study, we evaluated the efficacy and value of VSD combined with continuous irrigation using physiological saline to treat oral and maxillofacial abscesses.

Materials and methods: Data from 115 patients with oral and maxillofacial abscesses were collected. Patients were divided into two groups based on the treatment strategy: 68 received traditional treatment (Group 1) and 47 were treated with the VSD device (Group 2). The treatment period, incision length and numerical rating scale (NRS) score were compared between the two groups. Postoperative complications were also recorded.

Results: All patients were successfully treated and discharged. Group 2 had a longer treatment duration (10.00 ± 5.87 days) than Group 1 (8.07 ± 3.47 days; p < 0.05) but demonstrated shorter incision lengths (3.04 ± 0.31 cm vs. 3.57 ± 0.44 cm; p < 0.01) and lower NRS scores on postoperative day 1 (1.83 ± 0.70 vs. 2.96 ± 0.83; p < 0.01). Complications included two allergic reactions to adhesive material in Group 2 and higher reoperation rates (Group 2: 4 cases; Group 1: 1 case).

Conclusion: VSD treatment for localized oral and maxillofacial abscesses is comfortable for patients and can reduce the length of surgical incisions. However, the therapeutic effect for maxillofacial multispace infection is still controversial.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BMC Oral Health
BMC Oral Health DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE-
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
6.90%
发文量
481
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Oral Health is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on all aspects of the prevention, diagnosis and management of disorders of the mouth, teeth and gums, as well as related molecular genetics, pathophysiology, and epidemiology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信