Real-world Outcomes Following Biologic Initiation in US Patients with Chronic Rhinosinusitis with Nasal Polyps.

IF 3.4 3区医学 Q2 MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL

Advances in Therapy Pub Date : 2025-02-19 DOI:10.1007/s12325-025-03120-y

Anju Peters, Xiaohui Zhao, Aimee M Near, Joseph Han, Joseph D Spahn, Sze-Jung S Wu, Andrew W Lindsley, Tham T Le, Elizabeth J Wang, Rifat Tuly, Inyoung Lee, Christopher S Ambrose

{"title":"Real-world Outcomes Following Biologic Initiation in US Patients with Chronic Rhinosinusitis with Nasal Polyps.","authors":"Anju Peters, Xiaohui Zhao, Aimee M Near, Joseph Han, Joseph D Spahn, Sze-Jung S Wu, Andrew W Lindsley, Tham T Le, Elizabeth J Wang, Rifat Tuly, Inyoung Lee, Christopher S Ambrose","doi":"10.1007/s12325-025-03120-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: Chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyposis (CRSwNP) is often associated with persistent symptoms and impaired quality of life despite treatment with intranasal corticosteroids. Biologics (dupilumab, mepolizumab, omalizumab) have been recently approved for CRSwNP. This study aims to characterize biologic use and real-world outcomes, including medication use and nasal polyps (NP) surgeries, following biologic treatment in US patients with CRSwNP.Methods: This retrospective cohort study analyzed linked data from IQVIA longitudinal prescription and medical claims databases (July 2018-June 2023). Patients evaluated included those with ≥ 2 diagnoses of CRSwNP and ≥ 12 months of baseline data (overall cohort, index = first observed CRSwNP diagnosis) as well as patients with CRSwNP who received ≥ 2 consecutive biologic doses and had ≥ 24 months of follow-up data (biologic cohort, index = first biologic).Results: Of 74,480 patients with CRSwNP, 8716 (12.0%) received a biologic and 2208 met all inclusion criteria. Dupilumab was the most frequently received biologic (89.8%; mepolizumab, 5.3%; omalizumab, 4.8%). Relative to the overall cohort, the biologic cohort was younger (mean age: 52.6 vs. 57.6 years), had more women (54.0% vs. 46.1%) and had a higher baseline prevalence of asthma (72.4% vs. 30.9%), allergic rhinitis (70.6% vs. 37.4%), NP surgery (15.8% vs. 5.8%), oral corticosteroid (OCS) use (84.0% vs. 51.8%), and antibiotic use (84.2% vs. 68.7%). During the 24 months after biologic initiation, 65.6% of patients had ≥ 1 OCS use (≥ 2 OCS uses during months 1-12, 27.0%; during months 13-24, 27.0%) and 77.9% had ≥ 1 antibiotic use; and 7.1% of patients without NP surgery before biologic initiation had ≥ 1 NP surgery during follow-up. Almost half of patients (49.3%) discontinued (≥ 90 days without receipt) their initial biologic during follow-up.Conclusion: Biologic use was relatively low among US patients with CRSwNP. OCS and antibiotic usage among patients with CRSwNP remained substantial despite use of currently approved biologics, indicating an unmet need for improved treatment options.","PeriodicalId":7482,"journal":{"name":"Advances in Therapy","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advances in Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12325-025-03120-y","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyposis (CRSwNP) is often associated with persistent symptoms and impaired quality of life despite treatment with intranasal corticosteroids. Biologics (dupilumab, mepolizumab, omalizumab) have been recently approved for CRSwNP. This study aims to characterize biologic use and real-world outcomes, including medication use and nasal polyps (NP) surgeries, following biologic treatment in US patients with CRSwNP.

Methods: This retrospective cohort study analyzed linked data from IQVIA longitudinal prescription and medical claims databases (July 2018-June 2023). Patients evaluated included those with ≥ 2 diagnoses of CRSwNP and ≥ 12 months of baseline data (overall cohort, index = first observed CRSwNP diagnosis) as well as patients with CRSwNP who received ≥ 2 consecutive biologic doses and had ≥ 24 months of follow-up data (biologic cohort, index = first biologic).

Results: Of 74,480 patients with CRSwNP, 8716 (12.0%) received a biologic and 2208 met all inclusion criteria. Dupilumab was the most frequently received biologic (89.8%; mepolizumab, 5.3%; omalizumab, 4.8%). Relative to the overall cohort, the biologic cohort was younger (mean age: 52.6 vs. 57.6 years), had more women (54.0% vs. 46.1%) and had a higher baseline prevalence of asthma (72.4% vs. 30.9%), allergic rhinitis (70.6% vs. 37.4%), NP surgery (15.8% vs. 5.8%), oral corticosteroid (OCS) use (84.0% vs. 51.8%), and antibiotic use (84.2% vs. 68.7%). During the 24 months after biologic initiation, 65.6% of patients had ≥ 1 OCS use (≥ 2 OCS uses during months 1-12, 27.0%; during months 13-24, 27.0%) and 77.9% had ≥ 1 antibiotic use; and 7.1% of patients without NP surgery before biologic initiation had ≥ 1 NP surgery during follow-up. Almost half of patients (49.3%) discontinued (≥ 90 days without receipt) their initial biologic during follow-up.

Conclusion: Biologic use was relatively low among US patients with CRSwNP. OCS and antibiotic usage among patients with CRSwNP remained substantial despite use of currently approved biologics, indicating an unmet need for improved treatment options.

查看原文本刊更多论文

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Advances in Therapy 医学-药学

CiteScore

7.20

自引率

2.60%

发文量

353

审稿时长

6-12 weeks

期刊介绍： Advances in Therapy is an international, peer reviewed, rapid-publication (peer review in 2 weeks, published 3–4 weeks from acceptance) journal dedicated to the publication of high-quality clinical (all phases), observational, real-world, and health outcomes research around the discovery, development, and use of therapeutics and interventions (including devices) across all therapeutic areas. Studies relating to diagnostics and diagnosis, pharmacoeconomics, public health, epidemiology, quality of life, and patient care, management, and education are also encouraged. The journal is of interest to a broad audience of healthcare professionals and publishes original research, reviews, communications and letters. The journal is read by a global audience and receives submissions from all over the world. Advances in Therapy will consider all scientifically sound research be it positive, confirmatory or negative data. Submissions are welcomed whether they relate to an international and/or a country-specific audience, something that is crucially important when researchers are trying to target more specific patient populations. This inclusive approach allows the journal to assist in the dissemination of all scientifically and ethically sound research.