{"title":"The Performance of a Rapid Coronavirus Disease 2019 Antigen Test in Rural Gabon.","authors":"Saskia Dede Davi, Dearie Glory Okwu, Lillian Rene Endamne, Teite Rebecca Hildebrandt, Rella Zoleko-Manego, Ghyslain Mombo-Ngoma, Maradona Daouda Agbanrin, Rafiou Adamou, Ayola Akim Adegnika, Selidji Todagbe Agnandji, Michael Ramharter, Johannes Mischlinger","doi":"10.4269/ajtmh.24-0230","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Access to severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) testing is limited in rural sub-Saharan Africa. We evaluated the performance of the Siemens CLINITEST® rapid coronavirus disease 2019 antigen test under real-life conditions during the pandemic in rural Gabon. From August 2021 to February 2022, 277 participants were tested in Sindara and Lambaréné, Gabon, via outpatient mobile services. Of these participants, 54.6% were female, with a median age of 29 years (interquartile range: 12-55). The test performance was analyzed for the main population and for SARS-CoV-2 infected sub-populations at both study sites (Lambaréné and Sindara). We further evaluated subpopulations with higher viral loads using a cycle threshold (Ct) value restricted to <35, 30, 25, and 20. Overall test sensitivity in the main population was 33.3% (95% CI: 23.6-44.3%), improving to 83.3% (95% CI: 35.9-99.6%) with a Ct value of <20. Specificity across all populations was 100% (190/190; 95% CI: 98.1-100%). The prevalence of polymerase chain reaction-defined SARS-CoV-2 was 31.4%. The positive predictive value was 100% (95% CI: 88.1-100%), and negative predictive value was 76.6% (95% CI: 70.8-81.7%). Sensitivity in Sindara was 71.4% (95% CI: 29-96.3%) and 30% (95% CI: 20.3-41.3%) in Lambaréné. The Siemens CLINITEST® demonstrated high specificity but low sensitivity overall. However, it exceeded the WHO-defined quality criteria of 80% in participants with high viral loads, making it a useful tool in resource-limited settings.</p>","PeriodicalId":7752,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4269/ajtmh.24-0230","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Access to severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) testing is limited in rural sub-Saharan Africa. We evaluated the performance of the Siemens CLINITEST® rapid coronavirus disease 2019 antigen test under real-life conditions during the pandemic in rural Gabon. From August 2021 to February 2022, 277 participants were tested in Sindara and Lambaréné, Gabon, via outpatient mobile services. Of these participants, 54.6% were female, with a median age of 29 years (interquartile range: 12-55). The test performance was analyzed for the main population and for SARS-CoV-2 infected sub-populations at both study sites (Lambaréné and Sindara). We further evaluated subpopulations with higher viral loads using a cycle threshold (Ct) value restricted to <35, 30, 25, and 20. Overall test sensitivity in the main population was 33.3% (95% CI: 23.6-44.3%), improving to 83.3% (95% CI: 35.9-99.6%) with a Ct value of <20. Specificity across all populations was 100% (190/190; 95% CI: 98.1-100%). The prevalence of polymerase chain reaction-defined SARS-CoV-2 was 31.4%. The positive predictive value was 100% (95% CI: 88.1-100%), and negative predictive value was 76.6% (95% CI: 70.8-81.7%). Sensitivity in Sindara was 71.4% (95% CI: 29-96.3%) and 30% (95% CI: 20.3-41.3%) in Lambaréné. The Siemens CLINITEST® demonstrated high specificity but low sensitivity overall. However, it exceeded the WHO-defined quality criteria of 80% in participants with high viral loads, making it a useful tool in resource-limited settings.
期刊介绍:
The American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene, established in 1921, is published monthly by the American Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene. It is among the top-ranked tropical medicine journals in the world publishing original scientific articles and the latest science covering new research with an emphasis on population, clinical and laboratory science and the application of technology in the fields of tropical medicine, parasitology, immunology, infectious diseases, epidemiology, basic and molecular biology, virology and international medicine.
The Journal publishes unsolicited peer-reviewed manuscripts, review articles, short reports, images in Clinical Tropical Medicine, case studies, reports on the efficacy of new drugs and methods of treatment, prevention and control methodologies,new testing methods and equipment, book reports and Letters to the Editor. Topics range from applied epidemiology in such relevant areas as AIDS to the molecular biology of vaccine development.
The Journal is of interest to epidemiologists, parasitologists, virologists, clinicians, entomologists and public health officials who are concerned with health issues of the tropics, developing nations and emerging infectious diseases. Major granting institutions including philanthropic and governmental institutions active in the public health field, and medical and scientific libraries throughout the world purchase the Journal.
Two or more supplements to the Journal on topics of special interest are published annually. These supplements represent comprehensive and multidisciplinary discussions of issues of concern to tropical disease specialists and health issues of developing countries