Goals of care discussions and treatment limitation decisions in European acute geriatric units: a one-day cross-sectional study.

IF 6 2区 医学 Q1 GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY
Ruth Piers, Sophie Pautex, Lourdes Rexach Cano, Jean-Claude Leners, Marc Vali Ahmed, Isabelle De Brauwer, Fatma Ö Kayhan Koçak, Dana Hrnciarikova, Marcin Cwynar, Mariana Alves, Erwin H Pilgram, Rozemarijn L van Bruchem-Visser
{"title":"Goals of care discussions and treatment limitation decisions in European acute geriatric units: a one-day cross-sectional study.","authors":"Ruth Piers, Sophie Pautex, Lourdes Rexach Cano, Jean-Claude Leners, Marc Vali Ahmed, Isabelle De Brauwer, Fatma Ö Kayhan Koçak, Dana Hrnciarikova, Marcin Cwynar, Mariana Alves, Erwin H Pilgram, Rozemarijn L van Bruchem-Visser","doi":"10.1093/ageing/afaf026","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>It is important to pursue goal-concordant care and to prevent non-beneficial interventions in older people.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To describe serious illness communication and decision-making practices in hospitalised older people in Europe.</p><p><strong>Setting/participants: </strong>Data on advance directives, goals of care (GOC) discussions and treatment limitation decisions were collected about patients aged 75-years and older admitted to 23 European acute geriatric units (AGUs).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In this cohort of 590 older persons [59.5% aged 85 and above, 59.3% female, median premorbid Clinical Frailty Score (CFS) 6], a formal advance directive was recorded in 3.3% and a pre-hospital treatment limitation in 14.0% with significant differences between European regions (respectively P < 0.001 and P = 0.018).Most prevalent GOC was preservation of function (46.8%). GOC were discussed with patients in 64.0%, with families in 73.0%, within the interprofessional hospital team in 67.0% and with primary care in 13.4%. The GOC and the extent to which it was discussed differed between European regions (both P < 0.001). The prevalence of treatment limitation decisions was 53.7% with a large difference within and between countries (P < 0.001). The odds of having a treatment limitation decision were higher for patients with pre-hospital treatment limitation decisions (OR 39.1), residing in Western versus Southern Europe (OR 4.8), belonging to an older age category (OR 3.2), living with a higher number of severe comorbidities (OR 2.2) and higher premorbid CFS (OR 1.3).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>There is large variability across European AGUs concerning GOC discussions and treatment limitation decisions. Sharing of information between primary and hospital care about patient preferences is noticeably deficient.</p>","PeriodicalId":7682,"journal":{"name":"Age and ageing","volume":"54 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11836419/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Age and ageing","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/ageing/afaf026","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: It is important to pursue goal-concordant care and to prevent non-beneficial interventions in older people.

Aim: To describe serious illness communication and decision-making practices in hospitalised older people in Europe.

Setting/participants: Data on advance directives, goals of care (GOC) discussions and treatment limitation decisions were collected about patients aged 75-years and older admitted to 23 European acute geriatric units (AGUs).

Results: In this cohort of 590 older persons [59.5% aged 85 and above, 59.3% female, median premorbid Clinical Frailty Score (CFS) 6], a formal advance directive was recorded in 3.3% and a pre-hospital treatment limitation in 14.0% with significant differences between European regions (respectively P < 0.001 and P = 0.018).Most prevalent GOC was preservation of function (46.8%). GOC were discussed with patients in 64.0%, with families in 73.0%, within the interprofessional hospital team in 67.0% and with primary care in 13.4%. The GOC and the extent to which it was discussed differed between European regions (both P < 0.001). The prevalence of treatment limitation decisions was 53.7% with a large difference within and between countries (P < 0.001). The odds of having a treatment limitation decision were higher for patients with pre-hospital treatment limitation decisions (OR 39.1), residing in Western versus Southern Europe (OR 4.8), belonging to an older age category (OR 3.2), living with a higher number of severe comorbidities (OR 2.2) and higher premorbid CFS (OR 1.3).

Conclusions: There is large variability across European AGUs concerning GOC discussions and treatment limitation decisions. Sharing of information between primary and hospital care about patient preferences is noticeably deficient.

欧洲急性老年病房护理讨论和治疗限制决策的目标:一项为期一天的横断面研究。
背景:在老年人中追求目标一致的护理和防止非有益干预是很重要的。目的:描述欧洲住院老年人的严重疾病沟通和决策实践。环境/参与者:收集了23个欧洲急性老年病房(agu)的75岁及以上患者的预先指示、护理目标(GOC)讨论和治疗限制决定的数据。结果:在该队列中,590名老年人[59.5%为85岁及以上,59.3%为女性,中位病前临床虚弱评分(CFS) 6]中,3.3%的人记录了正式的预先指示,14.0%的人记录了院前治疗限制,欧洲地区之间存在显著差异(分别为P)。结论:欧洲agu在GOC讨论和治疗限制决策方面存在很大差异。初级保健和医院保健之间关于患者偏好的信息共享明显不足。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Age and ageing
Age and ageing 医学-老年医学
CiteScore
9.20
自引率
6.00%
发文量
796
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Age and Ageing is an international journal publishing refereed original articles and commissioned reviews on geriatric medicine and gerontology. Its range includes research on ageing and clinical, epidemiological, and psychological aspects of later life.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信