The Impact of Over Three Years Commercial Use of Ex Vivo Normothermic Machine Perfusion for Liver Transplantation in the USA: A UNOS/OPTN Database Analysis.

IF 2.2 3区 医学 Q3 ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL
Takayuki Yamamoto, Naoru Koizumi, James F Markmann
{"title":"The Impact of Over Three Years Commercial Use of Ex Vivo Normothermic Machine Perfusion for Liver Transplantation in the USA: A UNOS/OPTN Database Analysis.","authors":"Takayuki Yamamoto, Naoru Koizumi, James F Markmann","doi":"10.1111/aor.14975","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Data to date using normothermic machine perfusion (NMP) devices to resuscitate and assess marginal livers such as donation after circulatory death (DCD) livers has shown impressive prevention of ischemic reperfusion injury and ischemic cholangiopathy (IC). We examined the impact of these NMP devices over 3 years after their release for commercial use on deceased donor liver transplantation (LT).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a retrospective analysis of UNOS-SRTR data of livers recovered from DCD donors or older (≥ 60 years old) donation after brain death (DBD) donors for LT as well as the outcome of LT from DBD or DCD donors performed from 1/1/2016 to 6/30/2024 to compare differences with ischemic cold storage (ICS) versus NMP.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 10 778 donors of DCD livers, 1987 donors used NMP, and 8791 donors used ICS. In NMP group, the proportion of discarded livers was significantly less (7.25% vs. 30.52%), donors were older, donor BMI higher and more expanded criteria donor than those in ICS group (all, p < 0.001). For older donors, 416 cases used NMP and in 10 708 cases the liver was recovered via ICS. The discard rate of livers in NMP group was significantly less (4.33% vs. 12.18%, p < 0.001) and donors were older and donor BMI higher than that in ICS group. In DCD LT, the incidence of primary nonfunction (PNF), acute rejection within 1 year after LT as well as graft failure due to IC and hepatic artery thrombosis (HAT) in NMP group were significantly less than those in ICS group.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In conclusion, commercial use of NMP has expanded the donor pool by accelerated usage of marginal livers such as DCD and older donors by permitting longer preservation and functional assessment of the liver. In addition, the usage of NMP for DCD LTs was associate with a reduced incidence of rejection, PNF, graft failure due to IC and HAT.</p>","PeriodicalId":8450,"journal":{"name":"Artificial organs","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Artificial organs","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/aor.14975","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Data to date using normothermic machine perfusion (NMP) devices to resuscitate and assess marginal livers such as donation after circulatory death (DCD) livers has shown impressive prevention of ischemic reperfusion injury and ischemic cholangiopathy (IC). We examined the impact of these NMP devices over 3 years after their release for commercial use on deceased donor liver transplantation (LT).

Methods: We conducted a retrospective analysis of UNOS-SRTR data of livers recovered from DCD donors or older (≥ 60 years old) donation after brain death (DBD) donors for LT as well as the outcome of LT from DBD or DCD donors performed from 1/1/2016 to 6/30/2024 to compare differences with ischemic cold storage (ICS) versus NMP.

Results: Among 10 778 donors of DCD livers, 1987 donors used NMP, and 8791 donors used ICS. In NMP group, the proportion of discarded livers was significantly less (7.25% vs. 30.52%), donors were older, donor BMI higher and more expanded criteria donor than those in ICS group (all, p < 0.001). For older donors, 416 cases used NMP and in 10 708 cases the liver was recovered via ICS. The discard rate of livers in NMP group was significantly less (4.33% vs. 12.18%, p < 0.001) and donors were older and donor BMI higher than that in ICS group. In DCD LT, the incidence of primary nonfunction (PNF), acute rejection within 1 year after LT as well as graft failure due to IC and hepatic artery thrombosis (HAT) in NMP group were significantly less than those in ICS group.

Conclusion: In conclusion, commercial use of NMP has expanded the donor pool by accelerated usage of marginal livers such as DCD and older donors by permitting longer preservation and functional assessment of the liver. In addition, the usage of NMP for DCD LTs was associate with a reduced incidence of rejection, PNF, graft failure due to IC and HAT.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Artificial organs
Artificial organs 工程技术-工程:生物医学
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
12.50%
发文量
303
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Artificial Organs is the official peer reviewed journal of The International Federation for Artificial Organs (Members of the Federation are: The American Society for Artificial Internal Organs, The European Society for Artificial Organs, and The Japanese Society for Artificial Organs), The International Faculty for Artificial Organs, the International Society for Rotary Blood Pumps, The International Society for Pediatric Mechanical Cardiopulmonary Support, and the Vienna International Workshop on Functional Electrical Stimulation. Artificial Organs publishes original research articles dealing with developments in artificial organs applications and treatment modalities and their clinical applications worldwide. Membership in the Societies listed above is not a prerequisite for publication. Articles are published without charge to the author except for color figures and excess page charges as noted.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信