Diagnostic Performance of a Computer-aided System for Tuberculosis Screening in Two Philippine Cities.

Q4 Medicine
Acta Medica Philippina Pub Date : 2025-01-31 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.47895/amp.vi0.8950
Gabrielle P Flores, Reiner Lorenzo J Tamayo, Robert Neil F Leong, Christian Sergio M Biglaen, Kathleen Nicole T Uy, Renee Rose O Maglente, Marlex Jorome M Nuguid, Jason V Alacapa
{"title":"Diagnostic Performance of a Computer-aided System for Tuberculosis Screening in Two Philippine Cities.","authors":"Gabrielle P Flores, Reiner Lorenzo J Tamayo, Robert Neil F Leong, Christian Sergio M Biglaen, Kathleen Nicole T Uy, Renee Rose O Maglente, Marlex Jorome M Nuguid, Jason V Alacapa","doi":"10.47895/amp.vi0.8950","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objectives: </strong>The Philippines faces challenges in the screening of tuberculosis (TB), one of them being the shortage in the health workforce who are skilled and allowed to screen TB. Deep learning neural networks (DLNNs) have shown potential in the TB screening process utilizing chest radiographs (CXRs). However, local studies on AI-based TB screening are limited. This study evaluated qXR3.0 technology's diagnostic performance for TB screening in Filipino adults aged 15 and older. Specifically, we evaluated the specificity and sensitivity of qXR3.0 compared to radiologists' impressions and determined whether it meets the World Health Organization (WHO) standards.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A prospective cohort design was used to perform a study on comparing screening and diagnostic accuracies of qXR3.0 and two radiologist gradings in accordance with the Standards for Reporting Diagnostic Accuracy (STARD). Subjects from two clinics in Metro Manila which had qXR 3.0 seeking consultation at the time of study were invited to participate to have CXRs and sputum collected. Radiologists' and qXR3.0 readings and impressions were compared with respect to the reference standard Xpert MTB/RiF assay. Diagnostic accuracy measures were calculated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>With 82 participants, qXR3.0 demonstrated 100% sensitivity and 72.7% specificity with respect to the reference standard. There was a strong agreement between qXR3.0 and radiologists' readings as exhibited by the 0.7895 (between qXR 3.0 and CXRs read by at least one radiologist), 0.9362 (qXR 3.0 and CXRs read by both radiologists), and 0.9403 (qXR 3.0 and CXRs read as not suggestive of TB by at least one radiologist) concordance indices.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>qXR3.0 demonstrated high sensitivity to identify presence of TB among patients, and meets the WHO standard of at least 70% specificity for detecting true TB infection. This shows an immense potential for the tool to supplement the shortage of radiologists for TB screening in the country. Future research directions may consider larger sample sizes to confirm these findings and explore the economic value of mainstream adoption of qXR 3.0 for TB screening.</p>","PeriodicalId":6994,"journal":{"name":"Acta Medica Philippina","volume":"59 2","pages":"33-40"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11831083/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Medica Philippina","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.47895/amp.vi0.8950","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and objectives: The Philippines faces challenges in the screening of tuberculosis (TB), one of them being the shortage in the health workforce who are skilled and allowed to screen TB. Deep learning neural networks (DLNNs) have shown potential in the TB screening process utilizing chest radiographs (CXRs). However, local studies on AI-based TB screening are limited. This study evaluated qXR3.0 technology's diagnostic performance for TB screening in Filipino adults aged 15 and older. Specifically, we evaluated the specificity and sensitivity of qXR3.0 compared to radiologists' impressions and determined whether it meets the World Health Organization (WHO) standards.

Methods: A prospective cohort design was used to perform a study on comparing screening and diagnostic accuracies of qXR3.0 and two radiologist gradings in accordance with the Standards for Reporting Diagnostic Accuracy (STARD). Subjects from two clinics in Metro Manila which had qXR 3.0 seeking consultation at the time of study were invited to participate to have CXRs and sputum collected. Radiologists' and qXR3.0 readings and impressions were compared with respect to the reference standard Xpert MTB/RiF assay. Diagnostic accuracy measures were calculated.

Results: With 82 participants, qXR3.0 demonstrated 100% sensitivity and 72.7% specificity with respect to the reference standard. There was a strong agreement between qXR3.0 and radiologists' readings as exhibited by the 0.7895 (between qXR 3.0 and CXRs read by at least one radiologist), 0.9362 (qXR 3.0 and CXRs read by both radiologists), and 0.9403 (qXR 3.0 and CXRs read as not suggestive of TB by at least one radiologist) concordance indices.

Conclusions: qXR3.0 demonstrated high sensitivity to identify presence of TB among patients, and meets the WHO standard of at least 70% specificity for detecting true TB infection. This shows an immense potential for the tool to supplement the shortage of radiologists for TB screening in the country. Future research directions may consider larger sample sizes to confirm these findings and explore the economic value of mainstream adoption of qXR 3.0 for TB screening.

菲律宾两个城市肺结核筛查计算机辅助系统的诊断性能。
背景和目标:菲律宾在结核病筛查方面面临挑战,其中之一是缺乏熟练并被允许筛查结核病的卫生人力。深度学习神经网络(DLNNs)在利用胸部x线片(cxr)进行结核病筛查过程中显示出潜力。然而,基于人工智能的结核病筛查的本地研究有限。本研究评估了qXR3.0技术在菲律宾15岁及以上成人结核病筛查中的诊断性能。具体而言,我们将qXR3.0的特异性和敏感性与放射科医生的印象进行比较,并确定其是否符合世界卫生组织(WHO)的标准。方法:采用前瞻性队列设计,比较qXR3.0和两种放射科医师按照诊断准确性报告标准(standard for Reporting diagnostic Accuracy, standard)分级的筛查和诊断准确性。来自马尼拉大都会的两家诊所的受试者在研究时进行qXR 3.0的咨询,并被邀请参加研究并收集痰液。将放射科医生和qXR3.0的读数和印象与参考标准Xpert MTB/RiF检测进行比较。计算诊断准确度。结果:在82名受试者中,qXR3.0相对于参比标准的灵敏度为100%,特异性为72.7%。qXR3.0与放射科医生的读数之间存在很强的一致性,其一致性指数为0.7895 (qXR3.0与至少一名放射科医生读取的CXRs之间),0.9362 (qXR3.0与至少一名放射科医生读取的CXRs之间)和0.9403 (qXR3.0与至少一名放射科医生读取的CXRs不提示结核病)。结论:qXR3.0对结核病患者的检测具有较高的敏感性,对结核病真感染的检测特异性达到WHO标准的70%以上。这表明该工具具有巨大的潜力,可以补充该国用于结核病筛查的放射科医生的短缺。未来的研究方向可能会考虑更大的样本量来证实这些发现,并探索qXR 3.0在结核病筛查中的主流采用的经济价值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Acta Medica Philippina
Acta Medica Philippina Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
199
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信