{"title":"Bond strength of a 3-step total-etch bonding system to dentine - An improved approach.","authors":"H Hassan Elnadif, W Palin, M A Hadis, B W Darvell","doi":"10.1016/j.dental.2025.02.007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Generally, the bonding of one material to another is important for function, and especially in so-called 'adhesive dentistry'. However, there are concerns about the clinical relevance and the discriminatory power of currently employed tests of bond strength.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>Develop and validate a test protocol based on 4-point bending that may be used to examine the bonding of various dental materials to a range of substrates. The bonding of a resin-based composite (RBC) to dentine is taken as an example.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Slices of dentine 'coupons' (5.0 × 2.0 × ∼4-6 mm<sup>3</sup>) from extracted molars were prepared using a diamond saw under running water. Pairs of RBC bars (5.0 × 2.0 × ∼24 mm<sup>3</sup>) (Z250) were bonded symmetrically either side of a dentine coupon using all combinations of the following treatments: E: acid-etched (Scotchbond Universal Etchant), P: primer (Adper Scotchbond Multipurpose Adhesive); A: adhesive (Adper Scotchbond Multipurpose Primer) (all 3 M) as well as N: no treatment. Following retrieval from the mould, test pieces were immediately subjected to 4-point bending at 23 °C, cross-head speed 0.5 mm/min, until fracture. Three-way analysis of variance on log(flexural strength): etch × primer × adhesive, was applied. Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) was used to examine fracture surfaces and identify failure origins.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Flexural strengths in MPa: N: 1.38 ± 0.56; P: 9.82 ± 0.89; A: 5.12 ± 0.73; E: 9.39 ± 1.78; E + P: 21.03 ± 2.63; E + A: 12.80 ± 1.53; P + A: 17.16 ± 3.03; E + P + A: 20.84 ± 3.93. The treatment main effects (all, p < 10<sup>-12</sup>) were not additive, there being significant two-way (p < 10<sup>-5</sup>) and three-way (p = 0.037) interactions. There was no significant difference between E + P + A and E + P (p = 0.86).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>With good reproducibility (low scatter), discriminatory power (clear treatment effects), economy with regard to substrates, the method has the potential to be adaptable to many systems.</p>","PeriodicalId":298,"journal":{"name":"Dental Materials","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Dental Materials","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2025.02.007","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Generally, the bonding of one material to another is important for function, and especially in so-called 'adhesive dentistry'. However, there are concerns about the clinical relevance and the discriminatory power of currently employed tests of bond strength.
Objective: Develop and validate a test protocol based on 4-point bending that may be used to examine the bonding of various dental materials to a range of substrates. The bonding of a resin-based composite (RBC) to dentine is taken as an example.
Methods: Slices of dentine 'coupons' (5.0 × 2.0 × ∼4-6 mm3) from extracted molars were prepared using a diamond saw under running water. Pairs of RBC bars (5.0 × 2.0 × ∼24 mm3) (Z250) were bonded symmetrically either side of a dentine coupon using all combinations of the following treatments: E: acid-etched (Scotchbond Universal Etchant), P: primer (Adper Scotchbond Multipurpose Adhesive); A: adhesive (Adper Scotchbond Multipurpose Primer) (all 3 M) as well as N: no treatment. Following retrieval from the mould, test pieces were immediately subjected to 4-point bending at 23 °C, cross-head speed 0.5 mm/min, until fracture. Three-way analysis of variance on log(flexural strength): etch × primer × adhesive, was applied. Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) was used to examine fracture surfaces and identify failure origins.
Results: Flexural strengths in MPa: N: 1.38 ± 0.56; P: 9.82 ± 0.89; A: 5.12 ± 0.73; E: 9.39 ± 1.78; E + P: 21.03 ± 2.63; E + A: 12.80 ± 1.53; P + A: 17.16 ± 3.03; E + P + A: 20.84 ± 3.93. The treatment main effects (all, p < 10-12) were not additive, there being significant two-way (p < 10-5) and three-way (p = 0.037) interactions. There was no significant difference between E + P + A and E + P (p = 0.86).
Conclusion: With good reproducibility (low scatter), discriminatory power (clear treatment effects), economy with regard to substrates, the method has the potential to be adaptable to many systems.
期刊介绍:
Dental Materials publishes original research, review articles, and short communications.
Academy of Dental Materials members click here to register for free access to Dental Materials online.
The principal aim of Dental Materials is to promote rapid communication of scientific information between academia, industry, and the dental practitioner. Original Manuscripts on clinical and laboratory research of basic and applied character which focus on the properties or performance of dental materials or the reaction of host tissues to materials are given priority publication. Other acceptable topics include application technology in clinical dentistry and dental laboratory technology.
Comprehensive reviews and editorial commentaries on pertinent subjects will be considered.