Somin Cha, Byeongyeol Park, Tae-Hyun Kim, Gregory I. Peterson
{"title":"Comparing kinetic methods for ball-mill grinding: Molecular weight versus refractive index-based methods","authors":"Somin Cha, Byeongyeol Park, Tae-Hyun Kim, Gregory I. Peterson","doi":"10.1002/bkcs.12930","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Polymers are commonly subjected to ball-mill grinding (BMG) to induce chain scission. Milling and polymer parameters can influence the kinetics of degradation, and various kinetic methods have been employed to study this process. The most common methods include molecular weight models (fitting the decrease in molecular weight with milling time) and refractive index (RI)-based methods (such as the Florea method, which fits the decrease in RI signal with milling time). In this report, we compare the rate constant trends obtained from three different molecular weight models and the Florea method to provide a deeper understanding of how the kinetic method employed in kinetic studies influences the observed reactivity trends. Specifically, each kinetic method was applied to BMG-induced degradation data from polystyrene (PS) and poly(lactide) (PLA) of varying initial molecular weight. Each kinetic method produced different rate constant trends (e.g., initial molecular weight vs. rate constant), which could also be influenced by changing the milling duration. Molecular weight models or the Florea method were better suited with longer or shorter milling durations, respectively. Furthermore, the rate constant trends for PS and PLA were relatively consistent if compared with the same kinetic method. We expect that this work will help guide future BMG-based degradation kinetics studies.</p>","PeriodicalId":54252,"journal":{"name":"Bulletin of the Korean Chemical Society","volume":"46 2","pages":"96-103"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bulletin of the Korean Chemical Society","FirstCategoryId":"92","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/bkcs.12930","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"化学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Polymers are commonly subjected to ball-mill grinding (BMG) to induce chain scission. Milling and polymer parameters can influence the kinetics of degradation, and various kinetic methods have been employed to study this process. The most common methods include molecular weight models (fitting the decrease in molecular weight with milling time) and refractive index (RI)-based methods (such as the Florea method, which fits the decrease in RI signal with milling time). In this report, we compare the rate constant trends obtained from three different molecular weight models and the Florea method to provide a deeper understanding of how the kinetic method employed in kinetic studies influences the observed reactivity trends. Specifically, each kinetic method was applied to BMG-induced degradation data from polystyrene (PS) and poly(lactide) (PLA) of varying initial molecular weight. Each kinetic method produced different rate constant trends (e.g., initial molecular weight vs. rate constant), which could also be influenced by changing the milling duration. Molecular weight models or the Florea method were better suited with longer or shorter milling durations, respectively. Furthermore, the rate constant trends for PS and PLA were relatively consistent if compared with the same kinetic method. We expect that this work will help guide future BMG-based degradation kinetics studies.
期刊介绍:
The Bulletin of the Korean Chemical Society is an official research journal of the Korean Chemical Society. It was founded in 1980 and reaches out to the chemical community worldwide. It is strictly peer-reviewed and welcomes Accounts, Communications, Articles, and Notes written in English. The scope of the journal covers all major areas of chemistry: analytical chemistry, electrochemistry, industrial chemistry, inorganic chemistry, life-science chemistry, macromolecular chemistry, organic synthesis, non-synthetic organic chemistry, physical chemistry, and materials chemistry.