A Retrospective Cohort Study on Scan Quality of Implant Scanbodies Matched With CAD Libraries

IF 3.7 2区 医学 Q1 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE
Fatmanur Demir Boz, Kıvanç Akça
{"title":"A Retrospective Cohort Study on Scan Quality of Implant Scanbodies Matched With CAD Libraries","authors":"Fatmanur Demir Boz,&nbsp;Kıvanç Akça","doi":"10.1111/cid.70017","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Purpose</h3>\n \n <p>To assess the effect of scanbody (SB)-type, edentulous site, and restoration-type on the scan quality of SBs used in the treatment of short-span edentulism.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Materials and Methods</h3>\n \n <p>The cohort consisted of SBs with different specifications connected to bone-level implants for intraoral digitalization in the fabrication of fixed restorations. SBs matched with library CAD files for digital implant position transfer into dental CAD software were enrolled in the study group. Intraoral implant digital records were categorically evaluated to assess the quality of SB scans. In statistical analyses, the chi-squared test was used to describe the clinical variables, and logistic regression models were constructed to reveal the association between the clinical variables and SB scan quality.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>A total of 243 SBs were eligible for scan quality evaluation. Scan quality did not differ statistically (<i>p</i> &gt; 0.05) in the SB reference area, while texture in the representation of SB was significantly affected (<i>p</i> &lt; 0.05) by the variables SB-type and edentulous-site. Cylindrically designed SBs without specific geometrical features presented remarkably higher risks for reduced scan quality in SB representation.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>SBs successfully aligned with library CAD files based on a software algorithm may not consistently present similar scan quality. Intraoral scanning of a SB is highly vulnerable with regard to scan deterioration in texture and geometry.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":50679,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research","volume":"27 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/cid.70017","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/cid.70017","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose

To assess the effect of scanbody (SB)-type, edentulous site, and restoration-type on the scan quality of SBs used in the treatment of short-span edentulism.

Materials and Methods

The cohort consisted of SBs with different specifications connected to bone-level implants for intraoral digitalization in the fabrication of fixed restorations. SBs matched with library CAD files for digital implant position transfer into dental CAD software were enrolled in the study group. Intraoral implant digital records were categorically evaluated to assess the quality of SB scans. In statistical analyses, the chi-squared test was used to describe the clinical variables, and logistic regression models were constructed to reveal the association between the clinical variables and SB scan quality.

Results

A total of 243 SBs were eligible for scan quality evaluation. Scan quality did not differ statistically (p > 0.05) in the SB reference area, while texture in the representation of SB was significantly affected (p < 0.05) by the variables SB-type and edentulous-site. Cylindrically designed SBs without specific geometrical features presented remarkably higher risks for reduced scan quality in SB representation.

Conclusion

SBs successfully aligned with library CAD files based on a software algorithm may not consistently present similar scan quality. Intraoral scanning of a SB is highly vulnerable with regard to scan deterioration in texture and geometry.

Abstract Image

与CAD库匹配的植入体扫描体扫描质量的回顾性队列研究
目的评价扫描体(SB)类型、无牙位置和修复体类型对SBs治疗短牙槽位的扫描质量的影响。材料和方法该队列包括不同规格的SBs与骨水平种植体连接,用于制造固定修复体的口内数字化。将SBs与图书馆CAD文件相匹配,用于将数字种植体位置转移到牙科CAD软件中。对口腔内种植体数字记录进行分类评估,以评估SB扫描的质量。在统计分析中,采用卡方检验描述临床变量,并建立logistic回归模型揭示临床变量与脑电图扫描质量的相关性。结果243个SBs符合扫描质量评价标准。参考区域的扫描质量无统计学差异(p > 0.05),而SB类型和无牙位置变量对SB表征中的纹理有显著影响(p < 0.05)。没有特定几何特征的圆柱形SBs在SB表示中呈现出明显更高的扫描质量降低风险。结论基于软件算法的SBs与库CAD文件对齐后的扫描质量可能不一致。口腔内扫描的SB是高度脆弱的,考虑到扫描的纹理和几何恶化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.00
自引率
13.90%
发文量
103
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The goal of Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research is to advance the scientific and technical aspects relating to dental implants and related scientific subjects. Dissemination of new and evolving information related to dental implants and the related science is the primary goal of our journal. The range of topics covered by the journals will include but be not limited to: New scientific developments relating to bone Implant surfaces and their relationship to the surrounding tissues Computer aided implant designs Computer aided prosthetic designs Immediate implant loading Immediate implant placement Materials relating to bone induction and conduction New surgical methods relating to implant placement New materials and methods relating to implant restorations Methods for determining implant stability A primary focus of the journal is publication of evidenced based articles evaluating to new dental implants, techniques and multicenter studies evaluating these treatments. In addition basic science research relating to wound healing and osseointegration will be an important focus for the journal.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信