Experimental assessment of two-phase nozzle performance for low-GWP refrigerants

IF 3.5 2区 工程技术 Q1 ENGINEERING, MECHANICAL
Paweł Jakończuk, Kamil Śmierciew, Adam Dudar, Jerzy Gagan, Dariusz Butrymowicz
{"title":"Experimental assessment of two-phase nozzle performance for low-GWP refrigerants","authors":"Paweł Jakończuk,&nbsp;Kamil Śmierciew,&nbsp;Adam Dudar,&nbsp;Jerzy Gagan,&nbsp;Dariusz Butrymowicz","doi":"10.1016/j.ijrefrig.2025.02.008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The performance of two-phase ejectors critically depends on the efficiency of motive nozzles, which govern the critical mass flow rate and overall system operation. However, accurately predicting nozzle performance under two-phase flow conditions remains challenging due to the complex interplay of thermodynamic and flow dynamics. This study addresses this issue by evaluating the performance coefficient of motive nozzles for three refrigerants: CO<sub>2</sub>, R600a, and R1234ze(E). Beyond ejector applications, understanding two-phase flow dynamics is essential for optimizing other key components, such as control valves and safety valves, which operate under similar conditions. Experiments conducted on a versatile test bench revealed significant differences in nozzle performance among the refrigerants. The performance coefficient ranged from 0.85 to 1.35 for CO<sub>2</sub>, 0.90 to 1.15 for R600a, and 0.92 to 1.22 for R1234ze(E). The Henry-Fauske model, used to predict critical mass flow, demonstrated an average deviation of 30 % for CO<sub>2</sub>, while deviations were much lower for R600a (9 %) and R1234ze(E) (4 %). The results highlight the sensitivity of the performance coefficient to the refrigerant thermodynamic properties, with CO<sub>2</sub> exhibiting the most complex flow behavior due to its lower critical temperature and higher compressibility. This study provides quantitative insights into the performance of motive nozzles under two-phase flow and validates the applicability of simplified models for predicting critical flow rates. The findings contribute to optimizing ejector and valve design, emphasizing the need for further validation with additional refrigerants to enhance model universality.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":14274,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Refrigeration-revue Internationale Du Froid","volume":"173 ","pages":"Pages 111-122"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Refrigeration-revue Internationale Du Froid","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0140700725000581","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, MECHANICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The performance of two-phase ejectors critically depends on the efficiency of motive nozzles, which govern the critical mass flow rate and overall system operation. However, accurately predicting nozzle performance under two-phase flow conditions remains challenging due to the complex interplay of thermodynamic and flow dynamics. This study addresses this issue by evaluating the performance coefficient of motive nozzles for three refrigerants: CO2, R600a, and R1234ze(E). Beyond ejector applications, understanding two-phase flow dynamics is essential for optimizing other key components, such as control valves and safety valves, which operate under similar conditions. Experiments conducted on a versatile test bench revealed significant differences in nozzle performance among the refrigerants. The performance coefficient ranged from 0.85 to 1.35 for CO2, 0.90 to 1.15 for R600a, and 0.92 to 1.22 for R1234ze(E). The Henry-Fauske model, used to predict critical mass flow, demonstrated an average deviation of 30 % for CO2, while deviations were much lower for R600a (9 %) and R1234ze(E) (4 %). The results highlight the sensitivity of the performance coefficient to the refrigerant thermodynamic properties, with CO2 exhibiting the most complex flow behavior due to its lower critical temperature and higher compressibility. This study provides quantitative insights into the performance of motive nozzles under two-phase flow and validates the applicability of simplified models for predicting critical flow rates. The findings contribute to optimizing ejector and valve design, emphasizing the need for further validation with additional refrigerants to enhance model universality.
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.30
自引率
12.80%
发文量
363
审稿时长
3.7 months
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Refrigeration is published for the International Institute of Refrigeration (IIR) by Elsevier. It is essential reading for all those wishing to keep abreast of research and industrial news in refrigeration, air conditioning and associated fields. This is particularly important in these times of rapid introduction of alternative refrigerants and the emergence of new technology. The journal has published special issues on alternative refrigerants and novel topics in the field of boiling, condensation, heat pumps, food refrigeration, carbon dioxide, ammonia, hydrocarbons, magnetic refrigeration at room temperature, sorptive cooling, phase change materials and slurries, ejector technology, compressors, and solar cooling. As well as original research papers the International Journal of Refrigeration also includes review articles, papers presented at IIR conferences, short reports and letters describing preliminary results and experimental details, and letters to the Editor on recent areas of discussion and controversy. Other features include forthcoming events, conference reports and book reviews. Papers are published in either English or French with the IIR news section in both languages.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信