Loneliness and cognitive function in older adults living in Latin America: A systematic review

IF 4.7 3区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL
David Camacho , Pamela Tella-Vega , Fernando A. Wagner , Carolina Santamaría-Ulloa , Amanda Lehning , Joseph J. Gallo , Carmen García-Peña
{"title":"Loneliness and cognitive function in older adults living in Latin America: A systematic review","authors":"David Camacho ,&nbsp;Pamela Tella-Vega ,&nbsp;Fernando A. Wagner ,&nbsp;Carolina Santamaría-Ulloa ,&nbsp;Amanda Lehning ,&nbsp;Joseph J. Gallo ,&nbsp;Carmen García-Peña","doi":"10.1016/j.arcmed.2025.103182","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>English language systematic reviews with samples from high-income countries have found an inverse relationship between loneliness and cognitive function. Considering that cultural and contextual resources influence the experience of loneliness and cognitive health, we conducted a systematic review analyzing quantitative studies exploring the relationship between loneliness and cognitive function in older adults in Latin America. Following PRISMA guidelines, we used five databases (PubMed, PsycInfo, Scopus, LILACS, and SciELO). Inclusion criteria were: a) quantitative research examining the relationship between loneliness and cognitive health, b) descriptions of loneliness and measures of cognitive function, c) English or Spanish language peer-reviewed articles, and d) a sample of older adults in Latin America (≥60 years). We assessed bias using the Risk of Bias Instrument for Cross-Sectional Surveys of Attitudes and Practices. Seven of the 1,887 studies (all cross-sectional) met the inclusion criteria, comprising 26,440 participants from Brazil or Mexico. Most, but not all, found a significant inverse association between loneliness and cognitive function after controlling for salient health and psychosocial factors. Measures and conceptualizations of loneliness and cognitive function, as well as theoretical explanations linking these concepts, varied. Two studies had a high risk of bias. Current evidence suggests a possible cross-sectional association between loneliness and cognitive function in older adults in these countries. Further research is needed to examine the possible bidirectional relationship using representative samples and longitudinal designs; test pathways linking dimensions of loneliness (e.g., chronicity) to cognitive function (e.g., Alzheimer's disease continuum), and explore Latin American diversity (e.g., countries, indigenous peoples, sexual minorities).</div></div>","PeriodicalId":8318,"journal":{"name":"Archives of Medical Research","volume":"56 4","pages":"Article 103182"},"PeriodicalIF":4.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archives of Medical Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0188440925000025","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

English language systematic reviews with samples from high-income countries have found an inverse relationship between loneliness and cognitive function. Considering that cultural and contextual resources influence the experience of loneliness and cognitive health, we conducted a systematic review analyzing quantitative studies exploring the relationship between loneliness and cognitive function in older adults in Latin America. Following PRISMA guidelines, we used five databases (PubMed, PsycInfo, Scopus, LILACS, and SciELO). Inclusion criteria were: a) quantitative research examining the relationship between loneliness and cognitive health, b) descriptions of loneliness and measures of cognitive function, c) English or Spanish language peer-reviewed articles, and d) a sample of older adults in Latin America (≥60 years). We assessed bias using the Risk of Bias Instrument for Cross-Sectional Surveys of Attitudes and Practices. Seven of the 1,887 studies (all cross-sectional) met the inclusion criteria, comprising 26,440 participants from Brazil or Mexico. Most, but not all, found a significant inverse association between loneliness and cognitive function after controlling for salient health and psychosocial factors. Measures and conceptualizations of loneliness and cognitive function, as well as theoretical explanations linking these concepts, varied. Two studies had a high risk of bias. Current evidence suggests a possible cross-sectional association between loneliness and cognitive function in older adults in these countries. Further research is needed to examine the possible bidirectional relationship using representative samples and longitudinal designs; test pathways linking dimensions of loneliness (e.g., chronicity) to cognitive function (e.g., Alzheimer's disease continuum), and explore Latin American diversity (e.g., countries, indigenous peoples, sexual minorities).
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Archives of Medical Research
Archives of Medical Research 医学-医学:研究与实验
CiteScore
12.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
84
审稿时长
28 days
期刊介绍: Archives of Medical Research serves as a platform for publishing original peer-reviewed medical research, aiming to bridge gaps created by medical specialization. The journal covers three main categories - biomedical, clinical, and epidemiological contributions, along with review articles and preliminary communications. With an international scope, it presents the study of diseases from diverse perspectives, offering the medical community original investigations ranging from molecular biology to clinical epidemiology in a single publication.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信